NCT00991003

Brief Summary

Introduction: Prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) is feasible through polypectomy on screening colonoscopy. Patient acceptance remains the main limiting factor for execution. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) might be a novel method for large populations. Aims and methods: Patients referred for screening means or lower gastrointestinal complaints were included in this single center pilot study. They underwent preparation and then ingested the capsule (PillCam Colon). Standard colonoscopy was performed the next morning. Significance was defined as polyps \>5mm in size. Performance of exams was by independent physician with blinding of results.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
59

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2007

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2007

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2008

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 6, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 7, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

October 7, 2009

Status Verified

October 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

October 6, 2009

Last Update Submit

October 6, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

Colon Capsule EndoscopyColorectal CancerColonoscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary endpoint was the number of cancerous lesions and polyps detected on CCE compared to conventional colonoscopy

    7 Months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Secondary endpoints were completeness of the exam completeness, patient acceptance and adherence to preparation regimen

    7 Months

Study Arms (1)

Colon capsule endoscopy and colonoscopy

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients underwent CCE on day 1 and conventional colonoscopy on day 2

Procedure: Colon capsule endoscopyProcedure: Conventional Colonoscopy

Interventions

The PillCam® Colon Capsule is 11mm x 31mm in size (Figure 1), is equipped with two cameras acquiring pictures from both ends of the capsule at a rate of 4 frames per second (2 pictures per second and camera). The PillCam® Colon Capsule is automatically activated when it is removed from the package. It enters sleeping mode after approximately 10 minutes and starts transmitting again 1 h 45 min later. It has a total operating time of 8 - 10 hours. During the examination the patient wears a sensor array which is attached to the abdominal skin and a data recorder for storage of the information generated by the ingested capsule. After the examination the data are downloaded into the Given Imaging workstation and a video is generated.

Also known as: Pillcam Colon Capsule
Colon capsule endoscopy and colonoscopy
Colon capsule endoscopy and colonoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • male/female above the age of 50 years with symptoms (Indication for screening)
  • male/female above the age of 50 years without symptoms
  • male/female younger than 50 years without symptoms but with a positive family history for colorectal cancer (CRC) (Indication for screening)

You may not qualify if:

  • CRC in the patient's history
  • cardiac pacemaker
  • contraindications for sodium phosphate solution (Colophos®)
  • risk factors for capsule retention including surgical intestinal anastomosis, Crohn's disease, diverticulitis and radiologically suspected bowel obstruction

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital

Basel, Canton of Basel-City, 4031, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Pilz JB, Portmann S, Peter S, Beglinger C, Degen L. Colon Capsule Endoscopy compared to Conventional Colonoscopy under routine screening conditions. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun 18;10:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-66.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Interventions

Endoscopy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic Techniques, SurgicalDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Julia B Pilz, MD

    University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Christoph Beglinger, MD

    University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Lukas Degen, MD

    University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2009

First Posted

October 7, 2009

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion

May 1, 2008

Study Completion

May 1, 2008

Last Updated

October 7, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-10

Locations