NCT00975962

Brief Summary

This study is a blinded randomized study. Randomization for treatment/not treatment with remote perconditioning takes place during transportation to the hospital. This is because the investigators' hypothesis states that remote perconditioning is neuro-protective and the effect is proportionally larger with early treatment. As the size of the effect is unknown, the investigators will use multiple magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to determine the size of a potential neuro-protective effect. The aims of this study are:

  1. 1.To describe method of remote perconditioning in clinical practice regarding feasibility. Pros and cons and potential limitations.
  2. 2.To estimate the size of the effect of remote perconditioning in combination with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPa) treatment within four and a half hours of onset of symptoms.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2009

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2009

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 14, 2009

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

June 23, 2011

Status Verified

June 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

September 11, 2009

Last Update Submit

June 22, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

StrokeNeuroprotectionremote preconditioningSalvage index (%): Difference in infarct growth (PWI-DWI)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Salvage index (%): Difference in infarct growth (PWI-DWI) after 24 hours among patients treated with preconditioning and those not treated.

    February 2012

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Final size of the infarct (T2 MRI after 1 month). Final infarct size adjusted after prognostic factors.

    February 2012

Study Arms (2)

Thrombolysis + Remote perconditioning

EXPERIMENTAL

Remote perconditioning (rIPerC) undertaken in ambulance on rute to hospital in case of suspected stroke. The rIPerC consists of 4 cycles of 5 minute total occlusion of blood flow to the non-paretic arm separated by 5 minutes of reperfusion. The occlusion is secured by inflating a standard blood pressure cuff to 25 mmHg above the systolic blood pressure. Written instruction on cuff inflation and paramedic's documentation of their procedure were written in a standard report which was turned over to a study nurse upon arrival to the hospital, and filed. The investigators were hence blinded to the prehospital rIPerC.

Procedure: Thrombolysis + remote perconditioning

Thrombolysis

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Thrombolysis without pretreatment with remote perconditioning

Drug: Actilyse

Interventions

Actilyse according to guidelines without pretreatment with remote persconditioning

Thrombolysis

The rIPerC consists of 4 cycles of 5 minute total occlusion of blood flow to the non-paretic arm separated by 5 minutes of reperfusion. The occlusion is secured by inflating a standard blood pressure cuff to 25 mmHg above the systolic blood pressure. Written instruction on cuff inflation and paramedic's documentation of their procedure were written in a standard report which was turned over to a study nurse upon arrival to the hospital, and filed. The investigators were hence blinded to the prehospital rIPerC.

Thrombolysis + Remote perconditioning

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Significant ischemic stroke suspicion (NIHSS 1-24) and paresis of an extremity.
  • Treatment with rtPa within 4.5 hours from debut of symptoms.
  • Age above 18 (changed from 01.01.2010 to no upper age limit)
  • Independent in daily living before the acute onset of symptoms. (mrs\</=2)
  • MR scan showing DWI lesion, consistent with acute ischemic stroke.

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindications for iv rtPA
  • Onset of symptoms older than 4.5 hours
  • Previous diseases of the brain: Intracranial aneurisms or arteriovenous malformations. Brain surgery or hemorrhagic stroke. Former ischemic stroke within the last 3 months.
  • Heart diseases: Infectious endocarditis or suspicion of septic emboli, pericarditis, ventricular thrombosis, aneurisms of the heart wall or major heart failure.
  • Serious diseases: Cancer, AIDS, dementia, significant abuse, renal failure, liver diseases such as liver failure, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, active hepatitis.
  • Pregnancy
  • Major ischemic stroke where the patient is unconscious.(NIHSS \> 25).
  • Symptoms suspect for migraine, Multiple sclerosis, TIA or another neurological disease than ischemic stroke.
  • MR scan:
  • Contraindications for MRI scans
  • Tumor cerebri, cerebral abscesses
  • Known hypersensitivity to Gadovist or any of its ingredients, acute or chronic severe renal impairment (GFR \< 30 ml/min/1.73m2), acute renal insufficiency of any severity due to the hepato-renal syndrome or in the perioperative liver transplantation period.
  • Caution with using Gadovist to patients with severe cardiovascular disease, and only to be used after a risk-benefit assessment.
  • Caution with using Gadovist in patients with low threshold for seizures.
  • Lab data:
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Hougaard KD, Hjort N, Zeidler D, Sorensen L, Norgaard A, Hansen TM, von Weitzel-Mudersbach P, Simonsen CZ, Damgaard D, Gottrup H, Svendsen K, Rasmussen PV, Ribe LR, Mikkelsen IK, Nagenthiraja K, Cho TH, Redington AN, Botker HE, Ostergaard L, Mouridsen K, Andersen G. Remote ischemic perconditioning as an adjunct therapy to thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a randomized trial. Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):159-67. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001346. Epub 2013 Nov 7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Tissue Plasminogen ActivatorFibrinolytic Agents

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Serine EndopeptidasesEndopeptidasesPeptide HydrolasesHydrolasesEnzymesEnzymes and CoenzymesSerine ProteasesPlasminogen ActivatorsBlood Coagulation FactorsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsBiological FactorsFibrin Modulating AgentsMolecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological ActionPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesCardiovascular AgentsTherapeutic UsesHematologic Agents

Study Officials

  • Grethe Andersen, M.D Doctor

    Department of Neurology Aarhus University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2009

First Posted

September 14, 2009

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion

March 1, 2011

Study Completion

March 1, 2011

Last Updated

June 23, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-06

Locations