Dacarbazine for Metastatic Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma
Determination of Tumor Response Rate by RECIST and FDG-PET Criteria to Dacarbazine in Metastatic Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the overall best tumor response rate to dacarbazine given until disease progression as assessed by RECIST criteria, CT and clinical exams in patients with metastatic sarcomas.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Mar 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 13, 2017
CompletedFebruary 13, 2017
December 1, 2016
5.8 years
December 4, 2008
June 16, 2016
December 20, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Best Anatomical Tumor Response
* Complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions, disappearance of all non-target lesions, normalization of tumor level marker * Partial response (PR): at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD, persistence of one or more non-target lesion and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the upper limits of normal * Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage in target lesions to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease taking as references the smallest sum LD since the treatment started, persistence of one or more non-target lesion and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits of normal * Progressive disease (PD): at least 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions and/or appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions
After completion of 3 cycles
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Rate of Neutropenia (Grade 3/4)
Completion of 6 cycles of treatment (18 weeks)
Rate of Nausea/Emesis (Any Grade)
Completion of 6 cycles of treatment (18 weeks)
Comparison of the SUV at up to 3 Tumor Sites
Baseline and after every three cycles of treatment (up to 1 year)
Overall Tumor Metabolic Response
After completion of 3 cycles
Correlate the Tumor Metabolic Response Rate With the Tumor Anatomic Response Rate
After completion of 3 cycles
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Dacarbazine
EXPERIMENTALDacarbazine 850 mg/m\^2 IV Day 1 of each 21 day cycle.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically proven diagnosis of soft tissue or bone sarcoma
- Metastatic or locally recurrent and unresectable sarcoma which progressed after one or more prior chemotherapy regimens (excluding adjuvant chemotherapy).
- At least one measurable tumor lesion (by CT scan) At least one FDG avid (SUV ≥ 3) tumor lesion (by PET/CT) which must have been performed at this institution. At least one of these target lesions must be ≥ 1.5 cm in smallest dimension as measured on the baseline CT
- Age greater than 18 yrs old
- ECOG Performance Status of 0-2
- Baseline ANC ≥ 1000/uL, Hgb ≥ 8 Gr/dL, platelets ≥ 100,000/ dL.
- Baseline serum creatinine \</= 2.0 mg/dL
- Baseline serum total bilirubin \</= 2.0, AST or ALT \< 3x ULN
- No active infection
- Signed Informed Consent by patient or legally authorized representative
You may not qualify if:
- Current pregnancy or breast feeding.
- A serious uncontrolled medical disorder that in the opinion of the Investigator would impair the ability of the subject to receive protocol therapy.
- Chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or investigational agents given with the last 21 days.
- Investigational agents given with the last 30 days
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. (Subjects with a fasting blood glucose \> 200 at time of PET scanning may need to reschedule to another day after consulting with appropriate physicians.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Related Publications (5)
Antman K, Crowley J, Balcerzak SP, Rivkin SE, Weiss GR, Elias A, Natale RB, Cooper RM, Barlogie B, Trump DL, et al. An intergroup phase III randomized study of doxorubicin and dacarbazine with or without ifosfamide and mesna in advanced soft tissue and bone sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Jul;11(7):1276-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.7.1276.
PMID: 8315425BACKGROUNDGottlieb JA, Benjamin RS, Baker LH, O'Bryan RM, Sinkovics JG, Hoogstraten B, Quagliana JM, Rivkin SE, Bodey GP Sr, Rodriguez V, Blumenschein GR, Saiki JH, Coltman C Jr, Burgess MA, Sullivan P, Thigpen T, Bottomley R, Balcerzak S, Moon TE. Role of DTIC (NSC-45388) in the chemotherapy of sarcomas. Cancer Treat Rep. 1976 Feb;60(2):199-203.
PMID: 769974BACKGROUNDBuesa JM, Mouridsen HT, van Oosterom AT, Verweij J, Wagener T, Steward W, Poveda A, Vestlev PM, Thomas D, Sylvester R. High-dose DTIC in advanced soft-tissue sarcomas in the adult. A phase II study of the E.O.R.T.C. Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Ann Oncol. 1991 Apr;2(4):307-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057942.
PMID: 1868027BACKGROUNDBorden EC, Amato DA, Rosenbaum C, Enterline HT, Shiraki MJ, Creech RH, Lerner HJ, Carbone PP. Randomized comparison of three adriamycin regimens for metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 1987 Jun;5(6):840-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.6.840.
PMID: 3585441BACKGROUNDChoi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria SC, Macapinlac HA, Burgess MA, Patel SR, Chen LL, Podoloff DA, Benjamin RS. Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1753-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.3049.
PMID: 17470865BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Brian Van Tine, M.D., Ph.D.
- Organization
- Washington University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brian Van Tine, M.D., Ph.D.
Washington Univerisity School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2008
First Posted
December 5, 2008
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 13, 2017
Results First Posted
February 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-12