CT or MRI in Work up for i.v. Thrombolysis: a Single-centre Study
Computerized Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Work up for i.v. Thrombolysis: a Single-centre Study
1 other identifier
interventional
499
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute stroke occurs in approximately 13.000 persons every year in Denmark, 10 - 15 % now receives intervenous thrombolytic therapy, which remains the most important acute treatment in ischaemic stroke. For more than a decade there has been an ongoing discussion if Computerized Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) were best before thrombolysis: Magnetic Resonance Imaging is superior in visualising ischaemia, but Computerized Tomography is quicker and more easily applicable. In the investigators centre primary imaging in work up of acute stroke during working hours will alternate between Computerized Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging days based on a fixed calendar for a 24 months period as a quality development project. This study is planned to include patients who have acute stroke imagining during this period, a total of 600 patients is expected. The investigators will compare door-to-needle time, patient safety, quality of imaging, patients' experience, physicians' decision certainty, and use of recourses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2016
CompletedMay 24, 2016
May 1, 2016
2.1 years
July 15, 2014
May 23, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Identification of contraindications to administration of intravenous tissue-Plasminogen-Activator to patients with symptoms of acute stroke
Observed frequency of primary Intracranial Hemorrhage and Intracranial tumors on first day of admission in patients with symptoms of acute stroke examined with Computer Tomography versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging
First day of hospitalization
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time from admission to administration of intravenous tissue-Plasminogen-Activator for patients examined with Computer Tomography versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging
First day of hospitalization
Other Outcomes (1)
Stroke Physicians' treatment certainty of prescribing or refraining from intravenous Tissue-Plasminogen-Activator in patients with symptoms of acute stroke
First day of hospitalization
Study Arms (2)
Computerized Tomography
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be examined with Computerized Tomography (CT) at admission
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be examined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at admission
Interventions
Standard Operational Plan at admission: CT and CT-angiography
Standard Operational Plan at admission: Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI), T2-FLAIR, Gradient and arterial Time-of Flight (TOF)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical suspicion of stroke \<4.5 hours
- National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 1
- Admission to Bispebjerg University Hospital (Copenhagen, Denmark) on even days in the daytime
- Informed consent by patient or proxy
You may not qualify if:
- Patients in whom the stroke diagnosis is refuted on arrival
- Patients not providing informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bispebjerg Hospitallead
- TRYG Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Neurology, Bispebjerg University Hospital
Copenhagen, Copenhagen (NV), 2400, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hanne K Christensen, MD PhD DMSci
Department of Neurology, Bispebjerg University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD, DMSci, FESO, Associate Research Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2014
First Posted
May 24, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 24, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share