Effect of Priming During Induction and Consolidations in Younger Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Effect of Priming With Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor During Chemotherapy and Comparison of Timed Sequential Chemotherapy vs 4 Courses of High Dose Cytarabine as Consolidation in Younger Adults With Newly Diagnosed AML
1 other identifier
interventional
473
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is:
- 1.To compare priming with Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) during induction and consolidation courses versus no priming.
- 2.To compare as consolidation timed sequential chemotherapy versus four courses of high dose cytarabine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Mar 1999
Longer than P75 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 1999
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2009
CompletedApril 13, 2009
April 1, 2009
7.5 years
April 8, 2009
April 10, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessing the potential value of the daily administration of GM-CSF during induction chemotherapy and post-induction for analyzing and comparing the arms with and without GM-CSF: EFS, % of CR, duration of remission, OS and toxicity of each treatment.
72 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the effectiveness on DFS of a single course of consolidation using a very intensive sequential chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, AraC and etoposide feasible compared to 4 courses of high dose AraC followed of 4 courses of maintenance.
72 months
Study Arms (4)
EMA+GM-CSF
EXPERIMENTAL* Daunorubicine (CérubidineR) : 80 mg/m2/jour IV over 30 min from day 1 to day 3, * AraC (AracytineR) : 500 mg/m2/jour IV from day 1 to day 3, * Mitoxantrone (NovantroneR) : 12 mg/m2/jour IV over 30 min from day 8 to 9 * AraC (AracytineR) : 500 mg/m2/12h IV over 3 hours from day 8 to day10. * GM-CSF (LeucomaxR): 5 µg/kg/jour IV over 6 hours from day 1 to day 10.
EMA without GM-CSF
ACTIVE COMPARATOR* Daunorubicine (CérubidineR) : 80 mg/m2/jour IV over 30 min from day 1 to day 3, * AraC (AracytineR) : 500 mg/m2/jour IV from day 1 to day 3, * Mitoxantrone (NovantroneR) : 12 mg/m2/jour IV over 30 min from day 8 to 9 * AraC (AracytineR) : 500 mg/m2/12h IV over 3 hours from day 8 to day10.
HD AraC+ GM-CSF
EXPERIMENTAL* AraC (Aracytine) : 3 g/m2/12h IV (3 hours) on days 1, 3 , 5 * GM-CSF :5 µg/kg/d IV (6 hours) from day1 to day 5
HD-AraC without GM-CSF
ACTIVE COMPARATOR\- AraC (Aracytine) : 3 g/m2/12h IV (3 hours) on days 1, 3 , 5
Interventions
Randomization 1: GM-CSF (5micogram/Kg/d) versus no GM-CSF during induction chemotherapy and all consolidation courses. Randomiization 2: Consolidation high dose AraC versus consolidation EMA
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A morphologically proven diagnosis of AML according to the WHO classification
- Serum creatinine \< 2N; AST and ALT \< 2.5N; total bilirubin \< 2N (unless related to the underlying disease).
- ECOG performance status 0 to 2.
- Women of child-bearing must use acceptable contraceptive methods, and must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 2 weeks prior the beginning treatment on this trial.
- Must be able and willing to give written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with M3-AML. Patient with AML following diagnosed myeloproliferation or patient with prior history of MDS known for more than 3 months. Patients with AML secondary to previous treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiotherapy (therapy-related AML).
- Patient presenting any diagnosis of uncontrolled or metastatic tumor.
- Patients with uncontrolled severe infection,
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Acute Leukemia French Associationlead
- Hospices Civils de Lyoncollaborator
Related Publications (3)
Thomas X, Raffoux E, Botton Sd, Pautas C, Arnaud P, de Revel T, Reman O, Terre C, Corront B, Gardin C, Le QH, Quesnel B, Cordonnier C, Bourhis JH, Elhamri M, Fenaux P, Preudhomme C, Michallet M, Castaigne S, Dombret H. Effect of priming with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in younger adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) Group. Leukemia. 2007 Mar;21(3):453-61. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404521. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
PMID: 17252021RESULTThomas X, Elhamri M, Raffoux E, Renneville A, Pautas C, de Botton S, de Revel T, Reman O, Terre C, Gardin C, Chelghoum Y, Boissel N, Quesnel B, Hicheri Y, Bourhis JH, Fenaux P, Preudhomme C, Michallet M, Castaigne S, Dombret H. Comparison of high-dose cytarabine and timed-sequential chemotherapy as consolidation for younger adults with AML in first remission: the ALFA-9802 study. Blood. 2011 Aug 18;118(7):1754-62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-349258. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
PMID: 21690555DERIVEDBoissel N, Nibourel O, Renneville A, Gardin C, Reman O, Contentin N, Bordessoule D, Pautas C, de Revel T, Quesnel B, Huchette P, Philippe N, Geffroy S, Terre C, Thomas X, Castaigne S, Dombret H, Preudhomme C. Prognostic impact of isocitrate dehydrogenase enzyme isoforms 1 and 2 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: a study by the Acute Leukemia French Association group. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 10;28(23):3717-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.2285. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
PMID: 20625116DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
XAVIER THOMAS, MD, PhD
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2009
First Posted
April 13, 2009
Study Start
March 1, 1999
Primary Completion
September 1, 2006
Study Completion
September 1, 2006
Last Updated
April 13, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-04