The Impact of Osmotic Release Oral Delivery System Methylphenidate (OROS MPH) Upon Family of Children and Adolescents With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
From Immediate-release MPH to OROS MPH: The Impact Upon Family of Children and Adolescents With ADHD
3 other identifiers
interventional
296
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether familial relationships and psychological status of participants or caregivers as well as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms of participants can be improved by switching from Immediate-release Methylphenidate (IR-MPH) to Osmotic Release Oral Delivery System Methylphenidate (OROS-MPH).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Mar 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 19, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 8, 2014
CompletedApril 8, 2014
March 1, 2014
3 months
September 19, 2008
September 5, 2013
March 10, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Mean Change From Baseline in Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-Fourth Edition (SNAP-IV) Rating Scale (Parents) Score at Week 2
Parents were asked to assess their children on a 26-item Chinese SNAP-IV questionnaire consisting of inattention (items 1-9; subscore range 0-27), hyperactivity (items 10-18; subscore range 0-27) and oppositional (19-26, subscore range 0-24) subscales used to assess the qualitative judgments in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Each item was based on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The overall score ranged from 0 to 78. The total score for Inattention and hyperactivity ranged from 0 to 27 and for oppositional ranged from 0 to 21. Mean Change was calculated as mean SNAP-IV score at Week 2 minus mean SNAP-IV score at Baseline.
Baseline and Week 2
Mean Change From Baseline in Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-Fourth Edition (SNAP-IV) Rating Scale (Parents) Score at Week 4
Parents were asked to assess their children on a 26-item Chinese SNAP-IV questionnaire consisting of inattention (items 1-9; subscore range 0-27), hyperactivity (items 10-18; subscore range 0-27) and oppositional (19-26, subscore range 0-24) subscales used to assess the qualitative judgments in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Each item was based on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The overall score ranged from 0 to 78. The total score for Inattention and hyperactivity ranged from 0 to 27 and for oppositional ranged from 0 to 21. Mean Change was calculated as mean SNAP-IV score at Week 4 minus mean SNAP-IV score at Baseline.
Baseline and Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-Fourth Edition (SNAP-IV) Rating Scale (Parents) Score at Week 8
Parents were asked to assess their children on a 26-item Chinese SNAP-IV questionnaire consisting of inattention (items 1-9; subscore range 0-27), hyperactivity (items 10-18; subscore range 0-27) and oppositional (19-26, subscore range 0-24) subscales used to assess the qualitative judgments in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Each item was based on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The overall score ranged from 0 to 78. The total score for Inattention and hyperactivity ranged from 0 to 27 and for oppositional ranged from 0 to 21. Mean Change was calculated as mean SNAP-IV score at Week 8 minus mean SNAP-IV score at Baseline.
Baseline and Week 8
Mean Change From Baseline in Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ) at Week 4
The CHQ is a self administered screening instrument used to assess psychiatric morbidity in the Chinese community. It was derived from the General Health Questionnaire, and has been validated with satisfactory construct validity and applied in the survey of psychiatric morbidity in the community and in hospital settings. Four factors are included in the structure: somatic symptoms; anxiety and worrying; sleep problems; and depression and poor family relationships. It contains 12 items, with a maximum score of 12. CHQ scores indicated the severity of participants' psychological problems (0-2=normal; 3-4=minor; 5-6=moderate; and 7-12=severe psychological problems). Mean Change was calculated as mean CHQ score at Week 4 minus mean CHQ score at Baseline.
Baseline and Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ) at Week 8
The CHQ is a self administered screening instrument used to assess psychiatric morbidity in the Chinese community. It was derived from the General Health Questionnaire, and has been validated with satisfactory construct validity and applied in the survey of psychiatric morbidity in the community and in hospital settings. Four factors are included in the structure: somatic symptoms; anxiety and worrying; sleep problems; and depression and poor family relationships. It contains 12 items, with a maximum score of 12. CHQ scores indicated the severity of participants' psychological problems (0-2=normal; 3-4=minor; 5-6=moderate; and 7-12=severe psychological problems). Mean Change was calculated as mean CHQ score at Week 8 minus mean CHQ score at Baseline.
Baseline and Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Chinese Version of the Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (Family APGAR-C) Score
Baseline, Week 4 and 8
Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-Fourth Edition (SNAP-IV) Rating Scale (Teachers) Score
Baseline, Week 2, 4 and 8
Social Adjustment Scale Score for Children and Adolescents (SAICA)
Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score
Baseline, Week 2, 4 and 8
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score
Baseline, Week 2, 4 and 8
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Global Assessment of Satisfaction by Participant
Baseline, Week 2, 4 and 8
Study Arms (1)
OROS methylphenidate
EXPERIMENTALParticipants willl receive Osmotic Release Oral Delivery System (OROS) methylphenidate (MPH) 18 milligram (mg), 36 mg or 54 mg once daily for 8 weeks. Dose will be adjusted for each participant based on clinical responses and/or side effects.
Interventions
Participants will receive Osmotic Release Oral Delivery System (OROS) methylphenidate (MPH) 18 milligram (mg), 36 mg or 54 mg once daily for 8 weeks. Dose will be adjusted for each participant based on clinical responses and/or side effects.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants who are diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)
- Participants who have been treated with Immediate-release methyphenidate (IR-MPH) for at least 4 weeks before enrollment, but previous treatment is considered unsatisfactory due to 1 or more of the following reasons: lack of effectiveness, lack of tolerability or safety, lack of compliance, and/or other reasons
- Participants who are able to comply with the study visit schedule and whose parents/caregiver and community school teacher are willing and able to complete the protocol-specified assessments
- Participants who are still at school
- Participants who are treated with greater than equal to 10 milligram (mg) IR-MPH daily before enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who cannot understand or follow the instructions given in the study
- Participants with serious or unstable medical illness
- Participants who have clinically significant gastrointestinal problems, including narrowing of the gastrointestinal tract
- Participants who have glaucoma (increased pressure inside the eye that causes visual problems), an ongoing seizure disorders, or a psychotic disorder
- Participants who are hypersensitive to methylphenidate
- Participants who have any co-existing medical condition or are taking a concomitant medication that is likely to interfere with safe administration of methylphenidate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Affairs Director
- Organization
- Janssen Pharmaceutical, Taiwan
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johnson & Johnson Taiwan, Ltd. Clinical Trial
Johnson & Johnson Taiwan Ltd
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2008
First Posted
September 23, 2008
Study Start
March 1, 2008
Primary Completion
June 1, 2008
Study Completion
June 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 8, 2014
Results First Posted
April 8, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03