Evaluation of a Health at Every Size vs a Behavioral Weight Loss Approach for Obese Women
Comparative Health Improvements and Rate of Relapse in Weight-Centered vs. Wellness-Centered Interventions for Obese Women
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
For over four decades the medical literature has observed a relationship between obesity and poorer health outcomes. The causal mechanisms of these poorer outcomes however are unclear. One assumption that has been supported by correlational data is that increased weight is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (i.e., hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes). Consequently, obese people are routinely prescribed weight loss programs in order to prevent or control these conditions. Unfortunately, long term weight loss has been met with minimal success for the large majority of people. Furthermore, the data suggesting that weight loss leads to long term health benefits and decreased mortality is limited and contradictory. The purpose of the proposed project is to perform a randomized controlled pilot study comparing the effectiveness of two lifestyle interventions for preventing CVD risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes). The interventions are constitutionally similar; however, the treatment condition is a wellness-focused intervention that teaches healthy living without consideration of weight. The control condition is a traditional curriculum where the prescribed outcome is weight loss. The primary goals of both programs are to reduce hypertension and total cholesterol, and to enhance glucose control. Secondary outcomes of interest are psychological and behavioral in nature (e.g., self-esteem; depressed mood; anxiety; stress; quality of life; dietary habits; and physical activity). We will compare the trajectories of the CVD and psychological/behavioral risk factors for a total period of 24 months (including the time from baseline to the end of the 6-month intervention). Our objectives are to collect data to a) determine whether participants in both programs reduce CVD and psychological/behavioral risk factors at the completion of the 6-month program, and b) compare the persistency of health improvements and rate of relapse at the end of the 18-month follow-up period between the traditional weight loss intervention and the wellness-focused intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable obesity
Started Sep 2008
Typical duration for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 25, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 25, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 25, 2011
CompletedDecember 3, 2019
November 1, 2019
2.4 years
October 8, 2008
November 27, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Blood Lipids
LDL, HDL, Total Cholesterol, Triglycerides (mg/dL)
Baseline, post-intervention, 18-24 months post intervention
Blood Pressure
Systolic and Diastolic (mmHg)
Baseline, post-intervention, 18-24 months post intervention
Fasting Blood Glucose
measured in mg/DL
Baseline, post-intervention, 18-24 months post intervention
Waist and Hip Circumference
measured in inches
Baseline, post-intervention, 18-24 months post intervention
Waist-to-Hip ratio
waist in inches/hips in inches
Baseline, post-intervention, 18-24 months post intervention
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Disordered eating attitudes and behaviors
baseline, post intervention, 18-24 months post intervention
Intuitive eating behaviors
baseline, post intervention, 18-24 months post intervention
Maladaptive eating behaviors
baseline, post intervention, 18-24 months post intervention
Fruit and vegetable intake
baseline, post intervention, 18-24 months post intervention
Physical activity
baseline, post intervention, 18-24 months post intervention
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Internalized weight stigma (putative mediator and moderator)
baseline, post intervention,18-24 months post intervention
Study Arms (2)
Wellness-Centered
EXPERIMENTALA health at every size intervention, the HUGS program was conceived and developed in 1987 by Linda Omichinski, Registered Dietitian. HUGS stands for Health focused, Understanding lifestyle, Group supported, and Self-esteem building. It is an integrated approach that promotes healthy eating, active living, and self acceptance regardless of weight. HUGS teaches strategies to recognize and respond to physiological signs of hunger and satiety to determine food intake. The manualized curriculum is accompanied by the books Tailoring Your Tastes and Staying Off of the Diet Roller Coaster which participants will receive in addition to a booklet of handouts. Kelly Bliss, a psychotherapist and fitness professional with 17 years experience in health-centered approaches for weight management, will deliver the intervention in 2 groups of 20 people that meet weekly for 6 months.
Weight-Centered
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe LEARN Program for Weight Management is an evidence-based behavior modification approach to weight loss developed by Dr. Kelly Brownell, Ph.D. Psychologist. LEARN is an acronym that stands for Lifestyle, Exercise, Attitudes, Relationships, and Nutrition. This manualized curriculum shares many principals with the HUGS program in that both emphasize the importance of healthy lifestyle choices and gradual sustainable change. However, the LEARN program makes weight loss an explicit goal and focuses more on food intake levels based on external prescriptions and caloric restriction. Participants in the LEARN program will receive the LEARN Program for Weight Management manual and the LEARN Weight Stabilization and Maintenance Guide along with the LEARN Program CD set. Ann Wellock, a Registered Dietician from The Reading Hospital and Medical Center will deliver the intervention in 2 groups of 20 people that meet weekly for 6 months.
Interventions
A health at every size intervention, the HUGS program was conceived and developed in 1987 by Linda Omichinski, Registered Dietitian. HUGS stands for Health focused, Understanding lifestyle, Group supported, and Self-esteem building. It is an integrated approach that promotes healthy eating, active living, and self acceptance regardless of weight. HUGS teaches strategies to recognize and respond to physiological signs of hunger and satiety to determine food intake. The manualized curriculum is accompanied by the books Tailoring Your Tastes and Staying Off of the Diet Roller Coaster which participants will receive in addition to a booklet of handouts. Kelly Bliss, a psychotherapist and fitness professional with 17 years experience in health-centered approaches for weight management, will deliver the intervention in 2 groups of 20 people that meet weekly for 6 months.
The LEARN Program for Weight Management is an evidence-based behavior modification approach to weight loss developed by Dr. Kelly Brownell, Ph.D. Psychologist. LEARN is an acronym that stands for Lifestyle, Exercise, Attitudes, Relationships, and Nutrition. This manualized curriculum shares many principals with the HUGS program in that both emphasize the importance of healthy lifestyle choices and gradual sustainable change. However, the LEARN program makes weight loss an explicit goal and focuses more on food intake levels based on external prescriptions and caloric restriction. Participants in the LEARN program will receive the LEARN Program for Weight Management manual and the LEARN Weight Stabilization and Maintenance Guide along with the LEARN Program CD set. Ann Wellock, a Registered Dietician from The Reading Hospital and Medical Center will deliver the intervention in 2 groups of 20 people that meet weekly for 6 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women ages 30 to 45 years old (at intervention onset);
- BMI between 30 and 45
- Physically inactive
- Practicing birth control if heterosexually active and pre-menopausal.
- English speaking
You may not qualify if:
- Current smoker
- Use of medications known to affect weight/energy expenditure;
- Pregnant, intending to get pregnant over next two years, or lactating;
- Recent myocardial infarction (within 6 months);
- Congestive heart failure
- Active neoplasms
- Type 1 and insulin-dependent Type 2 diabetes
- Cerebrovascular disease
- Renal disease
- Cirrhosis
- Bulimia nervosa
- Alcohol and/or Substance Abuse
- Major psychiatric disturbance (suicidality, psychosis, anti-social personality disorder, current manic episode)
- Prior bariatric surgery
- Plans to have bariatric surgery over next 2.5 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Reading Hospital and Medical Center
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611, United States
Related Publications (3)
Mensinger JL, Calogero RM, Stranges S, Tylka TL. A weight-neutral versus weight-loss approach for health promotion in women with high BMI: A randomized-controlled trial. Appetite. 2016 Oct 1;105:364-74. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
PMID: 27289009RESULTMensinger JL, Calogero RM, Tylka TL. Internalized weight stigma moderates eating behavior outcomes in women with high BMI participating in a healthy living program. Appetite. 2016 Jul 1;102:32-43. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.033. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
PMID: 26829370RESULTMensinger, J. L., & Meadows, A. (2017). Internalized weight stigma mediates and moderates physical activity outcomes during a healthy living program for women with high body mass index. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 30, 64-72. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.01.010
RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Janell L Mensinger, Ph.D.
Villanova University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- There was full allocation concealment through the 3-month recruitment phase of the trial.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Research Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2008
First Posted
October 9, 2008
Study Start
September 25, 2008
Primary Completion
February 25, 2011
Study Completion
February 25, 2011
Last Updated
December 3, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11