NCT02632513

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the success after endodontic treatment performed with or without continuous ultrasonic irrigation. 70 Mandibular molars with diagnosis of pulpal necrosis and with periapical radiolucency were randomly assigned into two treatment groups- continuous ultrasonic irrigation (CUI) and syringe irrigation (SI). Standard nonsurgical endodontic treatment was performed on both groups under rubber dam isolation with 0.02 taper ISO stainless steel hand files using step back technique. In both groups, 5 ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite was used as irrigant after each instrument. After root canal instrumentation, canals were irrigated with 5 ml of 17% EDTA solution for 1 minute. In SI group, canals were flushed with 15ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite using a 27 gauge needle while final irrigant was delivered using a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device in CUI group. An inter-appointment dressing of calcium hydroxide was given and patient was recalled after one week and canals were obturated with the Gutta Percha. Immediate postoperative radiograph was then taken, followed by radiographs at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2014

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2014

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 10, 2015

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 16, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

December 16, 2015

Status Verified

December 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

December 10, 2015

Last Update Submit

December 11, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

continuous ultrasonic irrigation, syringe irrigation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Periapical Index score

    Change in Periapical Index (PAI) scores (Orstavik et al) observed at 12-months was noted. Scoring of each tooth was done according to the following five point scale (PAI): PAI Score Description of radiographic findings 1. Normal periapical structures 2. Small changes in bone structure 3. Changes in bone structure with some mineral loss 4. Periodontitis with well-defined radiolucent area 5. Severe periodontitis with exacerbating features

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative pain

    6 hours-7 days

Study Arms (2)

continuous ultrasonic irrigation

EXPERIMENTAL

In continuous ultrasonic irrigation group, Proultra PiezoFlow (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa,OK) was used for the activation of the irrigating solution according to manufacturer's recommendations.

Device: Proultra PiezoFlow (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties)

Syringe irrigation

NO INTERVENTION

In the syringe irrigation group, irrigation was done using 27 gauge syringe.

Interventions

In continuous ultrasonic irrigation group, Proultra PiezoFlow (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa,OK) was used for the activation of the irrigating solution according to manufacturer's recommendations.

continuous ultrasonic irrigation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient willingness to participate in the study
  • Mature permanent mandibular molar requiring primary root canal treatment
  • Patient's age greater than 18 years
  • There must be radiographic evidence of periapical radiolucency (minimum size ≥ 2.0 × 2.0 mm) and a diagnosis of pulpal necrosis, as confirmed by negative response to cold and electrical tests; and absence of bleeding on entering the pulp chamber

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who did not provide authorization for participation in the study
  • Positive history of antibiotic use within past one month of the treatment
  • Positive history of analgesic intake within the past 24 hours
  • Patients who were pregnant, diabetic, immunocompromised, had serious medical illness or required antibiotic premedication
  • Patients with pockets ≥4mm or having marginal of furcal bone loss due to periodontitis
  • Previously accessed teeth and/or with procedural errors
  • Unrestorable tooth, fractured/ perforated roo ts, inflammatory root resorption

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Periapical Periodontitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Periapical DiseasesJaw DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesPeriodontitis

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2015

First Posted

December 16, 2015

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion

May 1, 2015

Study Completion

October 1, 2015

Last Updated

December 16, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-12