Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremity With Enhanced Proprioceptive Feedback Following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if tetraplegic individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) who remain unable to move their arms normally 1 year after their SCIs are able to sense and move the affected arm(s) better after 10-13 weeks of treatment with a new robotic therapy device. The hypothesis is that using the AMES device on the arm(s) of chronic tetraplegic subjects with incomplete SCI will result in improved strength, sensation, and functional movement in treated limb(s).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2009
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 8, 2019
CompletedMay 1, 2019
April 1, 2019
2.8 years
January 29, 2009
January 27, 2015
April 16, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Grasp Release Test
The task involves picking up, transporting, and placing six objects (i.e., peg, paperweight, fork, block, can, and videotape). Movement of each of the 6 objects is scored based on the number of times the participant can move the object in 30 seconds, with a minimum score of zero if no objects are successfully moved. A cumulative score is based on the sum of all completed movements for all 6 objects.
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
Secondary Outcomes (12)
ASIA Motor Key Muscles
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
ASIA (ISNCSCI) Sensory/Key Sensory Points/ Light-Touch
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
ASIA (ISNCSCI) Sensory/Key Sensory Points/Pin-Prick
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
Van Lieshout Hand Function Test for Tetraplegia- Short Version
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
Modified Ashworth Scale
Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
AMES treatment
EXPERIMENTALThe subject will receive 25 treatment sessions, conducted 2-3 times per week on the AMES device. Each session will consist of testing followed by 30 minutes of wrist and finger rehabilitation using the AMES device.
Interventions
The AMES device rotates the fingers-thumb or the wrist in the flexion-extension directions over a range of 30 degrees while vibrators stimulate the tendons attached to muscles that are lengthened by the thumb-finger or hand movement. A treatment consists of 20 minutes of fingers-thumb movement, followed by 10 minutes of wrist movement. The subject's task is to assist the motion of the device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Traumatic SCI with tetraplegia.
- Male or female.
- yrs old.
- At least 1 yr post-SCI.
- Tolerate sitting upright at for at least one hour.
- Able to perceive direction of passive joint(s) motion of the upper extremity(ies) to be treated 70% or more of the times tested.
- Motor grade \>1 in the wrist extensors, finger flexors and finger abductors (the 3 muscles related to hand movements in the ASIA scale) in the upper extremity tested.
- Cognitively and behaviorally capable of complying with the regimen.
You may not qualify if:
- Fracture of the treated limb resulting in loss of range of motion
- Concomitant TBI or stroke (Patients who sustained mild head injury during the trauma with no evidence of structural abnormalities on brain images will qualify for the study)
- DVT of the treated extremity
- Peripheral nerve injury of the treated extremity
- Osteo- or rheumatoid-arthritis limiting range of motion
- Contractures equal to or greater than 50% of the normal ROM
- Skin condition not tolerant of device
- Progressive neurodegenerative disorder
- Botox treatment of the treated extremity in the prior 5 month
- Chronic ITB therapy
- Uncontrolled seizure disorder
- Uncontrolled high blood pressure/angina
- Pain in affected limb or exercise intolerance
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oregon Health and Science Universitylead
- Shepherd Center, Atlanta GAcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Shepherd Center
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97006, United States
Related Publications (1)
Cordo P, Lutsep H, Cordo L, Wright WG, Cacciatore T, Skoss R. Assisted movement with enhanced sensation (AMES): coupling motor and sensory to remediate motor deficits in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jan;23(1):67-77. doi: 10.1177/1545968308317437. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
PMID: 18645190RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1. Not a controlled study. 2. Zone of partial preservation not fully characterized. 3. Changes in somatosensation were not quantified. 4. Five participants were trained for both ULs, so training of first UL may have affected second UL.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Paul Cordo
- Organization
- Oregon Health & Science University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul J. Cordo, Ph.D
Oregon Health and Science University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Deborah Backus, PhD, PT
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Study Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2009
First Posted
January 30, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
November 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 1, 2019
Results First Posted
April 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04