Comparison of Video-Based Versus Written Patient Education on Melanoma
Comparison of Video-based Versus Written Patient Education on Melanoma
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of video-based patient education with written instruction on subjects' understanding of melanoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2009
CompletedApril 22, 2015
April 1, 2015
4 months
January 20, 2009
April 20, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Knowledge of melanoma detection.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Subjects' comprehension and attitude towards video-based and written education materials.
1 month
Study Arms (2)
Video-based education arm:
EXPERIMENTALSubjects receiving the video-based educational material
Written education arm:
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects receiving the written educational material
Interventions
In the experimental arm, the intervention is the video-based patient educational material on melanoma. In the active comparison arm (control arm), the comparison intervention is written patient educational material on melanoma.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older at time of consent, may be men or women.
- Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
- Capable of giving informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-English speaking individuals.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California Davis Department of Dermatology
Sacramento, California, 95816, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
April W Armstrong, MD
University of California, Davis
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2009
First Posted
January 22, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Study Completion
July 1, 2009
Last Updated
April 22, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04