Performance of the Hedrocel(R) Cervical Fusion Device
1 other identifier
interventional
231
1 country
13
Brief Summary
The objective of this clinical investigation is to compare patients treated with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) using the Hedrocel Cervical Fusion Device, with a concurrent, randomized, control group receiving autologous iliac crest bone graft or allograft and test the hypothesis that ACDF with Hedrocel is non-inferior to ACDF with allograft or autologous bone graft.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Dec 2001
Longer than P75 for phase_3
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 12, 2013
CompletedAugust 23, 2013
August 1, 2013
7.1 years
September 23, 2008
May 9, 2013
August 9, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Overall Clinical Success (NDI, Fusion, Additional Surgical Procedures)
Success was defined as an improvement in patient functional capability using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) by at least 10% as compared to the pre-operative evaluation and Radiographic evidence of fusion (\< 3mm translation; \< 5° angular motion and absence of radiolucent lines around ≥ 50% of the device)and A comparison of the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications which resulted in additional surgical procedures of revision, removal or supplemental fixation at 12 months
12 Months
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is an instrument used for testing self-rated disability in neck pain patients. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) consists of 10 questions, each with a score up to 5, for a total score of 50. The lower the score, the less self-rated disability. NDI scoring: * 0 - 4 = No disability * 5 - 14 = Mild disability * 15 - 24 = Moderate disability * 25 - 34 = Severe disability * 35 or over = Complete disability
12 Months
Study Arms (8)
Experimental Arm 1
EXPERIMENTALHedrocel 1 level - No plate
Experimental Arm 2
EXPERIMENTALHedrocel 1 level with plate
Experimental Arm 3
EXPERIMENTALHedrocel 2 levels with plate
Control Arm 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORAutograft alone - Illiac crest
Control Arm 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORAutograft 1 level with plate
Control Arm 3
ACTIVE COMPARATORAllograft 1 level with plate
Control Arm 4
ACTIVE COMPARATORAutograft 2 levels with plate
Control Arm 5
ACTIVE COMPARATORAllograft 2 levels with plate
Interventions
Implantation of Hedrocel
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient has no history of previous anterior cervical fusion surgery at the involved levels.
- The patient has no history of previous cervical fusion surgery at the adjacent levels.
- The patient is willing and able to provide written informed consent.
- The patient is likely to complete the required follow-up.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient is mentally compromised (e.g., under treatment for a psychiatric disorder or has senile dementia or Alzheimer's disease), or has evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse for the previous 12 months.
- The patient has a neuromuscular disorder that would engender unacceptable risk of instability, implant fixation failure, or complications in postoperative care.
- The patient has a diagnosed systemic disease that requires the chronic administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and steroidal drugs.
- The patient has osteopenia to a degree that would contraindicate spinal instrumentation (borderline osteoporosis).
- The patient has osteoporosis to a degree that would contraindicate spinal instrumentation.
- The patient is unable or unwilling to attend postoperative follow-up visits.
- The patient has received an investigational drug within the previous six months or an investigational device within the previous 12 months.
- The patient has a spinal condition other than Cervical DDD based upon physical examination and medical history.
- The patient has an infection site distant from the involved levels that may spread to the involved levels hematogenously.
- The patient has insufficient bone stock to fix the component.
- The patient has a known sensitivity to metallic implants.
- The patient is a prisoner.
- The patient has a Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than or equal to 40.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zimmer Biometlead
Study Sites (13)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Institute for Spinal Disorders
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Orthopaedic Specialties
Clearwater, Florida, 33756, United States
Southeastern Clinic Research
Orlando, Florida, 32804, United States
Fort Wayne Orthopedics
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46804, United States
Spine Surgery PSC
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Four East Madison Orthopaedic Associates, PA
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204, United States
Boston Spine Group, LLC
Boston, Massachusetts, 02120, United States
Twin Cities Spine Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55404, United States
Orthocarolina
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
Howell Allen Clinic
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Vanderbilt Orthopedic Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-8774, United States
University of Virginia Health System - Department of Neurosurgery
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
Inova Fairfax Hospital
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Laura Herdrich, Sr. CRA
- Organization
- Zimmer, Inc
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2008
First Posted
September 25, 2008
Study Start
December 1, 2001
Primary Completion
January 1, 2009
Study Completion
June 1, 2009
Last Updated
August 23, 2013
Results First Posted
August 12, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-08