Study on the Immediate Analgesic Effect of Yanglingquan Acupoint Treatment for Biliary Colic
1 other identifier
interventional
248
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Guided by traditional meridian and acupoint theory, conducting standardized, large-sample, multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the clinical efficacy of pattern differentiation and meridian-based acupoint selection for biliary colic across multiple levels can provide high-quality research evidence for developing evidence-based guidelines or optimal treatment protocols. This holds significant importance for enhancing the clinical efficacy of acupuncture in treating biliary colic and promoting its widespread clinical application. Therefore, this study will conduct a multicenter, large-sample randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical effects of acupuncture at Yanglingquan (GB34) versus drug therapy for acute cholecystitis biliary colic. It aims to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture treatment for acute cholecystitis biliary colic.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2026
September 26, 2025
September 1, 2025
1 year
September 16, 2025
September 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Simplified McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Score:Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
This is a simple, single-dimensional method for measuring pain intensity, which consists of a 10-centimeter horizontal line. The left end is marked with "No pain", and the right end is marked with "most severe pain". The patient marks a point on the line representing the current intensity of their pain.The higher the score, the worse the result.
One week from enrollment to the end of treatment
Simplified McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Score:Pain Index (PRI)
It contains 15 pain description words, which are divided into two categories: sensory items (11 words) : throbbing pain, shooting pain, stabbing pain, sharp pain, spastic pain, biting pain, heat-burning pain, aching pain, heavy pain, touch pain, tearing pain. Emotional items (4 words) : Tiredness - feeling exhausted, nauseating, fear, punishment - feeling tormented. PRI scoring criteria: 0 = None; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= Severe. Calculate the total score. The higher the score, the worse the result.
One week from enrollment to the end of treatment
Simplified McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Score-Current Pain Intensity (PPI)
This is a single overall score for the current intensity of pain. It adopts a 5-point scoring method: 0= painless; 1= Mild pain; 2= uncomfortable pain; 3= Distress pain; 4= Terrifying pain; 5= Extreme pain. The higher the score, the worse the result.
One week from enrollment to the end of treatment
Gallstones Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Scoring
Referring to the relevant content of the "Clinical Guidelines for New Traditional Chinese Medicine Drugs (Trial)" 2002 edition "Gallstones" chapter, a quantitative scoring table for TCM syndromes was formulated. This study scored three symptoms: right upper abdominal pain, tenderness in the gallbladder area, and nausea and vomiting. The main symptoms (pain type) were scored as 0 points, 3 points, 6 points, and 9 points respectively for asymptomatic, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. For secondary symptoms (nausea and vomiting), scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 are given based on the above conditions. The minimum value is 0 points and the maximum value is 12 points.The scoring time is before treatment and 12 hours after treatment.The higher the score, the worse the result.
One week from enrollment to the end of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Biliary tract ultrasound
One week from enrollment to the end of treatment
The levels of plasma C-reactive protein (CRP)
One week from enrollment to the end of treatment
The levels of plasma cholecystokinin (CCK)
One week from enrollment to the end of treatment
The levels of plasma β -endorphin (β-EP)
One week from enrollment to the end of treatment
Study Arms (4)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONDrug therapy only
Acupuncture group A
EXPERIMENTALAcupuncture at the Yanglingquan point
Acupuncture group B
EXPERIMENTALAcupuncture at the Xiabai Point
Acupuncture group C
SHAM COMPARATORAcupuncture at non-meridian points
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Meets diagnostic criteria for cholecystitis according to both Chinese and Western medicine;
- Patients exhibiting clinical manifestations of biliary colic with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score \>4;
- Aged 18 to 65 years;
- Patients provide informed consent and voluntarily participate in this study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients meeting criteria for emergency surgery;
- Patients with psychiatric issues unable to cooperate with treatment;
- Patients with severe complications such as suppurative cholecystitis, suppurative cholangitis, acute pancreatitis, gallbladder perforation, tumors, or severe infections;
- Patients with other serious comorbidities including liver, brain, kidney, or cardiovascular diseases;
- Patients with severe local lesions (e.g., infections, burns, scalds) where acupuncture is contraindicated;
- Pregnant women and lactating women;
- Patients who have already undergone other treatment modalities.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Begona Barroso M, de Jong AP. A new design for large, dilute sample loading in capillary electrophoresis. J Capillary Electrophor. 1998 Jan-Apr;5(1-2):1-7.
PMID: 10327363BACKGROUNDPatel R, Tse JR, Shen L, Bingham DB, Kamaya A. Improving Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis with US: New Paradigms. Radiographics. 2024 Dec;44(12):e240032. doi: 10.1148/rg.240032.
PMID: 39541246BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- physiciancertified doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2025
First Posted
September 26, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share