NCT05797350

Brief Summary

A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Paul glaucoma implant and Ahmed glaucoma valve in refractory childhood glaucoma patients

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 12, 2023

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 4, 2023

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 4, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

March 12, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 2, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • IOP Reduction

    More than 20% change from baseline without development of vision threatening complications

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Glaucoma Medication Alterations

    1 year

  • Post-operative complications

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

Paul Glaucoma Implant

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) will be used as an active comparator group to compare its effectiveness and safety with the Ahmed glaucoma valve in the treatment of childhood glaucoma. The PGI works by diverting excess fluid from the eye to a plate placed under the conjunctiva, which allows the fluid to drain away from the eye and be absorbed. This helps to lower the pressure inside the eye, which is important for preventing vision loss and other complications associated with glaucoma. The PGI has a smaller internal and external tube diameter than the Ahmed glaucoma valve, which reduces the contact area between the tube and the corneal endothelium. This theoretically reduces the rate of endothelial cell loss, which can be a complication of GDDs. Additionally, the extraocular portion of the PGI is smaller, which may reduce the long-term risk of tube erosion and exposure. The smaller lumen may theoretically reduce the risk of postoperative hypotony as well.

Device: Glaucoma Drainage Device

Ahmed Glaucoma valve

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) arm of the study is the active comparator group and is intended to be directly compared to the Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) in treating childhood glaucoma. The AGV is a type of glaucoma drainage device that is designed to lower intraocular pressure in patients with refractory glaucoma. It is made of a rigid plastic material and consists of a small drainage tube that is inserted into the eye and a valve mechanism that helps regulate the flow of aqueous humor from the eye to the external drainage tube. The AGV is implanted during a surgical procedure, and its design allows it to be placed in a variety of locations in the eye. The valve mechanism helps to regulate the flow of aqueous humor, and the device is designed to be long-lasting with a low risk of complications. The AGV is a well-established treatment option for patients with refractory glaucoma and has been used for many years in clinical practice.

Device: Glaucoma Drainage Device

Interventions

Both the Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) and Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) are types of glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) used to lower intraocular pressure in patients with refractory glaucoma. Devices will be implanted during a surgical procedure and work by diverting excess fluid from the eye to an external drainage tube, allowing the fluid to drain away from the eye and be absorbed into the surrounding tissue. This will help to lower the pressure inside the eye, which is important for preventing vision loss and other complications associated with glaucoma.

Ahmed Glaucoma valvePaul Glaucoma Implant

Eligibility Criteria

Age0 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Childhood glaucoma patients (whether primary or secondary) including Juvenile open angle glaucoma if the age at the time of surgery was ≤18 years.
  • The included patients are those with refractory glaucoma who require a tube to control their intraocular pressure.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any patient with incomplete data or has a follow-up less than 1 year will be excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Maadi eye subspeciality center

Cairo, Egypt

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Interventions

Glaucoma Drainage Implants

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ocular HypertensionEye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostheses and ImplantsEquipment and Supplies

Central Study Contacts

Mohamed ElBaharwy

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2023

First Posted

April 4, 2023

Study Start

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion

June 1, 2024

Study Completion

December 1, 2024

Last Updated

April 4, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations