NCT00974909

Brief Summary

Background of the study: Fecal incontinence is a complex problem. The social consequences of this problem result in a lower quality of life. The exact prevalence of FI is unknown, literature reports vary from 13-19%. There are variable treatment options depending on the patient and the etiology of the FI. Dietary manipulation, pharmacological intervention, pelvic floor physiotherapy, as well as surgical interventions are currently used to treat FI. A promising current treatment is Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS). The nerves in the spine that control bowel function also have branches which go to the ankle. Stimulating these nerves in the ankle has shown to be an effective treatment for FI in the short-term. The treatment has been shown to be safe and well tolerated by subjects with almost no morbidity in prior urology trials. Objective of the study: The objective of this study is to show that the results of PTNS are based on the treatment of electrical stimulation and not on a placebo effect with a sham treatment. Study design: This study is a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Primary study parameters/outcome of the study: The percentage of patients experiencing a ≥ 50% decrease in incontinence episodes from baseline after 9 weeks of treatment. Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study (if applicable): Mean change in the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score (CCF-FI Score) Mean change in Quality of Life scores in validated QoL questionnaires (SF-36, Digestive Health Status Instrument (DHSI), and Fecal Incontinence Quality of life) Subject's and Physician's Global Impression

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
59

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2009

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
3 countries

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 8, 2009

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 11, 2009

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2009

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2011

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

August 26, 2015

Status Verified

September 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 8, 2009

Last Update Submit

August 25, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Fecal incontinence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The percentage of patients experiencing a ≥ 50% decrease in incontinence episodes from baseline after 9 weeks of treatment and at six and twelve months follow-up.

    9 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Mean change in the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score (CCF-FI Score) at 6 weeks and 9 weeks of treatment and at six and twelve months follow-up.

    one year

  • Mean change in Quality of Life scores in validated QoL questionnaires (SF-36, Digestive Health Status Instrument (DHSI), and Fecal Incontinence Quality of life) at 6 weeks and 9 weeks of treatment and at six and twelve months follow-up.

    one year

  • Subject's and Physician's Global Impression at 6 weeks and 9 weeks of treatment and at six and twelve months follow-up.

    one year

Study Arms (2)

Treatment group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment group

Device: Urgent PC neuromodulation system

sham group

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham group

Device: Urgent PC neuromodulation system

Interventions

Urgent PC neuromodulation system

Treatment group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Written informed consent
  • Must be at least 18 years of age
  • Fecal incontinence with solid or liquid stool causing disruption of the subject's lifestyle
  • Psychological stability as determined by treating physician
  • Willingness to commit to a rigid follow-up schedule and comply with the investigational plan
  • Failed conservative therapy (i.e. dietary and behavioural modification, biofeedback techniques and exercises for pelvic floor muscle retraining)
  • During treatment the patient exhibits an adequate motor and/or sensory response (flexion of toe and/or twinkling sensation)
  • Is able to read and write

You may not qualify if:

  • Major internal and/or external sphincter defect (defined as \>33% of the anal circumference)
  • Fecal impaction
  • Pacemaker, implanted defibrillator
  • Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant
  • Neurogenic or congenital disorders resulting in FI
  • Inability to travel to the clinic twice a week

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

CCDE - IMAD - Hôtel-Dieu

Nantes, F - 44093, France

Location

Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza"

Roma, 00185, Italy

Location

Maastricht university medical center

Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • van der Wilt AA, Giuliani G, Kubis C, van Wunnik BPW, Ferreira I, Breukink SO, Lehur PA, La Torre F, Baeten CGMI. Randomized clinical trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham electrical stimulation in patients with faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2017 Aug;104(9):1167-1176. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10590.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fecal Incontinence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Rectal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Cornelius Baeten, prof phd md

    Maastricht University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2009

First Posted

September 11, 2009

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion

October 1, 2011

Study Completion

August 1, 2015

Last Updated

August 26, 2015

Record last verified: 2010-09

Locations