Safety and Efficacy Study Comparing ProDisc-C to ACDF Surgery to Treat SCDD
A Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of ProDisc-C to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Surgery in the Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease (SCDD)
1 other identifier
interventional
368
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The objective of this clinical investigation is to compare the safety and effectiveness of ProDisc-C to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery in the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2003
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 8, 2017
CompletedNovember 20, 2017
October 1, 2017
11.6 years
February 10, 2006
November 17, 2016
October 17, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall Success
Sponsor Definition of Overall Success: (1) Subject's NDI score improved by at least 20% over preoperative baseline value (2) Subject's neurologic parameters, i.e. motor, sensory, and reflexes were maintained or improved as compared to preoperative baseline value (3) No removals, revisions, re-operations, or additional fixation were required to modify any implant (4) No adverse events occurred which were related to the treatment, ProDisc-C or its implantation or ACDF surgery or its associated implants or graft material
84 Months
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Neurologic Success
84 months
NDI
84 months
SF-36 Physical Composite Score (PCS)
84 Months
SF-36 Mental Composite Score (MCS)
84 Months
VAS Satisfaction
84 Months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ProDisc-C
EXPERIMENTALProDisc-C total disc replacement device intended to treat single level SCDD in the cervical spine from C3-C7
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORACDF
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) in one vertebral level between C3-C7 defined as: Neck or arm (radicular) pain; and/or a functional/neurological deficit with at least one of the following conditions confirmed by imaging (CT, MRI or X-rays): Herniated nucleus pulposus; Spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes); and/or Loss of disc height.
- Age between 18 and 60 years.
- Unresponsive to non-operative treatment for approximately six weeks or has the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression in the face of conservative treatment.
- NDI score greater than or equal to 15/50 (30%).
- Psychosocially, mentally and physically able to fully comply with the protocol including adhering to follow-up schedule and requirements and filling out forms.
- Signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- More than one vertebral level requiring treatment.
- Marked cervical instability on resting lateral or flexion/extension radiographs: translation greater than 3mm and/or greater than 11 degrees of rotational difference to that of either adjacent level.
- Has a fused level adjacent to the level to be treated.
- Radiographic confirmation of severe facet joint disease or degeneration.
- Known allergy to cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, titanium or polyethylene.
- Clinically comprised vertebral bodies at the affected level(s) due to current or past trauma, e.g. by the radiographic appearance of fracture callus, malunion or nonunion.
- Prior surgery at the level to be treated.
- Severe spondylosis at the level to be treated as characterized by any of the following: Bridging osteophytes; A loss of disc height greater than 50%; or Absence of motion (\<2°).
- Neck or arm pain of unknown etiology.
- Paget's disease, osteomalacia or any other metabolic bone disease (excluding osteoporosis which is addressed above).
- Severe diabetes mellitus requiring daily insulin management.
- Pregnant or interested in becoming pregnant in the next three years.
- Active infection - systemic or local.
- Taking medications or any drug known to potentially interfere with bone/soft tissue healing (e.g., steroids).
- Rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disease.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Mancuso CA, Cammisa FP, Sama AA, Hughes AP, Girardi FP. Development of an expectations survey for patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 20;38(9):718-25. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827bf204.
PMID: 23138404DERIVEDZigler JE, Delamarter R, Murrey D, Spivak J, Janssen M. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 1;38(3):203-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318278eb38.
PMID: 23080427DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Erin Prifogle
- Organization
- DePuy Synthes Spine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2006
First Posted
February 13, 2006
Study Start
August 1, 2003
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 20, 2017
Results First Posted
March 8, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10