NCT00805220

Brief Summary

The elderly are the fastest growing proportion of the population. Ageism implies a decline of physical functions affecting functional and safe ambulation. Based on the ICF model intervening in walking capacity could have favourable impact on quality of life of frail elders. Over ground walking training is indicated as a possible exercise. However, to achieve positive results on walking capacity, an exercise-dose response is needed. A more intensive way of promoting walking training is to add skiing poles while walking, a technique called Nordic Walking (NW). This study will be the first to compare NW with usual walking training. It aims to estimate for frail elderly the relative efficacy in improving functional walking capacity of two gait training strategies: NW and usual walking training and explore its impact on fear of falling. This study hypothesized that participants receiving Nordic Walking will walk longer, faster and fear less. NW if proven effective will positively impact on the functional capacities and quality of life of frail elders and provide an more intense method of walking training.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2008

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2008

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 8, 2008

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2008

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2009

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

September 2, 2009

Status Verified

September 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

December 8, 2008

Last Update Submit

September 1, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

frail elderly walking capacity walk training Nordic Walking

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • 6 Minute Walk Test 5 Meter Walk Test Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale

    Baseline, 3 weeks follow-up, 8 weeks follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Berg Balance Scale; CHAMPS; Lower Extremity Functional Scale; Visual Analogue Scale of Pain; EuroQol 5D.

    Baseline, 3 weeks follow-up, 8 weeks follow-up

Study Arms (2)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Regular overground walking without poles

Other: Nordic Walking

2

EXPERIMENTAL

Nordic Walking

Other: Nordic Walking

Interventions

Walking training with and without poles will be twice a week. The sessions last 20 minutes each and consist of walking, stretching and mobility exercises. This will last 8 weeks in a total of 16 sessions. A therapist will closely monitor your exercises and modify them according to your needs and comfort

Also known as: PoleStriding, Exerstriding
12

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old or more
  • undergoing rehabilitation program or living a residence facility
  • medically stable or in their usually state of health.

You may not qualify if:

  • severe cognitive impairments (short mini mental score less than 14/18)47
  • unable to ambulate a minimum of 15 meters with or without aids
  • without mobility restrictions as represented by a gait speed greater than 1.2 m/s
  • moderate to severe limitations of upper extremity represented by a shoulder flexion range of motion (ROM) less than 90 degrees and extension less than 20 degrees; elbow flexion ROM less than 90 degrees; and with a poor grip judged by the ability to release a can of 5 cm diameter
  • pathological or musculoskeletal conditions of the upper extremity
  • individuals unable to attend a minimum of eight weeks of intervention.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Geriatric Day Hospital (GDH) at the Royal Victoria Hospital (RVH)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Location

Richardson Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Figueiredo S, Finch L, Mai J, Ahmed S, Huang A, Mayo NE. Nordic walking for geriatric rehabilitation: a randomized pilot trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Jun;35(12):968-75. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.717580. Epub 2012 Oct 15.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Nordic Walking

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

WalkingLocomotionMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological PhenomenaExerciseMotor Activity

Study Officials

  • Nancy Mayo, BSc MSc PhD

    McGill University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2008

First Posted

December 9, 2008

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion

June 1, 2009

Study Completion

August 1, 2009

Last Updated

September 2, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-09

Locations