A Comparison of Two Freezing Techniques
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the best way to freeze eggs in order to preserve the fertility potential of young women.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedOctober 10, 2012
October 1, 2012
2 years
February 25, 2009
October 8, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Achievement of a pregnancy, as determined by a fetal heartbeat
2 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of eggs that result in blastocyst formation
1 week
Oocyte survival (the percentage of eggs that survive the freeze-thaw procedure)
2 days
ICSI fertilization rate (percentage of eggs that fertilize)
2 days
Incidence rate of embryo formation (percentage of embryos formed/number of eggs fertilized)
2 days
Study Arms (2)
slow freeze
EXPERIMENTALthese recipients will have their first embryo transfer with oocytes frozen via the slow freeze method.
vitrification
EXPERIMENTALthese recipients will have their first attempt at an embryo transfer with oocytes frozen via the vitrification method.
Interventions
retrieved oocytes from the donor will be split in half and frozen by both existing egg freezing methods: slow freezing and vitrification. The recipients will then be randomized as to which group of eggs will be thawed out for their first attempt at achieving a pregnancy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- donors: women ages 21-32 who wish to donate their eggs; must pass medical, physical and psychological screening.
- recipients: women under the age of 50 who wish to have eggs donated to them through the Donor Egg Program and who aslo pass the medical, physical and psychological screening.
You may not qualify if:
- donors: those who do not pass the genetic screening or psychological testing, as described below
- recipients: those who do not pass the screening.
- The genetic screening of donors will involve the following:
- All donors will be screened for Cystic Fibrosis, Fragile X and Spinomuscular Atrophy (SMA).
- In addition, donors of Ashkenazi Jewish origin will be screened for Gaucher's disease, Canavan,Tay -Sachs, Familial Dysautonomia, Niemann Pick, Fanconi's Anemia, Bloom and Mucolipidosis Type IV.
- Donors of African-American origin will be screened for Sickle-Cell disease.
- Donors of Asian, Mediterranean, Latino or Hispanic origins will be screened for Thalassemia.
- Recipient Screening: A Reproductive Endocrinologist (RE) at the Center will take a detailed history and perform a physical examination on all potential recipients. The RE will assess the health of the potential recipient in order to assess her capacity to carry a pregnancy. Previous IVF cycles, successful or unsuccessful, will have no implication on recipient selection.
- The recipient and her partner (if applicable) will meet with the program psychologist. The psychological evaluation is detailed below.
- Psychological evaluation: A psychological evaluation will be conducted of the Recipient, her partner (if applicable) and the Donor. The purpose of these evaluations is to determine the suitability of the parties to participate in the Donor Egg Program. Psychological tests will be administered by the Center as part of the evaluation process.
- These evaluations may result in a recommendation that one and/or all of the parties not participate in the Donor Egg Program. The psychologist will not be providing any advice or treatment to the Donor or Recipient(s). Nor will the Donor or Recipient(s) be entitled to the results of the Psychologist's evaluation. The Psychologist will provide the results of his/her evaluations to the Center for Human Reproduction.
- As with our standard Donor Egg Program practices, there will be an upper age limit of 50 years for all recipients participating in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwell Healthlead
- EMD Seronocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030, United States
Related Publications (21)
Cohen J, Alikani M, Trowbridge J, Rosenwaks Z. Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Hum Reprod. 1992 May;7(5):685-91. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137720.
PMID: 1639990BACKGROUNDDiaz DG, Rodriguez-Karl MC and Moody JE (2007) Human oocyte cryopreservation: preliminary results of survival, fertilization and cleavage rate of frozen oocyte using a new modified slow-freeze protocol. Fertil Steril 88, Suppl 1:S47.
BACKGROUNDSmith GD, Serafini PC, Fioravanti J, Yadid I, Coslovsky M, Hassun P, Alegretti JR, Motta EL. Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2088-95. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
PMID: 20171613BACKGROUNDFosas N, Marina F, Torres PJ, Jove I, Martin P, Perez N, Arnedo N, Marina S. The births of five Spanish babies from cryopreserved donated oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2003 Jul;18(7):1417-21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg297.
PMID: 12832365BACKGROUNDGook DA, Edgar DH. Human oocyte cryopreservation. Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(6):591-605. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmm028. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
PMID: 17846105BACKGROUNDHershlag A, Paine T, Kvapil G, Feng H, Napolitano B. In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection split: an insemination method to prevent fertilization failure. Fertil Steril. 2002 Feb;77(2):229-32. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02978-8.
PMID: 11821076BACKGROUNDJain JK, Paulson RJ. Oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2006 Oct;86(4 Suppl):1037-46. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1478.
PMID: 17008147BACKGROUNDKumayama M and Kato O (2000a) Successful vitrification of human oocytes. Fertil Steril 74, Suppl 3:S49.
BACKGROUNDKumayama M and Kato O (2000b) All-round vitrification method for human oocytes and embryos. J Asst Reprod Gen 17:447.
BACKGROUNDKuzan FB and Quinn P (1988) Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos IN in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a manual of basic techniques. Plenum Press, New York.
BACKGROUNDLi Y, Feng HL, Cao YJ, Zheng GJ, Yang Y, Mullen S, Critser JK, Chen ZJ. Confocal microscopic analysis of the spindle and chromosome configurations of human oocytes matured in vitro. Fertil Steril. 2006 Apr;85(4):827-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.06.064.
PMID: 16580356BACKGROUNDNagy ZP, Chang CC, Shapiro DB, Bernal DP, Elsner CW, Mitchell-Leef D, Toledo AA, Kort HI. Clinical evaluation of the efficiency of an oocyte donation program using egg cryo-banking. Fertil Steril. 2009 Aug;92(2):520-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
PMID: 18692830BACKGROUNDOktay K, Cil AP, Bang H. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2006 Jul;86(1):70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.017.
PMID: 16818031BACKGROUNDPalermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992 Jul 4;340(8810):17-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-f.
PMID: 1351601BACKGROUNDPaynter SJ. Current status of the cryopreservation of human unfertilized oocytes. Hum Reprod Update. 2000 Sep-Oct;6(5):449-56. doi: 10.1093/humupd/6.5.449.
PMID: 11045876BACKGROUNDPorcu E, Venturoli S. Progress with oocyte cryopreservation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;18(3):273-9. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000193015.96275.2d.
PMID: 16735826BACKGROUNDTucker M, Wright G, Morton P, Shanguo L, Massey J, Kort H. Preliminary experience with human oocyte cryopreservation using 1,2-propanediol and sucrose. Hum Reprod. 1996 Jul;11(7):1513-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019428.
PMID: 8671495BACKGROUNDWolf DP (1991) ProH2 freeze/thaw protocol for human embryos IN OHSU procedure manual.
BACKGROUNDWu J, Zhang L, Wang X. In vitro maturation, fertilization and embryo development after ultrarapid freezing of immature human oocytes. Reproduction. 2001 Mar;121(3):389-93. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1210389.
PMID: 11226064BACKGROUNDYoon TK, Kim TJ, Park SE, Hong SW, Ko JJ, Chung HM, Cha KY. Live births after vitrification of oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2003 Jun;79(6):1323-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00258-9.
PMID: 12798878BACKGROUNDYoon TK, Chung HM, Lim JM, Han SY, Ko JJ, Cha KY. Pregnancy and delivery of healthy infants developed from vitrified oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2000 Jul;74(1):180-1. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00572-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 10899519BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Avner Hershlag, MD
Northwell Health
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Cohen, MD
Northwell Health
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Huai L Feng, PhD
Northwell Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2009
First Posted
February 26, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
February 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
October 10, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10