Optimize RV Follow-up Selective Site Pacing Clinical Trial
ORVFUP
1 other identifier
interventional
67
3 countries
12
Brief Summary
The purpose of the Optimize RV Follow-Up study is to determine the long-term effect of selective site pacing. Selective site pacing refers to which area of the right ventricle the lead is placed. The goal of selective site pacing is to improve how the heart contracts when paced.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2009
Typical duration for not_applicable
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 1, 2013
CompletedFebruary 15, 2018
January 1, 2018
1.6 years
July 28, 2009
March 11, 2013
January 18, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in Mean Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Between RV Pacing Sites at 24 Month
Difference in mean LVEF between pacing sites (RV mid-septal minus RV apex) at 24 months using the 4 chamber view
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Compare the Change in LVEF From the 2 Week Visit (Collected in Prior Study) to the 24 Month Follow-up Visit Between the Optimize RV Mid-Septum Pacing (RVS) Group and RV Apical Pacing (RVA) Group.
24 months
Compare Change in LV End Systolic Volume After 24 Months Follow-up Between the Optimize RVS Group and RVA Group.
24 months
Compare AT/AF Burden From Baseline to 24 Months Follow-up Between the Optimize RV Mid-Septal (RVS) and RV Apex (RVA) Groups.
Whole time from baseline to 24 months averaged by day
Study Arms (2)
RV Mid-Septal Pacing
ACTIVE COMPARATORPacing lead located in the right ventricle at the middle of the muscle separating the right and left sides of the heart
RV Apical Pacing
ACTIVE COMPARATORPacing lead located at the bottom of the right ventricle of the heart, in the right ventricular apex
Interventions
A Medtronic or Vitatron market-approved dual-chamber implantable pulse generator (IPG) with atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation (AT/AF) trending ability
Medtronic market-approved SelectSecure Model 3830 bipolar pacing lead
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects enrolled in the Optimize RV study (version 3, dated 6 March 2007)
- Subjects or legal guardians who are willing and able to sign an Informed Consent (and Authorization to use and Disclose Health Information Form, if applicable)
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who have a device that was programmed outside the Optimize RV programming requirements
- Subjects implanted with and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device
- Subjects who are pregnant or nursing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Unknown Facility
Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Southfield, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Tomball, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Unknown Facility
Ramat Gan, Israel
Unknown Facility
Rovigo, Italy
Limitations and Caveats
Since the enrollment goal of the study (n=160) was not met (it was decided to stop enrollments after 67 due to slow enrollments), the results of the study were not powered and the results for the primary objective are inconclusive at this time.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Rachael Rose
- Organization
- Medtronic CRDM
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Optimize RV Follow-Up Team
Medtronic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2009
First Posted
July 30, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 15, 2018
Results First Posted
October 1, 2013
Record last verified: 2018-01