NCT00772330

Brief Summary

Assess the safety and performance of the Miami InnFocus Drainage Implant in patients suffering from glaucoma that is inadequately controlled on tolerated medical therapy with intraocular pressure greater than or equal to 18 mm Hg and less than or equal to 40 mm Hg.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2007

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2007

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 13, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 15, 2008

Completed
8.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2017

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 14, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 14, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

9.1 years

First QC Date

October 13, 2008

Results QC Date

January 26, 2021

Last Update Submit

June 23, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

MIDI ArrowGlaucoma Drainage DeviceGDDInnFocusGlaucoma treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With Treatment Performance Success

    Success: IOP \< 15 mmHg or IOP reduced from baseline (pre-operative level) by ≥ 20% (without glaucoma reoperation, such as a trabeculectomy to improve aqueous drainage or implantation of another drainage implant).

    Day 1, Day 7, Week 3, Week 6, Month 3, Month 9, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Maintenance of Pressure Control

    Day 1, Day 7, Week 3, Week 6, Month 3, Month 9, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60

Other Outcomes (8)

  • Procedure Feasibility

    Day 1

  • Time (in Minutes) Taken for the Procedure

    Day 1

  • Visual Acuity

    Day 1, Day 7, Week 3, Week 6, Month 3, Month 9, Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 48 and Month 60

  • +5 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

MIDI Arrow

EXPERIMENTAL

Ab externo glaucoma drainage device with no reservoir

Device: Glaucoma Drainage Device

Interventions

Insertion of MIDI Arrow subconjunctivally with a fornix-based incision after pretreatment of scleral surface with 0.4 mg/mL MMC and insertion of MIDI Arrow tube through sclera into anterior chamber of eye

MIDI Arrow

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female, age 18 to 85 years, inclusive
  • Glaucoma that is inadequately controlled on tolerated medical therapy with intraocular pressure greater than or equal to 18 mm Hg and less than or equal to 40 mm Hg.
  • Patient must have signed informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Unwilling or unable to give informed consent or unable to return for scheduled protocol visits
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • No light perception
  • Active iris neovascularization or active proliferative retinopathy
  • Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome
  • Epithelial or fibrous downgrowth
  • Aphakia (without pseudophakia)
  • Vitreous in anterior chamber for which a vitrectomy is anticipated
  • Chronic or recurrent uveitis
  • Severe posterior blepharitis
  • Unwilling to discontinue contact lens use after surgery
  • Previous ophthalmic surgery, excluding uncomplicated phacoemulsification (cataract) surgery or corneal refractive surgery
  • Need for glaucoma surgery combined with other ocular procedures other than cataract surgery (i.e., penetrating keratoplasty or retinal surgery) or anticipated need for additional ocular surgery
  • Known allergy to Mitomycin C (MMC) drug.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Laser Center

Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Garcia-Feijoo J, Batlle JF, Aptel F, Lachkar Y, Riss I, Sadruddin O, Nguyen T, Beckers HJM. Pooled Analysis of Three MicroShunt Studies in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Evaluating Different Concentrations of Applied Mitomycin C. Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Jul;14(7):1533-1549. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01149-4. Epub 2025 May 23.

  • Batlle JF, Corona A, Albuquerque R. Long-term Results of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma From a Single-center Nonrandomized Study. J Glaucoma. 2021 Mar 1;30(3):281-286. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001734.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Interventions

Glaucoma Drainage Implants

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ocular HypertensionEye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostheses and ImplantsEquipment and Supplies

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sharon Herbert, Associate Director of Clinical Operations
Organization
InnFocus, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Juan F Batlle, MD

    Laser Center, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2008

First Posted

October 15, 2008

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion

November 1, 2016

Study Completion

January 1, 2017

Last Updated

July 14, 2021

Results First Posted

July 14, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Locations