A New Method for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Colon Capsule Endoscopy Compared to Conventional Endoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
59
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction: Prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) is feasible through polypectomy on screening colonoscopy. Patient acceptance remains the main limiting factor for execution. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) might be a novel method for large populations. Aims and methods: Patients referred for screening means or lower gastrointestinal complaints were included in this single center pilot study. They underwent preparation and then ingested the capsule (PillCam Colon). Standard colonoscopy was performed the next morning. Significance was defined as polyps \>5mm in size. Performance of exams was by independent physician with blinding of results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Nov 2007
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2009
CompletedOctober 7, 2009
October 1, 2009
6 months
October 6, 2009
October 6, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary endpoint was the number of cancerous lesions and polyps detected on CCE compared to conventional colonoscopy
7 Months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary endpoints were completeness of the exam completeness, patient acceptance and adherence to preparation regimen
7 Months
Study Arms (1)
Colon capsule endoscopy and colonoscopy
EXPERIMENTALPatients underwent CCE on day 1 and conventional colonoscopy on day 2
Interventions
The PillCam® Colon Capsule is 11mm x 31mm in size (Figure 1), is equipped with two cameras acquiring pictures from both ends of the capsule at a rate of 4 frames per second (2 pictures per second and camera). The PillCam® Colon Capsule is automatically activated when it is removed from the package. It enters sleeping mode after approximately 10 minutes and starts transmitting again 1 h 45 min later. It has a total operating time of 8 - 10 hours. During the examination the patient wears a sensor array which is attached to the abdominal skin and a data recorder for storage of the information generated by the ingested capsule. After the examination the data are downloaded into the Given Imaging workstation and a video is generated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- male/female above the age of 50 years with symptoms (Indication for screening)
- male/female above the age of 50 years without symptoms
- male/female younger than 50 years without symptoms but with a positive family history for colorectal cancer (CRC) (Indication for screening)
You may not qualify if:
- CRC in the patient's history
- cardiac pacemaker
- contraindications for sodium phosphate solution (Colophos®)
- risk factors for capsule retention including surgical intestinal anastomosis, Crohn's disease, diverticulitis and radiologically suspected bowel obstruction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital
Basel, Canton of Basel-City, 4031, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Pilz JB, Portmann S, Peter S, Beglinger C, Degen L. Colon Capsule Endoscopy compared to Conventional Colonoscopy under routine screening conditions. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun 18;10:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-66.
PMID: 20565828DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julia B Pilz, MD
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Christoph Beglinger, MD
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- STUDY CHAIR
Lukas Degen, MD
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2009
First Posted
October 7, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2007
Primary Completion
May 1, 2008
Study Completion
May 1, 2008
Last Updated
October 7, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-10