NCT02780843

Brief Summary

Acute stroke occurs in approximately 13.000 persons every year in Denmark, 10 - 15 % now receives intervenous thrombolytic therapy, which remains the most important acute treatment in ischaemic stroke. For more than a decade there has been an ongoing discussion if Computerized Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) were best before thrombolysis: Magnetic Resonance Imaging is superior in visualising ischaemia, but Computerized Tomography is quicker and more easily applicable. In the investigators centre primary imaging in work up of acute stroke during working hours will alternate between Computerized Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging days based on a fixed calendar for a 24 months period as a quality development project. This study is planned to include patients who have acute stroke imagining during this period, a total of 600 patients is expected. The investigators will compare door-to-needle time, patient safety, quality of imaging, patients' experience, physicians' decision certainty, and use of recourses.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
499

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2013

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 15, 2014

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 24, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 24, 2016

Status Verified

May 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

July 15, 2014

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

StrokeTomography, X-Ray ComputedMagnetic Resonance ImagingThrombolytic Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Identification of contraindications to administration of intravenous tissue-Plasminogen-Activator to patients with symptoms of acute stroke

    Observed frequency of primary Intracranial Hemorrhage and Intracranial tumors on first day of admission in patients with symptoms of acute stroke examined with Computer Tomography versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    First day of hospitalization

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Time from admission to administration of intravenous tissue-Plasminogen-Activator for patients examined with Computer Tomography versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    First day of hospitalization

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Stroke Physicians' treatment certainty of prescribing or refraining from intravenous Tissue-Plasminogen-Activator in patients with symptoms of acute stroke

    First day of hospitalization

Study Arms (2)

Computerized Tomography

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will be examined with Computerized Tomography (CT) at admission

Other: Computerized Tomography

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will be examined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at admission

Other: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Interventions

Standard Operational Plan at admission: CT and CT-angiography

Also known as: CT
Computerized Tomography

Standard Operational Plan at admission: Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI), T2-FLAIR, Gradient and arterial Time-of Flight (TOF)

Also known as: MR
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical suspicion of stroke \<4.5 hours
  • National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 1
  • Admission to Bispebjerg University Hospital (Copenhagen, Denmark) on even days in the daytime
  • Informed consent by patient or proxy

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients in whom the stroke diagnosis is refuted on arrival
  • Patients not providing informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Neurology, Bispebjerg University Hospital

Copenhagen, Copenhagen (NV), 2400, Denmark

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spectrum AnalysisChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Hanne K Christensen, MD PhD DMSci

    Department of Neurology, Bispebjerg University Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD, DMSci, FESO, Associate Research Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2014

First Posted

May 24, 2016

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion

January 1, 2016

Study Completion

January 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 24, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations