Romosozumab (AMG 785) in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density
A Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Multi-dose Phase 2 Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AMG 785 in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density
2 other identifiers
interventional
419
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The primary objective was to determine the effect of treatment with romosozumab versus placebo at month 12 on the percent change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women with low bone density.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 3, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 21, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 18, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 14, 2018
CompletedSeptember 22, 2022
September 1, 2022
1.7 years
May 7, 2009
November 20, 2018
September 9, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD at the Lumbar Spine
Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.
Baseline to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD at the Lumbar Spine
Baseline to 6 months
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD of the Total Hip
Baseline to 6 months
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD of the Femoral Neck
Baseline to 6 months
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Total Hip
Baseline to 12 months
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Femoral Neck
Baseline to 12 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (8)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants received placebo matching to romosozumab once a month (QM) or once every 3 months (Q3M) administered subcutaneously (SC) for up to 24 months. Participants were then rerandomized to receive denosumab 60 mg or placebo to denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months from months 24 to 36. From months 36 to 48 participants received romosozumab 210 mg SC QM. At month 48 eligible participants received a single dose of open-label zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously, or no intervention.
Alendronate
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received open-label alendronate (ALN) 70 mg orally (PO) every week (QW) for 12 months. At month 12 participants transitioned to receive romosozumab 140 mg subcutaneously every month for an additional 12 months (months 12 to 24). Participants were then rerandomized to receive denosumab 60 mg or placebo to denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months from months 24 to 36. At month 36 participants ended study participation.
Teriparatide
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received open-label teriparatide 20 μg subcutaneously every day (QD) for 12 months. At month 12 participants ended study participation.
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received double-blind romosozumab 70 mg subcutaneously every month for 24 months. Participants were then rerandomized to receive denosumab 60 mg or placebo to denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months from months 24 to 36. From months 36 to 48 participants received romosozumab 210 mg SC QM. At month 48 eligible participants received a single dose of open-label zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously, or no intervention.
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received double-blind romosozumab 140 mg subcutaneously once every 3 months for 24 months. Participants were then rerandomized to receive denosumab 60 mg or placebo to denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months from months 24 to 36. From months 36 to 48 participants received romosozumab 210 mg SC QM. At month 48 eligible participants received a single dose of open-label zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously, or no intervention.
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received double-blind romosozumab 140 mg QM subcutaneously for 24 months. Participants were then rerandomized to receive denosumab 60 mg or placebo to denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months from months 24 to 36. From months 36 to 48 participants received romosozumab 210 mg SC QM. At month 48 eligible participants received a single dose of open-label zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously, or no intervention.
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received double-blind romosozumab 210 mg Q3M subcutaneously for 24 months. Participants were then rerandomized to receive denosumab 60 mg or placebo to denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months from months 24 to 36. From months 36 to 48 participants received romosozumab 210 mg SC QM. At month 48 eligible participants received a single dose of open-label zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously, or no intervention.
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received double-blind romosozumab 210 mg QM subcutaneously for 24 months. Participants were then rerandomized to receive denosumab 60 mg or placebo to denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months from months 24 to 36. From months 36 to 48 participants received romosozumab 210 mg SC QM. At month 48 eligible participants received a single dose of open-label zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously, or no intervention.
Interventions
Teriparatide 20 μg administered by subcutaneous injection once a day
Administered by subcutaneous injection
Denosumab 60 mg administered by subcutaneous injection Q6M
Administered by subcutaneous injection Q6M
Zoledronic acid 5 mg administered intravenously
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ambulatory, postmenopausal women, aged ≥ 55 to ≤ 85
- Low BMD measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and assessed by the central imaging vendor (equivalent to T-scores between -2.0 and -3.5)
You may not qualify if:
- History of vertebral fracture, or fragility fracture of the wrist, humerus, hip or pelvis after age 50
- Untreated hyper- or hypothyroidism
- Current hyper- or hypoparathyroidism, hypo- or hypercalcemia
- Elevated transaminases
- Significantly impaired renal function
- Positive for: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis-C or hepatitis-B surface antigen
- Malignancy
- History of solid organ or bone marrow transplants
- Use of agents affecting bone metabolism
- Contraindicated or intolerant of alendronate therapy
- Contraindicated or intolerant of teriparatide therapy
- \- Normocalcemia at or after the Month 21 visit but before the Month 24 study visit
- Incidence of a clinical vertebral fracture or fragility fracture of the wrist, humerus, hip or pelvis during the initial 24 month treatment phase of the study
- A BMD loss of ≥ 7.0% from baseline at any time up to the Month 18 visit of the initial 24-month treatment phase
- Malignancy
- +17 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amgenlead
Related Publications (8)
Genant HK, Engelke K, Bolognese MA, Mautalen C, Brown JP, Recknor C, Goemaere S, Fuerst T, Yang YC, Grauer A, Libanati C. Effects of Romosozumab Compared With Teriparatide on Bone Density and Mass at the Spine and Hip in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass. J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Jan;32(1):181-187. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2932. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
PMID: 27487526BACKGROUNDKeaveny TM, Crittenden DB, Bolognese MA, Genant HK, Engelke K, Oliveri B, Brown JP, Langdahl BL, Yan C, Grauer A, Libanati C. Greater Gains in Spine and Hip Strength for Romosozumab Compared With Teriparatide in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass. J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Sep;32(9):1956-1962. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3176. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
PMID: 28543940BACKGROUNDKendler DL, Bone HG, Massari F, Gielen E, Palacios S, Maddox J, Yan C, Yue S, Dinavahi RV, Libanati C, Grauer A. Bone mineral density gains with a second 12-month course of romosozumab therapy following placebo or denosumab. Osteoporos Int. 2019 Dec;30(12):2437-2448. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05146-9. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
PMID: 31628490BACKGROUNDMcClung MR, Brown JP, Diez-Perez A, Resch H, Caminis J, Meisner P, Bolognese MA, Goemaere S, Bone HG, Zanchetta JR, Maddox J, Bray S, Grauer A. Effects of 24 Months of Treatment With Romosozumab Followed by 12 Months of Denosumab or Placebo in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2, Parallel Group Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Aug;33(8):1397-1406. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3452. Epub 2018 May 22.
PMID: 29694685BACKGROUNDMcClung MR, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Reginster JY, Langdahl BL, Maddox J, Shi Y, Rojeski M, Meisner PD, Grauer A. A single dose of zoledronate preserves bone mineral density for up to 2 years after a second course of romosozumab. Osteoporos Int. 2020 Nov;31(11):2231-2241. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05502-0. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
PMID: 32623487BACKGROUNDMcClung MR, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Reginster JY, Langdahl BL, Shi Y, Timoshanko J, Libanati C, Chines A, Oates MK. Skeletal responses to romosozumab after 12 months of denosumab. JBMR Plus. 2021 Jun 3;5(7):e10512. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10512. eCollection 2021 Jul.
PMID: 34258507BACKGROUNDPoole KE, Treece GM, Pearson RA, Gee AH, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Goemaere S, Grauer A, Hanley DA, Mautalen C, Recknor C, Yang YC, Rojeski M, Libanati C, Whitmarsh T. Romosozumab Enhances Vertebral Bone Structure in Women With Low Bone Density. J Bone Miner Res. 2022 Feb;37(2):256-264. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4465. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
PMID: 34738660BACKGROUNDMcClung MR, Grauer A, Boonen S, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Diez-Perez A, Langdahl BL, Reginster JY, Zanchetta JR, Wasserman SM, Katz L, Maddox J, Yang YC, Libanati C, Bone HG. Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 30;370(5):412-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305224. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
PMID: 24382002DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Amgen Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2009
First Posted
May 11, 2009
Study Start
June 3, 2009
Primary Completion
February 21, 2011
Study Completion
February 18, 2016
Last Updated
September 22, 2022
Results First Posted
December 14, 2018
Record last verified: 2022-09