NCT00977652

Brief Summary

Fecal incontinence is a major public health issue since 10% of the French population aged 45 has to deal with it. Different treatments exist and have already been evaluated, like the sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) which has proved to be efficient in 75 to 100% of the anal incontinence patients without significant sphincteric lesions or rectal prolapse. However, the treatment is expensive and can have side effects. Moreover, about 20 to 30% of the patients can develop a resistance to the SNS only a few months following the definite implantation. Yet the development of the posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PNTS) offers a new perspective. It consists in stimulating the same metameric area as the sacral nerves. It is regularly used for the treatment of urinary incontinence caused by overactive bladder. It is a non-invasive technique, causing but a few side effects. A preliminary study showed that 7 in 10 incontinent patients saw an improvement when treated with PTNS. Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyse and evaluate the PTNS technique in the short term as a treatment of anal incontinence. It is done through the means of a multi-centric prospective randomized study. Patients: Will be included: all patients followed for anal incontinence (either with liquid or solid stools) having at least one accident a month for 3months, and who are not diagnosed with colorectal lesions and who are without anal or rectal significant anatomic anomalies, without rectal prolapse, and who have failed to respond to medical treatment (such as medicine or perineal reeducation). The main criterium to analyze the efficiency will be the number of fecal incontinence episodes on a bowel diary. The investigators aim to incorporate 144 patients, that is 72 in each group. 12 centers will take part in this study, that will last 2 years and 3 months. They are the centers of: Bordeaux, Clermont-Ferrand, Grenoble, Lyon, Marseille, Nancy, Nantes, Paris, Diaconesses-Croix,Paris Rothschild, Rennes, Rouen, and Toulouse. Method: The PTNS consists in setting two electrodes on the posterial tibial nerve pathway. The electrodes are connected to an external stimulator. After having drawn lots, patients will be treated for 3months either with effective stimulation (frequency: 14hz; impulse duration: 210usec;intensity:sensibility threshold), or with shame stimulation (intensity: 0mAmp). There will be two daily sessions of stimulation (effective, or shame), 20 min each. A pre-treatment assessment will be established, composed of a stool diary, a Cleveland Clinic score, a Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale and an anorectal manomety, that will all be repeated by the end of the treatment. Expected Results: The investigators hope to prove the short term efficacy of the PTNS on anal incontinence patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
144

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2009

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 15, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 16, 2009

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2009

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

August 23, 2011

Status Verified

August 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

September 15, 2009

Last Update Submit

August 22, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

fecal incontinence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • fecal incontinence episode per week

    three months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • cleveland clinic score FIQL score analogic visual scale urinary score and anorectal manometry

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Active stimulation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation

Procedure: active stimulation

sham stimulation

SHAM COMPARATOR

Inefficient percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation

Procedure: sham stimulation

Interventions

percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation with following parameters: frequency: 14hz; impulse duration: 210usec;intensity:sensibility threshold during 3 months

Active stimulation

Same location with the same device than active stimulation but amplitude of stimulation = 0

sham stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • fecal incontinence, refractory to medical treatment,for more than 3 months,with at least one episode of anal incontinence and/or urgency per month
  • patient with no knowledge of cutaneous stimulation
  • patients with NHS

You may not qualify if:

  • older than 18 years old
  • pregnancy
  • implanted stimulator
  • cutaneous lesion
  • cutaneous anesthesia
  • patients without oral contraception
  • Guardianship and curatorship
  • fecal incontinence secondary to anorectal malformation, surgical sequelae, significative sphincteric lesion leading to repair at a first time, rectal prolapse, active neurological disease
  • patient already treated by sacral nerve stimulation or stimulated graciloplasty, artificial bowel sphincter, radiofrequency

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Leroi

Rouen, 76000, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fecal Incontinence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Rectal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of the department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2009

First Posted

September 16, 2009

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion

June 1, 2011

Study Completion

June 1, 2011

Last Updated

August 23, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-08

Locations