Response To Oral Agents in Diabetes (ROAD)- Pilot Study
ROAD
2 other identifiers
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This proposal is to fund a pilot study to assess feasibility and refine methodology for an intended large Scotland wide study on Response to Oral Agents in Diabetes (ROAD). The study will collect cohorts of patients who have carefully controlled standardised dose titration and monitoring with an assessment of drug response and side effects over a 6 month period. The primary aim will be to use these cohorts to investigate phenotypic and genotypic (pharmacogenetic) determinants of response. Drug naïve patients will be treated with Metformin. Patients who have failed on Metformin or are intolerant of Metformin will be randomised to gliclazide, pioglitazone or sitagliptin. With the ability to capture patient data beyond 6 months via data linkage we will monitor time to treatment failure and therefore compare which of the 3 oral agents is the best therapy to use after Metformin in a cost efficient and "real world" RCT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Dec 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 26, 2017
CompletedOctober 26, 2017
October 1, 2017
10 months
October 27, 2008
May 24, 2017
October 25, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
HbA1c Change
Units are absolute difference in %HbA1c (HbA1c being the percentage of glycated Haemoglobin, reflecting glucose exposure over the last 3 months)
6 months
Study Arms (4)
Gliclazide MR
ACTIVE COMPARATORSitagliptin
ACTIVE COMPARATORPioglitazone
ACTIVE COMPARATORMetformin
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
30mg daily increased to 60mg if HbA1c \> 7% at 3 months
Pioglitazone 30mg daily , increased to 45mg daily if HbA1c \>7% at 3 months. 6 months duration
Metformin 500 mg od for 1 week, bd for 1 week, 1g mane 500 mg nocte 1 week, 1g bd there after. Total of 6 months treatment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cohort 1 - metformin treatment
- Type 2 diabetes diagnosed more than 6 weeks prior to visit 1
- GP considers adequate diet and lifestyle advice given
- Age \>35 and \< 80
- Age of diabetes diagnosis \>35
- White European
- HbA1c \>7% \& \<=9%
- eGFR\>=50 ml/min
- ALT \<= 2.5\*ULN
- Contactable by telephone
- Cohort 2 - 2nd line treatment
- Type 2 diabetes
- Treated with metformin for more than 3 months; or metformin intolerant
- Age \>35 and \< 80
- Age of diabetes diagnosis \>35
- +8 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Cohort 1
- Type 1 diabetes
- HbA1c \>9% or \<=7%
- eGFR\<50 ml/min
- ALT \> 2.5\*ULN
- Alcohol consumption in excess of 50 units per week
- Pregnancy, lactation or a female planning to conceive within the study period
- Cohort 2
- Type 1 diabetes
- HbA1c \>9% or \<=7%
- eGFR\< 50 ml/min
- ALT \> 2.5\*ULN
- Previous history of heart failure OR documented evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction OR symptoms and signs consistent with a clinical diagnosis of heart failure
- Ongoing treatment with Gemfibrozil or Rifampicin (CYP2C8 inhibitor or inducer respectively); or with Miconazole or phenylbutazone (increased hypoglycemic effect of gliclazide).
- Previous diagnosis of osteoporosis
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ninewells Hospital & Medical School
Dundee, DD1 9SY, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Note that this study was a pilot study and was not designed or powered to show significance of differences in outcomes between groups. Primary aim was to demonstrate efficacy of novel route of recruitment from primary care.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Professor Ewan Pearson
- Organization
- University of Dundee
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ewan R Pearson
University of Dundee
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Diabetic Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2008
First Posted
October 28, 2008
Study Start
December 1, 2008
Primary Completion
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
October 1, 2009
Last Updated
October 26, 2017
Results First Posted
October 26, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10