Study Stopped
Covid-19 restrictions with screening/surveillance colonoscopies
Polyp Measurement Device
A Pilot, Single-centered, Single-arm, Feasibility Study Evaluating a Polyp Measurement Device in Patients Undergoing Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Colorectal cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Colorectal cancer screening is recommended to begin at age 50 years for most men and women at average risk for this disease. Colonoscopy is a gold standard method of screening for colorectal cancer, allowing for the detection and removal of colorectal polyps, some of which can progress into malignancy. The literature has shown that the removal of polyps during a colonoscopy results in decreased incidence and mortality related to colorectal cancer. Indeed, the last decade has shown a decline in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in adults over age 50, largely due to increased colonoscopy screening. Currently, the risk of a patient developing colorectal cancer and thus time intervals for colonoscopy surveillance post-polypectomy is determined by the number, pathology, and size of the polyps that are observed and removed during the colonoscopy procedure. Current surveillance guidelines indicate the need for a shorter interval before the next colonoscopy for patients who have one or more polyps that are 10mm or larger. In addition, different polypectomy techniques are indicated for the treatment of polyps less than 20mm in size. For example, cold forceps may be appropriate for removal of 1mm to 2mm polyps, cold snare for polyps less than 10mm, and hot-snare resection for polyps 10mm to 19mm. Yet, while the number and pathology of polyps are easily obtained and verified, it is standard practice for the size of a polyp to be assessed through endoscopist optical visualization alone, without use of an objective device or standard by which to measure it. Often, the endoscopist will compare the size of the polyp to the size of the snare loop to estimate and document the size of the polyp(s). However, with the size of a polyp being a major indicator of malignant potential as well as an indicator of appropriate polypectomy technique and surveillance intervals, a device with which to take and document accurate and objective measurements of polyps during colonoscopy holds the potential for health benefits. In addition to having a potential clinical benefit for each patient in terms of polypectomy and surveillance intervals, as an objective indicator of polyp size, this technique also holds promise for use in future studies that evaluate polyp size as an indicator of potential malignancy (or future malignancy) and for use by national clinical guidelines committees who may utilize these objective data to update future screening and surveillance recommendations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 24, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 14, 2021
CompletedJune 14, 2021
May 1, 2021
11 months
February 25, 2019
May 18, 2021
May 18, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Number of Participants Who Indicated Ease of Use in Advancing in Measuring Device Catheter Through the Working Channel
Scale of 1-10, with 1 being the easiest and 10 being the hardest
At the time of the procedure
Mean Score Indicating Ease of Extending and Retracting the Device
Scale of 1-10, with 1 being the easiest and 10 being the hardest
At the time of of the procedure
Mean Score Indicating Ease of Use in Placing the Measuring Device Adjacent to the Polyp in Order to Determine a Measurement
Scale of 1-10, with 1 being the easiest and 10 being the hardest
At the time of the procedure
Mean Score Indicating Ease of Use in Taking a Picture That Included the Measuring Device and Polyp in Order to Photo-document the Measurement Reading
Scale of 1-10, with 1 being the easiest and 10 being the hardest
At the time of the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Mean Difference in Size of Polyp
At the time of the procedure
Study Arms (1)
Micro-Tech Endoscopic Gauge
EXPERIMENTALUse of the device during screening or surveillance colonoscopy
Interventions
Use of Micro-Tech Endoscopic Gauge to measure any polyp detected during a screening or surveillance colonoscopy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals age 50-85 years old, who require an outpatient screening or surveillance colonoscopy
- Ability to give consent
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Inflammatory bowel disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
New York University School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10016, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mark Pochapin, MD
- Organization
- NYU Langone Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Pochapin, MD
New York School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2019
First Posted
February 27, 2019
Study Start
June 24, 2019
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
June 14, 2021
Results First Posted
June 14, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Data will become available beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal will have access to the data.
All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification will be shared. Requests will be directed to mark.pochapin@nyulangone.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.