"Physiological vs Right Ventricular Pacing Outcome Trial Evaluated for bradyCardia Treatment" (PROTECT-HF)
PROTECT-HF
Physiological vs Right Ventricular Pacing Outcome Trial Evaluated for bradyCardia Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
2,600
3 countries
45
Brief Summary
The PROTECT-HF multi-centre randomised controlled trial will compare two different pacing approaches for treating patients with slow heart rates. In it the investigators will compare a long-standing standard approach for pacing; right ventricular pacing, with a new form of pacing, physiological pacing (His and Left bundle area pacing) in 2600 patients. Patients will be allocated at random to receive either right ventricular pacing or physiological pacing. Endpoint measurements will be undertaken at baseline, and at six-monthly intervals post-randomisation. Treatment allocation will be blinded to the endpoint assessor and the patient. Recruitment and pacemaker implantation will be carried out at each participating centre. The primary analysis will be intention to treat. The investigators will also perform an on-treatment analysis. 2048 patients are needed to detect the expected effect size with 85% power. A total of 2600 patients will be recruited to allow for patient drop-out and crossover. 500-patient sub-study will assess within patient, and between groups, echocardiographic changes over a 24-month period to try and improve mechanistic understanding of PICM (Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
45 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 5, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 4, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 4, 2029
November 28, 2025
November 1, 2025
6.5 years
February 13, 2023
November 21, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Mortality
Death, any cause
From date of consent, until date of death from any cause, assessed up until 78 months.
Heart Failure Morbidity
Adjudicated unplanned heart failure acute care (hospital admissions or ambulatory diuretic therapy i.e. diuretic lounge visit).
From date of consent, assessed up until 78 months, or death from any cause, whichever came first.
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Incidence of clinically indicated upgrade to conventional biventricular pacing (CRT device)
From date of randomisation until the date of first documented incident of device upgrade, or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 78 months.
Patient quality of life assessed via questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L) EQ-5D is the name of the instrument and is not an acronym.
From date of consent, assessed up to 78 months or until death of any cause, whichever came first.
Patient symptoms assessed on a scale of 0-100 monthly
From one month after device implant date, assessed up to 78 months or until death of any cause, whichever came first.
Safety endpoints: Device infections (requiring device extraction), pacing thresholds, need for lead revision or reimplantation, generator change, haematoma and pneumothorax
From device implant date, assessed up to 78 months or until death of any cause, whichever came first.
Pacemaker derived endpoints: a) Atrial fibrillation (duration >6minutes) b) Ventricular arrhythmia incidence c) Daily patient activity (hours stratified by device vendor)
From device implant date, assessed up to 78 months or until death of any cause, whichever came first.
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Right ventricular pacing
ACTIVE COMPARATORRight ventricular pacing (apical or septal lead locations as per the implanting physicians' normal practice)
Physiological pacing
EXPERIMENTALThe approach for physiological pacing will be either His bundle pacing or left bundle pacing at the operator's discretion. If both of these are not achieved biventricular pacing will be performed.
Interventions
The approach for physiological pacing will be either His bundle pacing or left bundle pacing at the operator's discretion. If both of these are not achieved biventricular pacing will be performed.
Right ventricular pacing (apical or septal lead locations as per the implanting physicians' normal practice).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Adults aged over 18 with left ventricular ejection fraction \>35% and one or more of the following guideline based ventricular pacing indications:
- Permanent or intermittent 3rd degree AV block
- Permanent or intermittent Mobitz type II AV block
- First Degree AV block with a pacing indication
- Slow chronic Atrial Fibrillation or Proposed AV node ablation
- Bifascicular block with a pacing indication
- Trifascicular block with a pacing indication
- Wenckebach with a pacing indication
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are likely to only need occasional ventricular pacing, i.e. those with isolated sick sinus syndrome.
- Pregnant women.
- Unable to provide informed consent.
- Those with comorbidity leading to a life expectancy \<1year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Imperial College Londonlead
- British Heart Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (45)
Beacon Hospital
Dublin, Ireland
Univerisity Medical Centre Ljubljana
Ljubljana, Slovenia
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Queen's Hospital
Barking, United Kingdom
Good Hope Hospital
Birmingham, United Kingdom
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Birmingham, United Kingdom
University Hospital Dorset
Bournemouth, United Kingdom
Royal SUSSEX County Hospital
Brighton, United Kingdom
Bristol Heart Institute
Bristol, United Kingdom
Royal Papworth Hospital
Cambridge, United Kingdom
St Richard's Hospital
Chichester, United Kingdom
University Hospital Coventry
Coventry, United Kingdom
Croydon
Croydon, United Kingdom
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Victoria Hospital
Fife Keith, United Kingdom
Medway Maritime Hospital
Gillingham, United Kingdom
Wycombe Hospital
High Wycombe, United Kingdom
Forth Valley Royal Hospital
Larbert, United Kingdom
Leeds Teaching Hospital
Leeds, United Kingdom
Glenfield Hospital
Leicester, United Kingdom
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital
Liverpool, United Kingdom
Hammersmith Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Kettering Hospital
London, United Kingdom
King's College Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Royal Free London/ Barnet Hospital
London, United Kingdom
St Bartholomew's Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Watford General Hospital
London, United Kingdom
James Cook Hospital
Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
King's Mill Hospital
Nottingham, United Kingdom
Nottingham City Hospital
Nottingham, United Kingdom
John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford, United Kingdom
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth, United Kingdom
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Portsmouth, United Kingdom
Royal Berkshire
Reading, United Kingdom
East Surrey
Redhill, United Kingdom
Rotherham General Hospital
Rotherham, United Kingdom
Northern General
Sheffield, United Kingdom
Wexham Park Hospital
Slough, United Kingdom
Southampton
Southampton, United Kingdom
Morriston Hospital
Swansea, United Kingdom
Great Western
Swindon, United Kingdom
Musgrove Park Hospital
Taunton, United Kingdom
Torbay Hospital
Torquay, United Kingdom
UHS Worthing
Worthing, United Kingdom
York Hospital
York, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2023
First Posted
April 18, 2023
Study Start
June 5, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 4, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 4, 2029
Last Updated
November 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11