Cervical Movement Control Before and After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
MOVE-ACDF
Early Changes in Dynamic Cervical Movement Control Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Longitudinal Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Degenerative cervical disc disease can cause neck pain, nerve symptoms, dizziness, and problems with balance and head movement control. The neck contains many sensory receptors that provide information about head position and movement to the brain. When cervical discs degenerate or compress nearby structures, this sensory communication may be disrupted. As a result, patients may experience reduced accuracy and coordination of head movements. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a standard surgical procedure used to relieve nerve or spinal cord compression caused by cervical disc disease. The procedure is effective in reducing pain and neurological symptoms. However, it is not well understood whether ACDF also improves the way the neck and nervous system work together to control head movement. The purpose of this study is to evaluate early changes in cervical movement control after ACDF. Patients scheduled for ACDF will be assessed before surgery and again one week after surgery. A group of healthy participants without neck pain will be assessed at the same time interval for comparison. Cervical movement control will be measured using a computer-based head-tracking task. During this task, participants follow a moving target on a screen using controlled head movements. The system records measures of tracking accuracy and timing. The primary research question is whether ACDF results in measurable short-term improvements in objective cervical movement control compared with healthy individuals over the same time period. It is hypothesized that patients undergoing ACDF will demonstrate improvement in specific movement-control measures after surgery. However, broader patterns of movement-control impairment may not fully normalize in the early postoperative period. The results of this study may improve understanding of how cervical spine surgery affects sensorimotor function and may help inform postoperative rehabilitation strategies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 16, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2026
CompletedFebruary 23, 2026
February 1, 2026
24 days
February 13, 2026
February 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Time-on-Target at Medium Difficulty During Dynamic Cervical Head Tracking at 1 Week
Time-on-target is defined as the percentage of total trial time during which the head-controlled cursor remains within a predefined target zone while following an unpredictably moving visual target on a computer screen. Head motion is recorded using a head-mounted inertial measurement unit during a standardized dynamic tracking task. The medium difficulty level involves predefined target speed and trajectory complexity. Values range from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating better tracking accuracy and movement control. Change from baseline to one week postoperatively will be calculated for analysis.
Baseline (within 1 week prior to surgery) and 1 week after surgery
Change From Baseline in Amplitude Accuracy During Dynamic Cervical Head Tracking at 1 Week
Amplitude accuracy is defined as the mean spatial deviation, expressed in millimeters (mm), between a moving visual target and the head-controlled cursor during a standardized dynamic head-tracking task. Head motion is recorded using a head-mounted inertial measurement unit. Values are continuous and expressed in millimeters, with lower values indicating better tracking precision and movement control. Change from baseline to one week postoperatively will be calculated for analysis.
Baseline (within 1 week prior to surgery) and 1 week after surgery
Change From Baseline in Undershoot During Dynamic Cervical Head Tracking at 1 Week
Undershoot is defined as the percentage of total trial time during which the head-controlled cursor remains behind the moving visual target while performing a standardized dynamic head-tracking task. Head motion is recorded using a head-mounted inertial measurement unit. Values range from 0% to 100%, with lower percentages indicating better tracking performance and improved temporal control. Change from baseline to one week postoperatively will be calculated for analysis.
Baseline (within 1 week prior to surgery) and 1 week after surgery
Change From Baseline in Overshoot During Dynamic Cervical Head Tracking at 1 Week
Overshoot is defined as the percentage of total trial time during which the head-controlled cursor moves ahead of the moving visual target during a standardized dynamic head-tracking task. Head motion is recorded using a head-mounted inertial measurement unit. Values range from 0% to 100%, with lower percentages indicating better tracking precision and movement regulation. Change from baseline to one week postoperatively will be calculated for analysis.
Baseline (within 1 week prior to surgery) and 1 week after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Movement-Control Impairment Cluster Classification at 1 Week
Baseline (within 1 week prior to surgery) and 1 week after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants diagnosed with cervical disc pathology and scheduled to undergo anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) as part of standard clinical care. Cervical movement control will be assessed within one week prior to surgery and again one week after surgery using a standardized dynamic head-tracking task. Changes in movement-control parameters will be analyzed to evaluate early postoperative sensorimotor changes.
Non-Surgical Neck Pain Group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants diagnosed with neck pain who are not undergoing surgical treatment will serve as the comparison group. These participants will be assessed at two time points separated by a comparable interval to the surgical group. Cervical movement control will be evaluated using the same standardized dynamic head-tracking task. No surgical intervention will be performed during the study period.
Interventions
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a surgical procedure performed under general anesthesia to treat cervical disc herniation or degenerative disc disease causing nerve root or spinal cord compression. The procedure involves an anterior approach to the cervical spine, removal of the affected intervertebral disc (discectomy), decompression of neural structures, and placement of an interbody graft or cage with or without anterior plate fixation to achieve segmental fusion. The specific surgical technique and implant selection are determined by the treating spine surgeon according to standard clinical practice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Surgical group:
- Age 18 to 65 years
- Clinical diagnosis of cervical disc pathology at one segment level (e.g., cervical disc herniation or degenerative disc disease)
- Scheduled to undergo anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) as part of standard clinical care
- Ability to understand study procedures and provide written informed consent
- Non-Surgical neck pain group:
- Age 18 to 65 years
- Clinical diagnosis of neck pain associated with cervical disc pathology
- Not undergoing surgical treatment during the study period
- Ability to understand study procedures and provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Prior cervical spine surgery
- Diagnosed neurological disorders unrelated to cervical disc pathology (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, stroke)
- Known vestibular disorders affecting balance
- Severe uncorrected visual impairment
- Acute musculoskeletal injury of the neck or upper limb unrelated to the primary cervical condition
- Inability to perform the head-tracking task
- Cognitive impairment preventing informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Ljubljanalead
- University Medical Centre Ljubljanacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana
Ljubljana, 3000, Slovenia
Related Publications (16)
Zheng, H.-L., et al. (2022). ACDF to treat cervical instability with vertigo and dizziness. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, 1047504.
BACKGROUNDYang, L., et al. (2017). Mechanoreceptors in diseased cervical intervertebral disc and vertigo. Spine, 42(8), 540-546.
BACKGROUNDWrisley, D. M., et al. (2000). Cervicogenic dizziness: A review of diagnosis and treatment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 30(12), 755-766.*
BACKGROUNDTreleaven, J. (2008). Sensorimotor disturbances in neck disorders-Part 2. Manual Therapy, 13(3), 266-275.
BACKGROUNDTakayama, H., et al. (2005). Proprioceptive recovery of patients with cervical myelopathy after surgical decompression. Spine, 30(9), 1039-1044.
BACKGROUNDPeng, B. (2018). Cervical vertigo: Historical reviews and advances. World Neurosurgery, 109, 347-350.
BACKGROUNDMendel, T., Wink, C. S., & Zimny, M. L. (1992). Neural elements in human cervical intervertebral discs. Spine, 17(2), 132-135.
BACKGROUNDMajcen Rosker, Z., Vodicar, M., & Kristjansson, E. (2022). Altered oculomotor control during smooth pursuit neck torsion test. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(7).*
BACKGROUNDMajcen Rosker, Z., & Rosker, J. (2024). Cervicocephalic kinaesthesia reveals novel subgroups of motor control impairments in patients with neck pain. Scientific Reports, 14, 8383.
BACKGROUNDMajcen Rosker, Z., Kristjansson, E., & Vodicar, M. (2023). Detection of cervical-driven sensorimotor dysfunction in concussion patients. Gait & Posture, 101, 21-27.
BACKGROUNDMagnusson, M., & Malmström, E.-M. (2016). The conundrum of cervicogenic dizziness. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 137, 365-369.
BACKGROUNDLiu, T.-H., Liu, Y.-Q., & Peng, B.-G. (2021). Cervical intervertebral disc degeneration and dizziness. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 9(9), 2146-2152.*
BACKGROUNDKristjansson, E., & Treleaven, J. (2009). Sensorimotor function and dizziness in neck pain: Implications for assessment and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 39(5).
BACKGROUNDCloward, R. B. (1958). The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. Journal of Neurosurgery, 15(6). PMID: 13585189
BACKGROUNDBoyd-Clark, L. C., Briggs, C. A., & Galea, M. P. (2002). Muscle spindle distribution, morphology, and density in longus colli and multifidus muscles of the cervical spine. Spine, 27(7), 694-701. PMID: 11923660
BACKGROUNDBogduk, N., & Govind, J. (2009). Cervicogenic headache: An assessment of the evidence on clinical diagnosis, invasive tests, and treatment. The Lancet Neurology, 8(10), 959-968.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ziva Majcen Rosker, PhD
Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana
Central Study Contacts
Miha dr. Vodicar, PhD
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Kinesiology, Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2026
First Posted
February 23, 2026
Study Start
February 20, 2026
Primary Completion
March 16, 2026
Study Completion
March 30, 2026
Last Updated
February 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data collected in this study will not be made publicly available. The sample size is relatively small and includes patients treated at a single clinical center, which may increase the risk of indirect participant identification despite de-identification procedures. Additionally, the dataset includes detailed movement-control performance variables and clinical characteristics that could potentially allow re-identification when combined with other publicly available information. Data were collected under informed consent and ethics approval that did not include provisions for public sharing of individual-level data. Aggregate results will be reported in scientific publications to ensure transparency while maintaining participant confidentiality.