Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Trial of Linaclotide Administered to Patients With Chronic Constipation
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial of Linaclotide Administered Orally for 12 Weeks in Patients With Chronic Constipation
1 other identifier
interventional
633
2 countries
108
Brief Summary
The objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy and safety of linaclotide administered to patients with chronic constipation (CC). The primary efficacy parameter is the percentage of patients in each treatment group that meet the protocol definition for Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Overall Responder
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Sep 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
108 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 30, 2013
CompletedJanuary 30, 2013
December 1, 2012
10 months
October 1, 2008
September 28, 2012
December 19, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Overall Responder
A 12-week CSBM overall responders was defined as a patient who for at least 9 of the 12 weeks of the treatment period had a CSBM weekly frequency rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline. A CSBM was defined as a spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) that was associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM was defined as a bowel movement (BM) that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM.
Change from Baseline to Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (7)
12-week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Frequency Rate
Change from Baseline to Week 12
12-Week Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) Frequency Rate
Change from Baseline to Week 12
12-Week Stool Consistency
Change from Baseline to Week 12
12-Week Severity of Straining
Change from Baseline to Week 12
12-Week Abdominal Discomfort
Change from Baseline to Week 12
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
1
EXPERIMENTALLinaclotide 290 micrograms
2
EXPERIMENTALLinaclotide 145 micrograms
3
PLACEBO COMPARATORMatching placebo
Interventions
Oral, once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast for the duration of the study
Oral, once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast for the duration of the study
Oral, once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast for the duration of the study
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient has completed a colonoscopy according to the AGA criteria, with no clinically significant findings
- Patient has successfully completed protocol procedures (with no clinically significant findings): physical exam, 12-lead ECG, or clinical laboratory tests
- Patient meets protocol criteria for CC: reports \< 3 bowel movements per week and reports straining, lumpy or hard stools, and/or sensation of incomplete evacuation during \> 25% of BMs
- Patient demonstrates continued chronic constipation through Pretreatment Period
- Patient is compliant with IVRS
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has history of loose or watery stools
- Patient has symptoms of or been diagnosed with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
- Patient has a structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a disease or condition that can affect GI motility
- Patient has any protocol-excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history that could confound the study assessments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Forest Laboratorieslead
- Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (108)
Forest Investigative Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35215, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Chandler, Arizona, 85225, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Mesa, Arizona, 85210, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Peoria, Arizona, 85381, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85012, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85741, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Burbank, California, 91505, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Encinitas, California, 92024, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Foothill Ranch, California, 92610, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Los Angeles, California, 90036, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Orange, California, 92869, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Westlake Village, California, 91361, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Boulder, Colorado, 80304, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909, United States
Forest Investigative Sites
Denver, Colorado, 80205, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Longmont, Colorado, 80501, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Bradenton, Florida, 34203, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Brooksville, Florida, 34601, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Fort Myers, Florida, 33916, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Jupiter, Florida, 33458, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Kissimmee, Florida, 34741, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, 33143, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Ocala, Florida, 34471, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Panama City, Florida, 32405, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024, United States
Forest Investigative Site
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Trinity, Florida, 34655, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30067, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Woodstock, Georgia, 30189, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Rockford, Illinois, 61107, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Elkhart, Indiana, 46514, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Evansville, Indiana, 47714, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46254, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Arkansas City, Kansas, 67005, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Newton, Kansas, 67114, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Wichita, Kansas, 67205, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Wichita, Kansas, 67207, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40509, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Madisonville, Kentucky, 42431, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21742, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Lutherville, Maryland, 21093, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02135, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Chaska, Minnesota, 55318, United States
Forest Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Forest Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63128, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Vineland, New Jersey, 08360, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11214, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Great Neck, New York, 11021, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Great Neck, New York, 11023, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Hickory, North Carolina, 28601, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Akron, Ohio, 44302, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74135, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Bensalem, Pennsylvania, 19020, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Dallas, Texas, 75234, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, 77090, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Lake Jackson, Texas, 77566, United States
Forest Investigative Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78209, United States
Forest Investigative Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22911, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Christianburg, Virginia, 24073, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Newport News, Virginia, 23606, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23294, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Bellevue, Washington, 98402, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Lakewood, Washington, 98499, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Wenatchee, Washington, 98801, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53209, United States
Forest Investigative Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V67 2K5, Canada
Forest Investigative Site
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 1H5, Canada
Forest Investigative Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada
Forest Investigative Site
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 7V1, Canada
Forest Investigative Site
Ottawa, Ontario, K2c 3R2, Canada
Forest Investigative Site 1
Sarnia, Ontario, N7T 4X3, Canada
Forest Investigative Site 2
Sarnia, Ontario, N7T 4X3, Canada
Forest Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, MCN 2V7, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Chang L, Lembo AJ, Lavins BJ, Shiff SJ, Hao X, Chickering JG, Jia XD, Currie MG, Kurtz CB, Johnston JM. The impact of abdominal pain on global measures in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation, before and after treatment with linaclotide: a pooled analysis of two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Dec;40(11-12):1302-12. doi: 10.1111/apt.12985. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
PMID: 25312449DERIVEDLembo AJ, Schneier HA, Shiff SJ, Kurtz CB, MacDougall JE, Jia XD, Shao JZ, Lavins BJ, Currie MG, Fitch DA, Jeglinski BI, Eng P, Fox SM, Johnston JM. Two randomized trials of linaclotide for chronic constipation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 11;365(6):527-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010863.
PMID: 21830967DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Paul F.C. Eng, PhD. Director, Clinical Development
- Organization
- Forest Research Institute
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Paul F.C. Eng, PhD
Forest Laboratories
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2008
First Posted
October 3, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
January 30, 2013
Results First Posted
January 30, 2013
Record last verified: 2012-12