NCT03856255

Brief Summary

Colorectal cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Colorectal cancer screening is recommended to begin at age 50 years for most men and women at average risk for this disease. Colonoscopy is a gold standard method of screening for colorectal cancer, allowing for the detection and removal of colorectal polyps, some of which can progress into malignancy. The literature has shown that the removal of polyps during a colonoscopy results in decreased incidence and mortality related to colorectal cancer. Indeed, the last decade has shown a decline in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in adults over age 50, largely due to increased colonoscopy screening. Currently, the risk of a patient developing colorectal cancer and thus time intervals for colonoscopy surveillance post-polypectomy is determined by the number, pathology, and size of the polyps that are observed and removed during the colonoscopy procedure. Current surveillance guidelines indicate the need for a shorter interval before the next colonoscopy for patients who have one or more polyps that are 10mm or larger. In addition, different polypectomy techniques are indicated for the treatment of polyps less than 20mm in size. For example, cold forceps may be appropriate for removal of 1mm to 2mm polyps, cold snare for polyps less than 10mm, and hot-snare resection for polyps 10mm to 19mm. Yet, while the number and pathology of polyps are easily obtained and verified, it is standard practice for the size of a polyp to be assessed through endoscopist optical visualization alone, without use of an objective device or standard by which to measure it. Often, the endoscopist will compare the size of the polyp to the size of the snare loop to estimate and document the size of the polyp(s). However, with the size of a polyp being a major indicator of malignant potential as well as an indicator of appropriate polypectomy technique and surveillance intervals, a device with which to take and document accurate and objective measurements of polyps during colonoscopy holds the potential for health benefits. In addition to having a potential clinical benefit for each patient in terms of polypectomy and surveillance intervals, as an objective indicator of polyp size, this technique also holds promise for use in future studies that evaluate polyp size as an indicator of potential malignancy (or future malignancy) and for use by national clinical guidelines committees who may utilize these objective data to update future screening and surveillance recommendations.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 25, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 27, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 24, 2019

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 14, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 14, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

February 25, 2019

Results QC Date

May 18, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 18, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Number of Participants Who Indicated Ease of Use in Advancing in Measuring Device Catheter Through the Working Channel

    Scale of 1-10, with 1 being the easiest and 10 being the hardest

    At the time of the procedure

  • Mean Score Indicating Ease of Extending and Retracting the Device

    Scale of 1-10, with 1 being the easiest and 10 being the hardest

    At the time of of the procedure

  • Mean Score Indicating Ease of Use in Placing the Measuring Device Adjacent to the Polyp in Order to Determine a Measurement

    Scale of 1-10, with 1 being the easiest and 10 being the hardest

    At the time of the procedure

  • Mean Score Indicating Ease of Use in Taking a Picture That Included the Measuring Device and Polyp in Order to Photo-document the Measurement Reading

    Scale of 1-10, with 1 being the easiest and 10 being the hardest

    At the time of the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Mean Difference in Size of Polyp

    At the time of the procedure

Study Arms (1)

Micro-Tech Endoscopic Gauge

EXPERIMENTAL

Use of the device during screening or surveillance colonoscopy

Device: Micro-Tech Endoscopic Gauge

Interventions

Use of Micro-Tech Endoscopic Gauge to measure any polyp detected during a screening or surveillance colonoscopy.

Micro-Tech Endoscopic Gauge

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals age 50-85 years old, who require an outpatient screening or surveillance colonoscopy
  • Ability to give consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy
  • Inflammatory bowel disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

New York University School of Medicine

New York, New York, 10016, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Mark Pochapin, MD
Organization
NYU Langone Health

Study Officials

  • Mark Pochapin, MD

    New York School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2019

First Posted

February 27, 2019

Study Start

June 24, 2019

Primary Completion

June 1, 2020

Study Completion

June 1, 2020

Last Updated

June 14, 2021

Results First Posted

June 14, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification will be shared. Requests will be directed to mark.pochapin@nyulangone.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Data will become available beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication
Access Criteria
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal will have access to the data.

Locations