Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation on Success of Primary Endodontic Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
70
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the success after endodontic treatment performed with or without continuous ultrasonic irrigation. 70 Mandibular molars with diagnosis of pulpal necrosis and with periapical radiolucency were randomly assigned into two treatment groups- continuous ultrasonic irrigation (CUI) and syringe irrigation (SI). Standard nonsurgical endodontic treatment was performed on both groups under rubber dam isolation with 0.02 taper ISO stainless steel hand files using step back technique. In both groups, 5 ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite was used as irrigant after each instrument. After root canal instrumentation, canals were irrigated with 5 ml of 17% EDTA solution for 1 minute. In SI group, canals were flushed with 15ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite using a 27 gauge needle while final irrigant was delivered using a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device in CUI group. An inter-appointment dressing of calcium hydroxide was given and patient was recalled after one week and canals were obturated with the Gutta Percha. Immediate postoperative radiograph was then taken, followed by radiographs at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2015
CompletedDecember 16, 2015
December 1, 2015
1 year
December 10, 2015
December 11, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Periapical Index score
Change in Periapical Index (PAI) scores (Orstavik et al) observed at 12-months was noted. Scoring of each tooth was done according to the following five point scale (PAI): PAI Score Description of radiographic findings 1. Normal periapical structures 2. Small changes in bone structure 3. Changes in bone structure with some mineral loss 4. Periodontitis with well-defined radiolucent area 5. Severe periodontitis with exacerbating features
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pain
6 hours-7 days
Study Arms (2)
continuous ultrasonic irrigation
EXPERIMENTALIn continuous ultrasonic irrigation group, Proultra PiezoFlow (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa,OK) was used for the activation of the irrigating solution according to manufacturer's recommendations.
Syringe irrigation
NO INTERVENTIONIn the syringe irrigation group, irrigation was done using 27 gauge syringe.
Interventions
In continuous ultrasonic irrigation group, Proultra PiezoFlow (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa,OK) was used for the activation of the irrigating solution according to manufacturer's recommendations.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient willingness to participate in the study
- Mature permanent mandibular molar requiring primary root canal treatment
- Patient's age greater than 18 years
- There must be radiographic evidence of periapical radiolucency (minimum size ≥ 2.0 × 2.0 mm) and a diagnosis of pulpal necrosis, as confirmed by negative response to cold and electrical tests; and absence of bleeding on entering the pulp chamber
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who did not provide authorization for participation in the study
- Positive history of antibiotic use within past one month of the treatment
- Positive history of analgesic intake within the past 24 hours
- Patients who were pregnant, diabetic, immunocompromised, had serious medical illness or required antibiotic premedication
- Patients with pockets ≥4mm or having marginal of furcal bone loss due to periodontitis
- Previously accessed teeth and/or with procedural errors
- Unrestorable tooth, fractured/ perforated roo ts, inflammatory root resorption
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2015
First Posted
December 16, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 16, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12