Transvaginal Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients With Biliary Colic

NCT00963950 | Completed DMC

• 1 other identifier: 0902004771
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 30
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

A safe and effective transvaginal approach accessing the abdominal cavity through the vagina rather than the abdominal wall is today considered a routine approach for many gynecologic surgeries. First described by Dr. Ott in Germany in 1901, it is used routinely for transvaginal surgery, for example, transvaginal hysterectomies. This transvaginal technique has been shown to compare favorably to a laparoscopic abdominal approach because of less postoperative pain, the total elimination of abdominal wall hernias and wound infections, earlier recovery and better cosmesis. Although routinely used in gynecological surgery, the advantages of the vaginal approach have not been utilized for general surgery applications such as cholecystectomies. Open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy accessing the abdominal cavity through abdominal wall incisions is currently still considered the standard of care in general surgery for patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease. The investigators intend to access the abdominal cavity through the posterior vaginal fornix instead of the transabdominal approach that is now performed routinely. So far, this method of accessing the abdominal cavity through the transvaginal approach for the purpose of performing intraabdominal general surgery. The investigators' transvaginal approach has the strong potential to further decrease invasiveness and take minimally invasive surgery to the next level in order to benefit the patient even more by minimizing postoperative pain, eliminating the risk of abdominal hernias and wound infections, improving cosmetic appearance and enabling the patient to return to routine activity and work earlier. First preliminary studies show these advantages but further research needs to be done to confirm these early positive results.

Conditions

Biliary Colic

Keywords

cholecystectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• feasibility of transvaginal cholecystectomy

  2 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• pain

  2 years

• quality of life

  2 years

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

transvaginal cholecystectomy

Procedure: transvaginal cholecystectomy

laparoscopic cholecystectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4 port)

Procedure: laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Interventions

transvaginal cholecystectomy PROCEDURE

Transvaginal approach to gallbladder removal.

Intervention group

laparoscopic cholecystectomy PROCEDURE

laparoscopic cholecystectomy

laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 65 Years
• Sex: female
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Female.
• Age between 18 and 65 years old.
• Biliary dyskinesia with documented Gallbladder EF \< 30% or diagnosis of biliary colic with documented gallstones or polyps by imaging.
• Body Mass Index (BMI) \< 45 kg/m2.

You may not qualify if:

• Any female patient, who is pregnant, suspected pregnant, or lactating.
• Any patient with acute or acalculous cholecystitis.
• Any patient with an American Society of Anesthesiologists Score \> 3.
• Any patient who is undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis (PD).
• Patients who are taking immunosuppressive medications or are immunocompromised.
• Patients on blood thinners or aspirin or abnormal blood coagulation tests.
• Patients who have a history of prior open abdominal surgery or prior transvaginal surgery.
• Patients with a history of ectopic pregnancy, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) or severe endometriosis.
• Non English speaking patients.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Yale University: lead

Related Publications (1)

• Solomon D, Shariff AH, Silasi DA, Duffy AJ, Bell RL, Roberts KE. Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2823-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2253-0. Epub 2012 May 2.

  PMID: 22549370 DERIVED

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cholecystectomy; Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Laparoscopy; Endoscopy; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Study Officials

• Kurt Roberts, MD

  Yale University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: NON RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 20, 2009
• First Posted: August 24, 2009
• Study Start: August 1, 2009
• Primary Completion: September 1, 2013
• Study Completion: March 1, 2014
• Last Updated: January 17, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01