Safety and Efficacy of the Apexum Ablator
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Apexum Ablator in Subjects With Periapical Lesions Associated With Root Canal Infection
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The study is designed to test the hypothesis that there is a difference in healing kinetics and healing rate between teeth treated by conventional endodontic procedure alone and those in which such procedure was supplemented with the Apexum Ablator protocol
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedJune 5, 2009
June 1, 2009
3.5 years
September 29, 2008
June 4, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Healing at 6-month follow-up, defined dichotomously by whether lesion is in the process of Healing or not, indicated by whether PAI score at 6 months is at 3 or below
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Healing at 12-month follow-up.
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Apexum
EXPERIMENTALthe tooth is treated by a standard root canal treatment, supplemented by Apexum Ablator protocol, in which the periapical lesion tissue is minced and removed through the root canal, in a minimally invasive fashion.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe tooth is subject to conventional endodontic procedure alone, (standard root canal treatment)
Interventions
using the apexum kit for minimally invasive removal of periapical lesion tissue.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is \> 18 years old
- Subject has periapical lesion(s) associated with root canal infection in one or more roots that have a single root canal per root. These may include upper and lower single rooted incisors, canines or premolars, as well as roots of multi-rooted teeth, providing that they have a single root canal per root. These may include distal roots of lower molars, palatal and disto-buccal roots of upper molars
- Lesion mean diameter: 3-6 mm, PAI score 4 or 5
- Roots with mature fully formed apices
You may not qualify if:
- Previous root canal filling
- Roots with abnormal root canal morphology
- Roots with more than one root canal per root, as either evident from the pre-operative radiographs or as discovered during initiation of the root canal treatment
- A tooth that remained symptomatic after the first and when needed a second session of the root canal treatment (remained with an excessive sensitivity to percussion, persistent sinus tract, persistent exudate in the root canal etc.)
- Un-restorable teeth
- Significant periodontal pockets
- Lack of cortical bone around the lesion, as judged clinically
- Active acute infection - cellulites, abcess
- Proximity of anatomical structures to the periapical lesion to the extent that Apexum Ablator enucleation procedure may damage or otherwise jeopardize these structures. Such anatomical structures may include the maxillary sinus, the nasal cavity, the inferior alveolar nerve and its canal, the mental nerve or any other structure that may be jeopardized by the procedure
- Subject with:
- Uncontrolled systemic hypertension
- Severe uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus
- Current steroid therapy in excess of prednisone 5 mg/day
- Chronic inflammatory oral disease
- HIV positive patients
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Apexum Ltd.lead
- Monitoring: Quail CRO, Romaniacollaborator
- Medistat Ltd., Israelcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Titu Maiorescu University
Bucharest, Romania
Cabinet Stomatologic Dr Dan Dragomirescu
Timișoara, Romania
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dragos Slavescu, DMD
Titu Maiorescu University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dan Dragomirescu, DMD
Cabinet Stomatologic Dr Dan Dragomirescu
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2008
First Posted
September 30, 2008
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 5, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-06