NCT00525291

Brief Summary

The efficacy of biofeedback and/or low frequency electrical stimulation for the treatment of anal incontinence has not been proven. First, large well-designed clinical trials are missing. Second, only few patients reach therapeutically relevant intensities with low frequency stimulation. In this study, a novel therapeutic concept, termed triple target treatment (3T) was evaluated. 3T combines stimulation with amplitude modulated middle frequency (AM-MF), electromyography (EMG)-triggered stimulation and EMG-biofeedback. 3T was compared with EMG-biofeedback alone after a nine month treatment period. Methods In this parallel-group randomised multicenter study with blinded observer we enrolled 158 patients with anal incontinence. Primary endpoints were changes from baseline to nine months in the Cleveland Clinic Score (CCS) and the St. Mark's score (Vaizey score).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
158

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2007

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2007

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 4, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 5, 2007

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

February 18, 2009

Status Verified

January 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

September 4, 2007

Last Update Submit

February 17, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

Exercise TherapyBiofeedback (Psychology)AdultFecal Incontinence/*therapyEMG - BiofeedbackEMG - Triggered StimulationAugmented biofeedback

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCS) in its validated German form after nine months, compared to baseline

    9 months after randomization

  • Validated new St. Mark's incontinence score (Vaizey score) in its adapted German form after nine months, compared to baseline.

    9 months after randomization

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • CCS score after six or three months, compared to baseline

    3 months, 6 months after randomization

  • Adapted Vaizey score after six or three months compared to baseline

    3 months, 6 months

  • Quality of life according to the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQoL) in its validated German form after nine months compared to baseline, as well as between the two treatment groups over the course of time as compared to baseline

    9 months after randomization

  • Track record of the treatment: 1. Continent, 2. Grade improvement (grade II or III to grade I), 3. Frequency improvement: (same grade, >= 2 points improvement in CCS), 4. no improvement, or deterioration, 5. early dropouts.

    9 months after randomization

  • Use of stool regulating medication. Specifically, if biofeedback and 3T increase continence, the use of any stool regulating medication (Fleawort seeds, Loperamide, teas, etc.) should decrease in the course of the trial.

    9 months after randomization

Study Arms (2)

EMG-biofeedback plus EMG-triggered AM-MF-stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Combination of EMG-biofeedback plus EMG-triggered AM-MF-stimulation

EMG-biofeedback alone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: EMG-biofeedback alone

Interventions

In the 3T arm, patients were stimulated with a carrier wave of 25 KHz and biphasic modulations of the pulse train of 40 Hz. Anxious patients trained at first only in the biofeedback mode. The stimulation was introduced after four weeks for these patients. Patients were instructed to carry out the training at home, with an alternating combination in the morning and with EMG-triggered stimulation in the evening, each for 20-minute periods. Apart from this, the protocol of the active treatment group was identical to that of the control group.

EMG-biofeedback plus EMG-triggered AM-MF-stimulation

In the biofeedback arm, patients were instructed to carry out EMG-biofeedback training at home, standing, mornings and evenings, for 20-minute periods. The core of the task was to pull the plug-electrode upward inside the anal channel, like a lift, and to hold it there during varying periods of tension. This can only be done successfully if the perineum rises and at the same time the puborectal muscle is activated. Just squeezing the sphincter muscles does not produce this lifting effect.

EMG-biofeedback alone

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All Patients with fecal incontinence I-III.

You may not qualify if:

  • All Patients with CID´s
  • Definite or possible pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Gießen, Dept. of General Surgery

Giessen, Hesse, 35385, Germany

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Schwandner T, Heimerl T, Konig IR, Kierer W, Roblick M, Bouchard R, Unglaube T, Holch P, Kolbert G, Padberg W, Ziegler A. [3T-AI: a new treatment algorithm for anal incontinence with a higher evidence level]. Zentralbl Chir. 2012 Aug;137(4):345-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271468. Epub 2011 Sep 27. German.

  • Schwandner T, Konig IR, Heimerl T, Kierer W, Roblick M, Bouchard R, Unglaube T, Holch P, Ziegler A, Kolbert G. Triple target treatment (3T) is more effective than biofeedback alone for anal incontinence: the 3T-AI study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Jul;53(7):1007-16. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181db7738.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fecal Incontinence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Rectal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Thilo Schwandner, Dr.

    University of Giessen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2007

First Posted

September 5, 2007

Study Start

July 1, 2007

Primary Completion

December 1, 2008

Study Completion

December 1, 2008

Last Updated

February 18, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-01

Locations