Conditioning Neural Circuits to Improve Upper Extremity Function
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Non-invasive brain stimulation has gained increasing popularity and research support over the past several years. Recent research indicates that it might have benefits for improving hand function in people with spinal cord injury. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of a type of non-invasive brain stimulation, known as tDCS, on hand function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 9, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 17, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 17, 2019
CompletedJuly 29, 2020
July 1, 2020
2.4 years
November 18, 2015
July 27, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Quantitative Prehension Ability (GRASSP subtest)
Pre-, post-, and follow-up upper extremity impairment and function
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change in Upper Extremity Strength (Grip and Pinch Strength)
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Change in Upper Extremity Sensation (Semmes-Weinstein)
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Change in Perceived Upper Extremity Performance & Satisfaction (COPM)
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Short-term change in Quantitative Prehension Ability (Abbreviated GRASSP) subtest)
weekly during 4-week treatment period
Classification of Upper Extremity Function (BHUEF)
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
tDCS + FTP group
EXPERIMENTALThis group of individuals with tetraplegia will receive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the hand area of their primary motor cortex (M1). Stimulation at 2mA will be applied for 20 minutes while subjects complete a total of 1 hour of functional task practice (FTP) per session. (Only 20 minutes of functional task practice be be performed with stimulation on). 3 sessions will be completed per week for 4 weeks.
PNSS + FTP group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group of individuals with tetraplegia will receive peripheral nerve somatosensory stimulation (PNSS) to the median nerve of the primary hand being trained. Stimulation will be set to elicit a sensory - not motor - response. Stimulation will be performed concurrently with the entire functional task practice (FTP) session. 3 sessions will be completed per week for 4 weeks.
sham tDCS + FTP group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group of individuals with tetraplegia will receive sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the hand area of their primary motor cortex (M1) alongside functional task practice. Stimulation will be briefly turned on at the beginning of FTP and again after 20 minutes of practice in order to create a sham effect and maintain blinding of the participants. 3 sessions will be completed per week for 4 weeks.
Interventions
High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation is applied over the hand area of the primary motor cortex (M1). Parameters= 2mA for 20 minutes. Functional task practice will be completed concurrently with tDCS and for approximate 40 minutes after the stimulation stops.
Electrical stimulation will be applied to the median nerve of the primary hand being trained at parameters that elicit a sensory but not motor response (called "peripheral nerve somatosensory stimulation"). Stimulation parameters are 100Hz with a 250uS pulse width. Stimulation intensity will vary between 1-10mA per participant. Stimulation will be applied for 1 hour and functional task practice will be completed concurrent with the stimulation.
During sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a sham tDCS device will be used along with functional task practice. The sham tDCS unit will be used for the first 20 minutes of FTP, followed by an additional 40 minutes of FTP.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be 18-65 years of age
- Have a cervical (neurological level C1-C8) SCI that occurred either \<6 months ago (subacute) or \>1 year (chronic) prior to the time of enrollment
- For subjects with acute/subacute SCI: the injury must be a traumatic injury (i.e. not the result of illness or a condition within the body)
- Have ISNCSCI severity classification (A, B, C or D)
- Have self-reported limitations in arm and hand function in at least one upper limb (a GRASSP quantitative score of no more than 26/30 in the hand that is the focus of treatment)
- Have the ability to pick up objects with at least one hand without using assistive devices (a GRASSP quantitative score of at least 4/30 in the hand that is the focus of treatment)
- Have shoulder strength lift an arm up to chest level
- Have the ability to sit for at least one hour at a time (e.g. good skin integrity, stable blood pressure)
- For subjects with acute/subacute SCI: adequate time remaining in their treatment at Shepherd Center to allow 5 weeks of participation
- For subjects with chronic SCI: active hand function is required (see Pre-intervention assessment) reliable transportation in order to complete the intervention in its entirety
- Ability and willingness to consent and authorize use of personal health information
You may not qualify if:
- Pacemaker or a metal implant in the head
- Current pregnancy
- Severe shoulder weakness, injury, or pain that contraindicates repetitive fine motor training
- Lower motor neuron damage (as documented in medical record, per participant report, or as noted by in-person screening)
- Severe hypersensitivity or pain of the arm/hand
- Severe contractures of the arm/hand that would limit participation in fine motor training
- Prior tendon or nerve transfer surgery
- Have a history of seizures
- Have a history of frequent or severe headaches
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Shepherd Center, Atlanta GAlead
- United States Department of Defensecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Shepherd Center, Inc.
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, United States
Related Publications (13)
Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
PMID: 20633386BACKGROUNDGomes-Osman J, Field-Fote EC. Bihemispheric anodal corticomotor stimulation using transcranial direct current stimulation improves bimanual typing task performance. J Mot Behav. 2013;45(4):361-7. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2013.808604. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
PMID: 23796102BACKGROUNDAnderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004 Oct;21(10):1371-83. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371.
PMID: 15672628BACKGROUNDBiering-Sorensen F, Bryden A, Curt A, Friden J, Harvey LA, Mulcahey MJ, Popovic MR, Prochazka A, Sinnott KA, Snoek G. International spinal cord injury upper extremity basic data set. Spinal Cord. 2014 Sep;52(9):652-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.87. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
PMID: 24891012BACKGROUNDBeekhuizen KS, Field-Fote EC. Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation: effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005 Mar;19(1):33-45. doi: 10.1177/1545968305274517.
PMID: 15673842BACKGROUNDHoffman LR, Field-Fote EC. Cortical reorganization following bimanual training and somatosensory stimulation in cervical spinal cord injury: a case report. Phys Ther. 2007 Feb;87(2):208-23. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050365. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
PMID: 17213410BACKGROUNDHoffman LR, Field-Fote EC. Functional and corticomotor changes in individuals with tetraplegia following unimanual or bimanual massed practice training with somatosensory stimulation: a pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010 Dec;34(4):193-201. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181fbe692.
PMID: 21084920BACKGROUNDGomes-Osman J, Field-Fote EC. Cortical vs. afferent stimulation as an adjunct to functional task practice training: a randomized, comparative pilot study in people with cervical spinal cord injury. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Aug;29(8):771-82. doi: 10.1177/0269215514556087. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
PMID: 25381344BACKGROUNDBirkenmeier RL, Prager EM, Lang CE. Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Sep;24(7):620-35. doi: 10.1177/1545968310361957. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
PMID: 20424192BACKGROUNDCharlifue S, Post MW, Biering-Sorensen F, Catz A, Dijkers M, Geyh S, Horsewell J, Noonan V, Noreau L, Tate D, Sinnott KA. International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set. Spinal Cord. 2012 Sep;50(9):672-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.27. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
PMID: 22450884BACKGROUNDKalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Curt A, Duff S, Popovic MR, Rudhe C, Fehlings MG, Verrier MC. The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Mar 20;29(5):905-14. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1504. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
PMID: 21568688BACKGROUNDLohse KR, Boyd LA, Hodges NJ. Engaging Environments Enhance Motor Skill Learning in a Computer Gaming Task. J Mot Behav. 2016;48(2):172-82. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2015.1068158. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
PMID: 26296097BACKGROUNDVelstra IM, Curt A, Frotzler A, Abel R, Kalsi-Ryan S, Rietman JS, Bolliger M. Changes in Strength, Sensation, and Prehension in Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: European Multicenter Responsiveness Study of the GRASSP. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Sep;29(8):755-66. doi: 10.1177/1545968314565466. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
PMID: 25567122BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edelle C Field-Fote, PT, PhD
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2015
First Posted
November 20, 2015
Study Start
February 9, 2017
Primary Completion
July 17, 2019
Study Completion
July 17, 2019
Last Updated
July 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share