The Benefits of Intensive Glycemic Control in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
1 other identifier
interventional
208
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aims/hypothesis: Populations worldwide are aging and type 2 diabetes is common in individuals aged \>80 years. The important issue that needs to be considered is whether tight glycemic control is benefits for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. The benefits of intensive glucose control remain uncertain for the heterogeneous population of older diabetic patients due to a lack of clinical trial data evaluating the benefits of long-term intensive glucose control in older patients. This study is designed to provide reliable evidence on the balance of benefits and risks conferred by intensive glucose control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, open-labeled, controlled design to assess the benefits of treating elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. The study will include 208 elderly patients with type 2 diabetes and follow-up for 5 years. Eligible patients are randomized to receive intensive (A1C \<7.0%) or conservative (A1C around 8.0%) glycemic control. The primary study outcomes are a composite of macrovascular events and a composite of microvascular events, considered both jointly and separately. The secondary outcomes are death from any cause, death from cardiovascular causes, total coronary events, total cerebrovascular events, heart failure, peripheral vascular events, all cardiovascular events, and hospitalization for 24 hours or more. Expected results: This study is designed to provide reliable evidence on the balance of benefits and risks conferred by intensive and conservative glucose control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. Once completed, this trial will clearly influence the management of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes, regardless of the results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable type-2-diabetes
Started Feb 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable type-2-diabetes
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedJuly 26, 2010
June 1, 2010
5.8 years
February 23, 2009
July 23, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary study outcomes are a composite of macrovascular events and a composite of microvascular events, considered both jointly and separately.
Every 6 months and up to 5 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The secondary outcomes are death from any cause, disability from any cause, total coronary events, total cerebrovascular events, heart failure, peripheral vascular events, all cardiovascular events, and hospitalization for 24 hours or more.
Every 6 months and upto 5 years
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALFasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) 90 to 130 Glycated hemoglobin (%) 6.0 to 7.0
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORFasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) 90 to 180 Glycated hemoglobin (%) 7.0 to 9.0
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men or women aged ≥80 years at time of randomization.There is no upper age limit.
- Be able to walk by themselves
- They had their first diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus at age 30 years or older.
You may not qualify if:
- Known advanced diabetic complications (such as proliferative retinopathy, chronic kidney disease stage IV or above).
- Overt clinical congestive heart failure (CHF) requiring treatment with a diuretic or ACE inhibitor.
- Previous documented cerebral or subarachnoid haemorrhage in the last 6 months
- Condition expected to severely limit survival
- Clinical diagnosis of dementia
- Resident in a nursing home
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chen-Hsen Lee
Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2009
First Posted
February 25, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
July 26, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-06