NCT00949715

Brief Summary

The purpose of the Optimize RV Follow-Up study is to determine the long-term effect of selective site pacing. Selective site pacing refers to which area of the right ventricle the lead is placed. The goal of selective site pacing is to improve how the heart contracts when paced.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
67

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2009

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
3 countries

12 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 28, 2009

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 30, 2009

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2009

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2011

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2011

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

February 15, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

July 28, 2009

Results QC Date

March 11, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 18, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

PacemakerImplantable Pulse Generator (IPG)AV Conduction DisturbanceSelective Site Pacing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in Mean Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Between RV Pacing Sites at 24 Month

    Difference in mean LVEF between pacing sites (RV mid-septal minus RV apex) at 24 months using the 4 chamber view

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Compare the Change in LVEF From the 2 Week Visit (Collected in Prior Study) to the 24 Month Follow-up Visit Between the Optimize RV Mid-Septum Pacing (RVS) Group and RV Apical Pacing (RVA) Group.

    24 months

  • Compare Change in LV End Systolic Volume After 24 Months Follow-up Between the Optimize RVS Group and RVA Group.

    24 months

  • Compare AT/AF Burden From Baseline to 24 Months Follow-up Between the Optimize RV Mid-Septal (RVS) and RV Apex (RVA) Groups.

    Whole time from baseline to 24 months averaged by day

Study Arms (2)

RV Mid-Septal Pacing

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Pacing lead located in the right ventricle at the middle of the muscle separating the right and left sides of the heart

Device: Medtronic or Vitatron Dual-Chamber PacemakerDevice: Medtronic SelectSecure 3830 Lead

RV Apical Pacing

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Pacing lead located at the bottom of the right ventricle of the heart, in the right ventricular apex

Device: Medtronic or Vitatron Dual-Chamber PacemakerDevice: Medtronic SelectSecure 3830 Lead

Interventions

A Medtronic or Vitatron market-approved dual-chamber implantable pulse generator (IPG) with atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation (AT/AF) trending ability

RV Apical PacingRV Mid-Septal Pacing

Medtronic market-approved SelectSecure Model 3830 bipolar pacing lead

RV Apical PacingRV Mid-Septal Pacing

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects enrolled in the Optimize RV study (version 3, dated 6 March 2007)
  • Subjects or legal guardians who are willing and able to sign an Informed Consent (and Authorization to use and Disclose Health Information Form, if applicable)

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects who have a device that was programmed outside the Optimize RV programming requirements
  • Subjects implanted with and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device
  • Subjects who are pregnant or nursing

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (12)

Unknown Facility

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Silver Spring, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New York, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tomball, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Ramat Gan, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Rovigo, Italy

Location

Limitations and Caveats

Since the enrollment goal of the study (n=160) was not met (it was decided to stop enrollments after 67 due to slow enrollments), the results of the study were not powered and the results for the primary objective are inconclusive at this time.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Rachael Rose
Organization
Medtronic CRDM

Study Officials

  • Optimize RV Follow-Up Team

    Medtronic

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2009

First Posted

July 30, 2009

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion

April 1, 2011

Study Completion

December 1, 2011

Last Updated

February 15, 2018

Results First Posted

October 1, 2013

Record last verified: 2018-01

Locations