Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Paricalcitol Versus Cinacalcet With Low-Dose Vitamin D
IMPACT SHPT
The IMPACT SHPT Study: Study to Evaluate the Improved Management of iPTH With Paricalcitol-centered Therapy vs. Cinacalcet Therapy With Low-dose Vitamin D in Hemodialysis Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
2 other identifiers
interventional
272
12 countries
83
Brief Summary
Evaluates the effectiveness of on-label Paricalcitol versus Cinacalcet with Low-Dose Vitamin D.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Nov 2009
83 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 20, 2012
CompletedJune 20, 2012
May 1, 2012
1.5 years
September 14, 2009
May 18, 2012
May 18, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Number of Participants Who Achieve a Mean Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) Value Between 150 to 300 pg/mL During the Evaluation Period (Weeks 21 to 28).
iPTH values obtained during the evaluation period (Weeks 21 to 28) were averaged for each participant with at least 2 iPTH values. Participants whose average iPTH value was between 150 to 300 pg/mL were counted.
Weeks 21 to 28
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Number of Participants Who Achieve at Least 30% Reduction From Baseline in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) as Assessed by the Mean iPTH Obtained During the Evaluation Period (Weeks 21 to 28).
Weeks 21 to 28
Number of Participants Who Achieve at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in iPTH as Assessed by the Mean iPTH Obtained During the Evaluation Period (Weeks 21 to 28).
Weeks 21 to 28
Analysis of the Number of Participants Who Achieve a Mean iPTH Value Between 150 and 300 pg/mL During the Evaluation Period (Weeks 21 to 28) Using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test Controlling for IV and Oral Site Randomization Strata
Weeks 21 to 28
Number of Participants With Hypocalcemia Defined as < 8.4 mg/dL and Based on the Mean of at Least 2 Values Obtained During the Evaluation Period (Weeks 21 to 28)
Weeks 21 to 28
Number of Participants With Hypercalcemia Defined as Calcium > 10.5 mg/dL and Based on the Mean of at Least 2 Values Obtained During the Evaluation Period (Weeks 21 to 28)
Weeks 21 to 28
Study Arms (4)
IV Paricalcitol
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the IV stratum received intravenous (IV) paricalcitol and, if hypercalcemia (calcium \>= 10.5 mg/dL), received 30 mg of oral cinacalcet. Paricalcitol was dosed at 0.07 mcg/kg with titration every 2 weeks.
Cinacalcet (at sites with IV paricalcitol)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the IV stratum received 30 mg of oral cinacalcet daily with a low-dose vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) (doxercalciferol IV 1 mcg 3 times weekly (TIW) at sites in the US and alfacalcidol capsules 0.25 mcg daily at sites in Russia).
Oral paricalcitol
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the oral stratum received oral paricalcitol and, if hypercalcemia (calcium \>= 10.5 mg/dL), received 30 mg of oral cinacalcet. Paricalcitol was dosed at mcg = IPTH/60 3 times weekly (TIW) with titration every 2 weeks.
Cinacalcet (at sites with oral paricalcitol)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the oral stratum received 30 mg of oral cinacalcet daily with a low-dose vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) (alfacalcidol capsules 0.25 mcg daily).
Interventions
Paricalcitol dosed per label by region (participants were to receive cinacalcet if they developed hypercalcemia)
On-label oral cinacalcet by region with low dose vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) (either doxercalciferol at US sites or alfacalcidol at non-US sites)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patients \>= 18 years old.
- Patient was diagnosed with Stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and had been receiving intravenous (IV) or oral vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs) or cinacalcet during the 8 weeks prior to the screening period or naïve patients who had not received VDRA or cinacalcet within 8 weeks of screening.
- Patient was on maintenance HD (hemodialysis) 3 times weekly (TIW) for at least 3 months prior to screening and was expected to remain on HD for the duration of the study.
- For entry into the Pre-Treatment Washout Period (for patients who were not naïve to VDRAs and cinacalcet), the patient had to have screening laboratory values of:
- iPTH level 130 to 700 pg/mL
- Serum Total Alkaline Phosphatase level \>= 40 U/L
- Calcium level \<= 10.0 mg/dL (2.49 mmol/L)
- Calcium-phosphorus product (CaxP) \<= 75 mg2/dL2 (US) and \<= 70 mg2/dL2 (non-US)
You may not qualify if:
- Patient had a history of parathyroidectomy.
- Patient had a current malignancy (with the exception of basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin), or clinically significant liver disease, in the opinion of the investigator.
- Use of known inhibitors (i.e., ketoconazole) or inducers (i.e., carbamazepine) of cytochrome P450 (including grapefruit and/or grapefruit juice) 3A (CYP3A) or drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) (e.g., flecainide, vinblastine, thioridazine, and most tricyclic antidepressants) within 2 weeks prior to study drug administration. Commonly used beta blockers such as metoprolol and carvedilol are allowed but are metabolized by CYP2D6; thus, an adjustment to a lower dose may have been required.
- Patient was known to be human immunodeficiency (HIV) positive.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Abbottlead
Study Sites (83)
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22781
Tempe, Arizona, 85284, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 24342
Chula Vista, California, 91910, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21142
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22762
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22758
Riverside, California, 92505, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21442
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23688
Arvada, Colorado, 80002, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21370
Coral Springs, Florida, 33071, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 25902
Hudson, Florida, 34667, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21146
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33313, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 26743
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33313, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22788
Miami, Florida, 33173, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22722
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23147
Tampa, Florida, 33614, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22778
Meridian, Idaho, 83642, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21369
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22786
Detroit, Michigan, 48236, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21144
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21443
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21145
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22505
Flushing, New York, 11355, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22759
Toledo, Ohio, 43606, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22796
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22770
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22772
Aiken, South Carolina, 29801, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21147
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29115, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22982
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21143
Houston, Texas, 77099, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22506
San Antonio, Texas, 78215, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22776
Bluefield, West Virginia, 24701, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22311
Brno, 65691, Czechia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22310
Jilemnice, 51415, Czechia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21624
Ústí nad Labem, 40113, Czechia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22363
Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23105
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23909
Fredericia, 7000, Denmark
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22462
Holstebro, 7500, Denmark
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21748
Coburg, 96450, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 33268
Darmstadt, 64295, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 35903
Düsseldorf, 40210, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21742
Frankfurt, 60590, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21744
Heilbronn, 74076, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21368
Lüdenscheid, 58515, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22362
Athens, 11528, Greece
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38970
Thessaloniki, 546 36, Greece
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22322
Thessaloniki, 54636, Greece
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22463
Thessaloniki, 54642, Greece
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22323
Thessaloniki, 56403, Greece
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39262
Thessaloniki, 570 01, Greece
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22312
Bergamo, 24128, Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21746
Genova, 16132, Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39180
Lucca, 55100, Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22314
Milan, 20122, Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21367
Pavia, 27100, Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21745
Pesaro, 61100, Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21842
Alkmaar, 1815 JD, Netherlands
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22309
Delft, 2625 AD, Netherlands
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21843
Dordrecht, 3317 NM, Netherlands
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38903
Beja, 7800-309, Portugal
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38531
Faro, 8005- 546, Portugal
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22464
Lisbon, 1750-130, Portugal
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23910
Vila Franca de Xira, 2600-076, Portugal
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 24643
Moscow, 123182, Russia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 24642
Moscow, 125284, Russia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21361
Barcelona, 08025, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21364
Córdoba, 14004, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22366
L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, 08097, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38343
Madrid, 28040, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21362
Madrid, 28041, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21363
Palma de Mallorca, 07014, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22367
Pamplona, 31008, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38462
Puerto de la Cruz, 38400, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21365
Seville, 41007, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23913
Linköping, 58185, Sweden
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23782
Stockholm, 182 88, Sweden
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22364
Uppsala, 751 85, Sweden
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23912
Birmingham, B18 7QH, United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21747
Coventry, CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23102
London, NW3 2PF, United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23104
London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23103
Manchester, M6 8HD, United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41982
Omagh, Northern Ireland, BT79 0AP, United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40222
Sheffield, S5 7AU, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Cozzolino M, Ketteler M, Martin KJ, Sharma A, Goldsmith D, Khan S. Paricalcitol- or cinacalcet-centred therapy affects markers of bone mineral disease in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT-SHPT study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Apr;29(4):899-905. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu011. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
PMID: 24500308DERIVEDSharma A, Marshall TS, Khan SS, Johns B. Cost effectiveness of paricalcitol versus cinacalcet with low-dose vitamin D for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients in the USA. Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Feb;34(2):107-15. doi: 10.1007/s40261-013-0151-4.
PMID: 24214232DERIVEDKetteler M, Martin KJ, Wolf M, Amdahl M, Cozzolino M, Goldsmith D, Sharma A, Marx S, Khan S. Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT SHPT study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Aug;27(8):3270-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs018. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
PMID: 22387567DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Using a fixed dosing algorithm based on biochemical criteria may affect interpretation of the results. In the future, the risk/benefit profile of these interventions should be assessed by longer-term clinical outcomes.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Global Medical Services
- Organization
- Abbott
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Samina Khan, MD
Abbott
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2009
First Posted
September 15, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
May 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 20, 2012
Results First Posted
June 20, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-05