Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
3 other identifiers
interventional
59
3 countries
3
Brief Summary
Background of the study: Fecal incontinence is a complex problem. The social consequences of this problem result in a lower quality of life. The exact prevalence of FI is unknown, literature reports vary from 13-19%. There are variable treatment options depending on the patient and the etiology of the FI. Dietary manipulation, pharmacological intervention, pelvic floor physiotherapy, as well as surgical interventions are currently used to treat FI. A promising current treatment is Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS). The nerves in the spine that control bowel function also have branches which go to the ankle. Stimulating these nerves in the ankle has shown to be an effective treatment for FI in the short-term. The treatment has been shown to be safe and well tolerated by subjects with almost no morbidity in prior urology trials. Objective of the study: The objective of this study is to show that the results of PTNS are based on the treatment of electrical stimulation and not on a placebo effect with a sham treatment. Study design: This study is a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Primary study parameters/outcome of the study: The percentage of patients experiencing a ≥ 50% decrease in incontinence episodes from baseline after 9 weeks of treatment. Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study (if applicable): Mean change in the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score (CCF-FI Score) Mean change in Quality of Life scores in validated QoL questionnaires (SF-36, Digestive Health Status Instrument (DHSI), and Fecal Incontinence Quality of life) Subject's and Physician's Global Impression
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Oct 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_3
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 26, 2015
September 1, 2010
2 years
September 8, 2009
August 25, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The percentage of patients experiencing a ≥ 50% decrease in incontinence episodes from baseline after 9 weeks of treatment and at six and twelve months follow-up.
9 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Mean change in the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score (CCF-FI Score) at 6 weeks and 9 weeks of treatment and at six and twelve months follow-up.
one year
Mean change in Quality of Life scores in validated QoL questionnaires (SF-36, Digestive Health Status Instrument (DHSI), and Fecal Incontinence Quality of life) at 6 weeks and 9 weeks of treatment and at six and twelve months follow-up.
one year
Subject's and Physician's Global Impression at 6 weeks and 9 weeks of treatment and at six and twelve months follow-up.
one year
Study Arms (2)
Treatment group
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreatment group
sham group
SHAM COMPARATORSham group
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent
- Must be at least 18 years of age
- Fecal incontinence with solid or liquid stool causing disruption of the subject's lifestyle
- Psychological stability as determined by treating physician
- Willingness to commit to a rigid follow-up schedule and comply with the investigational plan
- Failed conservative therapy (i.e. dietary and behavioural modification, biofeedback techniques and exercises for pelvic floor muscle retraining)
- During treatment the patient exhibits an adequate motor and/or sensory response (flexion of toe and/or twinkling sensation)
- Is able to read and write
You may not qualify if:
- Major internal and/or external sphincter defect (defined as \>33% of the anal circumference)
- Fecal impaction
- Pacemaker, implanted defibrillator
- Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant
- Neurogenic or congenital disorders resulting in FI
- Inability to travel to the clinic twice a week
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
CCDE - IMAD - Hôtel-Dieu
Nantes, F - 44093, France
Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza"
Roma, 00185, Italy
Maastricht university medical center
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
van der Wilt AA, Giuliani G, Kubis C, van Wunnik BPW, Ferreira I, Breukink SO, Lehur PA, La Torre F, Baeten CGMI. Randomized clinical trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham electrical stimulation in patients with faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2017 Aug;104(9):1167-1176. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10590.
PMID: 28703936DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cornelius Baeten, prof phd md
Maastricht University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2009
First Posted
September 11, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 26, 2015
Record last verified: 2010-09