Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy
COLD
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for the removal and retrieval of small colorectal polyps. Cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is expected to be more effective than conventional polypectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Sep 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2009
CompletedNovember 18, 2015
November 1, 2015
11 months
September 29, 2008
November 17, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complete removal rate of colorectal polyps
two weeks after each polypectomy
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Complication rate
two weeks after each polypectomy
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTAL2
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The removal of small colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is performed using cold snare polypectomy.
The removal of small colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is performed using conventional polypectomy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men or women between 20 and 100 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant, American Society of Anesthesiologists class III and IV
- Overweight (body weight \> 100 kg)
- Allergic to the drugs used or its components (soybeans or eggs)
- Poor bowel preparation or post-colorectal surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Showa Inan General hospital
Komagane, Nagano, 399-4191, Japan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Digestive Disease Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2008
First Posted
October 1, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
September 1, 2009
Last Updated
November 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11