Confirmatory Study of Indacaterol in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A 52-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Indacaterol (300 µg o.d.) Using Salmeterol (50 µg b.i.d.) as an Active Control in Japanese Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
1 other identifier
interventional
186
1 country
37
Brief Summary
This study is designed to collect long term safety data of indacaterol (300 µg o.d.) in Japanese patients with moderate to severe COPD. Data from this study will be used for the registration of indacaterol in Japan.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Mar 2009
37 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 8, 2011
CompletedNovember 8, 2011
October 1, 2011
1.6 years
April 3, 2009
October 4, 2011
October 4, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
The Number of Participants With a Clinically Notable Pulse Rate During 52 Weeks of Treatment
The number of participants with newly occurring or worsening clinically notable vital sign: Pulse Rate in beats per minute (bpm) at anytime post baseline (BL) by treatment. Low Pulse Rate was defined as a pulse rate \<40 bpm or \<= to 50 bpm and a decrease from baseline \>= to 15 bpm. High Pulse Rate was defined as a pulse rate \>130 bpm or \>= to 120 bpm and an increase from baseline \>= to 15 bpm.
52 weeks
The Number of Participants With a Clinically Notable Systolic Blood Pressure During 52 Weeks of Treatment
The number of participants with newly occurring or worsening clinically notable vital sign: Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) at anytime post baseline (BL) by treatment. A Low Systolic Blood Pressure was defined as a systolic blood pressure measurement: \<75 mmHg or \<= to 90 mmHg and a decrease from baseline \>= to 20 mmHg. A High Systolic Blood Pressure was defined as a systolic blood pressure measurement: \>200 mmHg or \>= to 180 mmHg and an increase from baseline \>= to 20 mmHg.
52 weeks
The Number of Participants With a Clinically Notable Diastolic Blood Pressure During 52 Weeks of Treatment
The number of participants with newly occurring or worsening clinically notable vital sign: Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) at anytime post baseline (BL) by treatment. A Low Diastolic Blood Pressure was defined as a diastolic blood pressure measurement: \<40 mmHg or \<= to 50 mmHg and a decrease from baseline \>= to 15 mmHg. A High Diastolic Blood Pressure was defined as a diastolic blood pressure measurement: \>115 mmHg or \>= to 105 mmHg and an increase from baseline \>= to 15 mmHg.
52 weeks
The Number of Participants With a Clinically Notable QTc Interval Value During 52 Weeks of Treatment
The number of participants with newly occurring or worsening clinically notable QTc Interval value at anytime post baseline. The QTc interval is calculated using Fridericia's formula: QTc= QT/cube root RR. QTc is the interval between the Q and T waves corrected for heart rate and RR is the interval between two R waves in milliseconds (ms). Notable QTc interval \>450 ms for males and \>470 ms for females. The maximum QTc increase from baseline at any time during the study was also tabulated with absolute and relative frequencies for categories 30- 60 ms and \>60 ms.
52 weeks
Serum Potassium (mmol/L) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 44, and 52
The least squares mean of the serum potassium in mmol/L at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 44 and 52. Mixed model used baseline serum potassium as a covariate.
4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 44, and 52 weeks
Blood Glucose (mmol/L) 1 Hour Post Dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 44, and 52
The least squares mean of the blood glucose in mmol/L at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 44 and 52. Mixed model used baseline blood glucose as a covariate.
4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 44, and 52 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After 12, 24 and 52 Weeks
After 12, 24 and 52 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Indacaterol 300 µg
EXPERIMENTALIndacaterol 300 μg once a day (o.d.) delivered via single dose dry powder inhaler (SDDPI). Daily ICS monotherapy, if needed, was allowed to remain stable throughout study. Salbutamol was available for rescue use throughout study.
Salmeterol 50 µg
ACTIVE COMPARATORSalmeterol 50 μg twice a day (b.i.d.) delivered via Diskus®. Daily ICS monotherapy, if needed, was allowed to remain stable throughout study. Salbutamol was available for rescue use throughout study.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Diagnosis of COPD (moderate-to-severe as classified by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Guidelines) and:
- Smoking history of at least 20 pack-years
- Post-bronchodilator FEV1 \<80% and ≥30% of the predicted normal value
- Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC (forced vital capacity) \<70%
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have been hospitalized for a COPD exacerbation in the 6 weeks prior to Visit 1 or during the run-in period
- Patients who have had a respiratory tract infection within 6 weeks prior to Visit 1
- Patients with concomitant pulmonary disease
- Patients with a history of asthma
- Patients with diabetes Type I or uncontrolled diabetes Type II
- Any patient with lung cancer or a history of lung cancer
- Patients with a history of certain cardiovascular comorbid conditions
- Patients who have been exposed to indacaterol previously. (Except for any patient who enrolled in Study CQAB149B1302)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (37)
Novartis Investigator Site
Asahikawa, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Bunkyō City, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Gifu, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Hamamatsu, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Himeji, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Hiroshima, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Iwata, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Kanazawa, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Kasaoka, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Kawasaki, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Kishiwada, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Kitakyushu, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Kochi, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Koga, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Kurume, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Kyoto, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Maebashi, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Matsusaka, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Morioka, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Nagaoka, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Nagoya, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Naka-gun, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Noda, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Obihiro, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Sakai, Japan
Novartis Investigator site
Sapporo, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Sendai, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Setagaya-ku, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Sumida-ku, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Tenri, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Tokyo, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Ube, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Wakayama, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Yabu, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Yanagawa, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Yokkaichi, Japan
Novartis Investigator Site
Yokohama, Japan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2009
First Posted
April 7, 2009
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
October 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
November 8, 2011
Results First Posted
November 8, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-10