NCT00880243

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is:

  1. 1.To compare priming with Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) during induction and consolidation courses versus no priming.
  2. 2.To compare as consolidation timed sequential chemotherapy versus four courses of high dose cytarabine.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
473

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 1999

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 1999

Completed
7.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2006

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2006

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 8, 2009

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 13, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

April 13, 2009

Status Verified

April 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

7.5 years

First QC Date

April 8, 2009

Last Update Submit

April 10, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

Acute myeloid leukemiaPrimingGM-CSFTimed-sequential chemotherapyPrognosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessing the potential value of the daily administration of GM-CSF during induction chemotherapy and post-induction for analyzing and comparing the arms with and without GM-CSF: EFS, % of CR, duration of remission, OS and toxicity of each treatment.

    72 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluate the effectiveness on DFS of a single course of consolidation using a very intensive sequential chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, AraC and etoposide feasible compared to 4 courses of high dose AraC followed of 4 courses of maintenance.

    72 months

Study Arms (4)

EMA+GM-CSF

EXPERIMENTAL

* Daunorubicine (CérubidineR) : 80 mg/m2/jour IV over 30 min from day 1 to day 3, * AraC (AracytineR) : 500 mg/m2/jour IV from day 1 to day 3, * Mitoxantrone (NovantroneR) : 12 mg/m2/jour IV over 30 min from day 8 to 9 * AraC (AracytineR) : 500 mg/m2/12h IV over 3 hours from day 8 to day10. * GM-CSF (LeucomaxR): 5 µg/kg/jour IV over 6 hours from day 1 to day 10.

Drug: GM-CSF

EMA without GM-CSF

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

* Daunorubicine (CérubidineR) : 80 mg/m2/jour IV over 30 min from day 1 to day 3, * AraC (AracytineR) : 500 mg/m2/jour IV from day 1 to day 3, * Mitoxantrone (NovantroneR) : 12 mg/m2/jour IV over 30 min from day 8 to 9 * AraC (AracytineR) : 500 mg/m2/12h IV over 3 hours from day 8 to day10.

Drug: GM-CSF

HD AraC+ GM-CSF

EXPERIMENTAL

* AraC (Aracytine) : 3 g/m2/12h IV (3 hours) on days 1, 3 , 5 * GM-CSF :5 µg/kg/d IV (6 hours) from day1 to day 5

Drug: GM-CSF

HD-AraC without GM-CSF

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

\- AraC (Aracytine) : 3 g/m2/12h IV (3 hours) on days 1, 3 , 5

Drug: GM-CSF

Interventions

GM-CSFDRUG

Randomization 1: GM-CSF (5micogram/Kg/d) versus no GM-CSF during induction chemotherapy and all consolidation courses. Randomiization 2: Consolidation high dose AraC versus consolidation EMA

Also known as: GM-CSF: molgramostim, AraC: Cytarabine, Daunorubicine: Cerubidine, EMA: etoposide, mitoxantrone, cytarabine
EMA without GM-CSFEMA+GM-CSFHD AraC+ GM-CSFHD-AraC without GM-CSF

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • A morphologically proven diagnosis of AML according to the WHO classification
  • Serum creatinine \< 2N; AST and ALT \< 2.5N; total bilirubin \< 2N (unless related to the underlying disease).
  • ECOG performance status 0 to 2.
  • Women of child-bearing must use acceptable contraceptive methods, and must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 2 weeks prior the beginning treatment on this trial.
  • Must be able and willing to give written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with M3-AML. Patient with AML following diagnosed myeloproliferation or patient with prior history of MDS known for more than 3 months. Patients with AML secondary to previous treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiotherapy (therapy-related AML).
  • Patient presenting any diagnosis of uncontrolled or metastatic tumor.
  • Patients with uncontrolled severe infection,

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Thomas X, Raffoux E, Botton Sd, Pautas C, Arnaud P, de Revel T, Reman O, Terre C, Corront B, Gardin C, Le QH, Quesnel B, Cordonnier C, Bourhis JH, Elhamri M, Fenaux P, Preudhomme C, Michallet M, Castaigne S, Dombret H. Effect of priming with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in younger adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) Group. Leukemia. 2007 Mar;21(3):453-61. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404521. Epub 2007 Jan 25.

  • Thomas X, Elhamri M, Raffoux E, Renneville A, Pautas C, de Botton S, de Revel T, Reman O, Terre C, Gardin C, Chelghoum Y, Boissel N, Quesnel B, Hicheri Y, Bourhis JH, Fenaux P, Preudhomme C, Michallet M, Castaigne S, Dombret H. Comparison of high-dose cytarabine and timed-sequential chemotherapy as consolidation for younger adults with AML in first remission: the ALFA-9802 study. Blood. 2011 Aug 18;118(7):1754-62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-349258. Epub 2011 Jun 20.

  • Boissel N, Nibourel O, Renneville A, Gardin C, Reman O, Contentin N, Bordessoule D, Pautas C, de Revel T, Quesnel B, Huchette P, Philippe N, Geffroy S, Terre C, Thomas X, Castaigne S, Dombret H, Preudhomme C. Prognostic impact of isocitrate dehydrogenase enzyme isoforms 1 and 2 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: a study by the Acute Leukemia French Association group. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 10;28(23):3717-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.2285. Epub 2010 Jul 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Interventions

Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorMitoxantroneCytarabine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leukemia, MyeloidLeukemiaNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colony-Stimulating FactorsGlycoproteinsGlycoconjugatesCarbohydratesHematopoietic Cell Growth FactorsCytokinesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsProteinsBiological FactorsAnthraquinonesAnthronesAnthracenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsQuinonesPolycyclic CompoundsCytidinePyrimidine NucleosidesPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsArabinonucleosidesNucleosidesNucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides

Study Officials

  • XAVIER THOMAS, MD, PhD

    Hospices Civils de Lyon

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2009

First Posted

April 13, 2009

Study Start

March 1, 1999

Primary Completion

September 1, 2006

Study Completion

September 1, 2006

Last Updated

April 13, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-04