Trial of Linaclotide Administered to Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial of Linaclotide Administered Orally for 12 Weeks Followed by a 4-Week Randomized Withdrawal Period in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation
1 other identifier
interventional
803
2 countries
118
Brief Summary
The objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy and safety of linaclotide administered to patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). The primary efficacy parameter is the percentage of patients in each treatment group that meet the protocol definition for Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jul 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
118 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 30, 2013
CompletedJanuary 30, 2013
December 1, 2012
1 year
July 28, 2009
September 28, 2012
December 19, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks
A patient is considered to be an APC responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had at least 3 CSBMs, experienced an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline, and experienced a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain (AP) score from baseline during a particular week. The AP score assesses the worst of a patient's AP in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no AP and 10 represents very severe AP. A CSBM is defined as a spontaneous bowel movement, associated with a sense of complete evacuation.
Change from Baseline to Week 12
Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks
A patient is considered to be a CSBM 3+1 responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had at least 3 CSBMs and experienced an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline during a particular week. A CSBM was defined as a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) that was associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM was defined as a bowel movement (BM) that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM.
Change from Baseline to Week 12
Abdominal Pain Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks
A patient is considered to be an abdominal pain responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, they experienced a decrease of at least 30 percent in the mean abdominal pain score from baseline during a particular week. The Abdominal Pain score assesses the worst of a patient's abdominal pain in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain.
Change from Baseline to Week 12
Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 6 Out of 12 Weeks.
A patient is considered an APC responder if, for at least 6 of the 12 weeks of the treatment, the patient experienced an increase of at least 1 Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) from baseline and experienced a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain (AP)score during a particular week. The AP score assesses the worst of a patient's AP in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no AP and 10 represents very severe AP. A CSBM was defined as a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) that was associated with a sense of complete evacuation.
Change from Baseline to Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (10)
12-Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Frequency Rate
Change from Baseline to Week 12
12-Week Spontaneous Bowl Movement (SBM) Frequency Rate
Change from Baseline to Week 12
12-Week Stool Consistency
Change from Baseline to Week 12
12-Week Severity of Straining
Change from Baseline to Week 12
12-Week Change in Abdominal Pain Score
Change from Baseline to Week 12
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Linaclotide
EXPERIMENTALLinaclotide 290 micrograms
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORMatching placebo
Interventions
Oral, once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast for the duration of the study
Oral, once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast for the duration of the study
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient meets protocol criteria for IBS: reports abdominal discomfort or pain that has two or more of the following three features:
- Relieved with defecation
- Onset associated with a change in frequency of stool
- Onset associated with a change in form (appearance) of stool
- Patient reports \< 3 bowel movements (BMs) per week (in the absence of any laxative, suppository, or enema use during the preceding 24 hours) and reports straining, lumpy or hard stools, and/or sensation of incomplete evacuation during \> 25% of BMs
- Patient has successfully completed protocol procedures (with no clinically significant findings): physical exam, 12-lead ECG, or clinical laboratory tests (some patients may require a colonoscopy per American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines)
- Patient is compliant with Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) for daily diary reporting of BM habits and IBS symptoms
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has history of loose or watery stools for \>25% of BMs
- Patient has a structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a history of a disease or condition that can affect GI motility
- Patient has any protocol-excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history or concomitant medication use that could confound the study assessments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Forest Laboratorieslead
- Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (118)
Forest Investigative Site 037
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209, United States
Forest Investigative Site 036
Birmingham, Alabama, 35215, United States
Forest Investigative Site 135
Hueytown, Alabama, 35023, United States
Forest Investigative Site 014
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801, United States
Forest Investigative Site 080
Chandler, Arizona, 85225, United States
Forest Investigative Site 053
Mesa, Arizona, 85210, United States
Forest Investigative Site 078
Peoria, Arizona, 85381, United States
Forest Investigative Site 101
Phoenix, Arizona, 85012, United States
Forest Investigative Site 128
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018, United States
Forest Investigative Site 051
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251, United States
Forest Investigative Site 136
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Forest Investigative Site 087
Tucson, Arizona, 85741, United States
Forest Investigative Site 094
Burbank, California, 91505, United States
Forest Investigative Site 026
Encinitas, California, 92024, United States
Forest Investigative Site 096
Foothill Ranch, California, 92610, United States
Forest Investigative Site 057
Los Angeles, California, 90036, United States
Forest Investigative Site 097
Mission Hills, California, 91345, United States
Forest Investigative Site 005
Orange, California, 92869, United States
Forest Investigative Site 024
Westlake Village, California, 91361, United States
Forest Investigative Site 021
Boulder, Colorado, 80304, United States
Forest Investigative Site 019
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907, United States
Forest Investigative Site 034
Denver, Colorado, 80205, United States
Forest Investigative Site 074
Longmont, Colorado, 80501, United States
Forest Investigative Site 010
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033, United States
Forest Investigative Site 058
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708, United States
Forest Investigative Site 042
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486, United States
Forest Investigative Site 003
Bradenton, Florida, 34203, United States
Forest Investigative Site 137
Brandon, Florida, 33511, United States
Forest Investigative Site 070
Brooksville, Florida, 34613, United States
Forest Investigative Site 018
Fort Myers, Florida, 33916, United States
Forest Investigative Site 030
Jupiter, Florida, 33458, United States
Forest Investigative Site 077
Kissimmee, Florida, 34741, United States
Forest Investigative Site 133
Miami, Florida, 33126, United States
Forest Investigative Site 031
Miami, Florida, 33143, United States
Forest Investigative Site 129
New Smyrna Beach, Florida, 32168, United States
Forest Investigative Site 108
Ocala, Florida, 34471, United States
Forest Investigative Site 092
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Forest Investigative Site 038
Panama City, Florida, 32405, United States
Forest Investigative Site 027
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024, United States
Forest Investigative Site 045
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709, United States
Forest Investigative Site 015
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
Forest Investigative Site 104
Trinity, Florida, 34655, United States
Forest Investigative Site 068
Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542, United States
Forest Investigative Site 032
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Forest Investigative Site 103
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Forest Investigative Site 033
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Forest Investigative Site 020
Marietta, Georgia, 30067, United States
Forest Investigative Site 040
Woodstock, Georgia, 30189, United States
Forest Investigative Site 055
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404, United States
Forest Investigative Site 043
Rockford, Illinois, 61107, United States
Forest Investigative Site 047
Evansville, Indiana, 47714, United States
Forest Investigative Site 046
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Forest Investigative Site 029
Arkansas City, Kansas, 67005, United States
Forest Investigative Site 009
Newton, Kansas, 67114, United States
Forest Investigative Site 023
Wichita, Kansas, 67205, United States
Forest Investigative Site 093
Wichita, Kansas, 67207, United States
Forest Investigative Site 067
Lexington, Kentucky, 40509, United States
Forest Investigative Site 114
Madisonville, Kentucky, 42431, United States
Forest Investigative Site 132
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808, United States
Forest Investigative Site 124
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101, United States
Forest Investigative Site 013
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815, United States
Forest Investigative Site 006
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21742, United States
Forest Investigative Site 073
Lutherville, Maryland, 21093, United States
Forest Investigative Site 001
Boston, Massachusetts, 02135, United States
Forest Investigative Site 125
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49048, United States
Forest Investigative Site 064
Chaska, Minnesota, 55318, United States
Forest Investigative Site 004
St Louis, Missouri, 63128, United States
Forest Investigative Site 085
Vineland, New Jersey, 08360, United States
Forest Investigative Site 052
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
Forest Investigative Site 035
Brooklyn, New York, 11214, United States
Forest Investigative Site 017
Great Neck, New York, 11021, United States
Forest Investigative Site 011
Great Neck, New York, 11023, United States
Forest Investigative Site 134
Setauket, New York, 11733, United States
Forest Investigative Site 122
Boone, North Carolina, 28607, United States
Forest Investigative Site 072
Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304, United States
Forest Investigative Site 016
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403, United States
Forest Investigative Site 119
Hickory, North Carolina, 28601, United States
Forest Investigative Site 088
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612, United States
Forest Investigative Site 056
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401, United States
Forest Investigative Site 065
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Forest Investigative Site 028
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
Forest Investigative Site 044
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122, United States
Forest Investigative Site 123
Columbus, Ohio, 43215, United States
Forest Investigative Site 130
Dayton, Ohio, 45432, United States
Forest Investigative Site 082
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Forest Investigative Site 102
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74135, United States
Forest Investigative Site 039
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206, United States
Forest Investigative Site 121
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615, United States
Forest Investigative Site 069
Greer, South Carolina, 29651, United States
Forest Investigative Site 131
Greer, South Carolina, 29651, United States
Forest Investigative Site 025
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205, United States
Forest Investigative Site 099
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Forest Investigative Site 002
Dallas, Texas, 75234, United States
Forest Investigative Site 041
Houston, Texas, 77090, United States
Forest Investigative Site 110
Houston, Texas, 77090, United States
Forest Investigative Site 063
Lake Jackson, Texas, 77566, United States
Forest Investigative Site 095
San Antonio, Texas, 78209, United States
Forest Investigative Site 076
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Forest Investigative Site 089
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102, United States
Forest Investigative Site 091
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
Forest Investigative Site 100
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84148, United States
Forest Investigative Site 054
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22911, United States
Forest Investigative Site 061
Christianburg, Virginia, 24073, United States
Forest Investigative Site 007
Newport News, Virginia, 23606, United States
Forest Investigative Site 060
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States
Forest Investigative Site 075
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
Forest Investigative Site 050
Richmond, Virginia, 23294, United States
Forest Investigative Site 049
Bellevue, Washington, 98402, United States
Forest Investigative Site 098
Lakewood, Washington, 98499, United States
Forest Investigative Site 066
Wenatchee, Washington, 98801, United States
Forest Investigative Site 083
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53209, United States
Forest Investigative Site 113
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 1H5, Canada
Forest Investigative Site 107
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada
Forest Investigative Site 112
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 7V1, Canada
Forest Investigative Site 106
Ottawa, Ontario, K2C 3R2, Canada
Forest Investigative Site 115
Sarnia, Ontario, N7T 4X3, Canada
Forest Investigative Site 008
Toronto, Ontario, M3N 2V7, Canada
Forest Investigative Site 116
Toronto, Ontario, M4S 1Y2, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Rao SS, Quigley EM, Shiff SJ, Lavins BJ, Kurtz CB, MacDougall JE, Currie MG, Johnston JM. Effect of linaclotide on severe abdominal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;12(4):616-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.022. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
PMID: 24075889DERIVEDQuigley EM, Tack J, Chey WD, Rao SS, Fortea J, Falques M, Diaz C, Shiff SJ, Currie MG, Johnston JM. Randomised clinical trials: linaclotide phase 3 studies in IBS-C - a prespecified further analysis based on European Medicines Agency-specified endpoints. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jan;37(1):49-61. doi: 10.1111/apt.12123. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
PMID: 23116208DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Paul F.C. Eng Ph.D Director, Clinical Development
- Organization
- Forest Research Institute
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Paul F.C. Eng, PhD
Forest Research Institute, a subsidiary of Forest Laboratories Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2009
First Posted
July 29, 2009
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion
July 1, 2010
Study Completion
August 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 30, 2013
Results First Posted
January 30, 2013
Record last verified: 2012-12