NCT00937040

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the ADHD symptom response of adults with ADHD treated with OROS MPH to those treated with placebo.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
357

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 29, 2009

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2009

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 10, 2009

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2010

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 5, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

July 30, 2013

Status Verified

July 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

June 29, 2009

Results QC Date

February 28, 2011

Last Update Submit

July 23, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Osmotic Release Oral System (OROS®) Extended Release Methylphenidate HClCONCERTA® (OROS MPH)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) Over Time Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Fourth Edition for Diagnosis

    The Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) assesses 18 core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adult subjects based on the investigator's rating for each of the symptoms using a four point scale (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe). If a single item is missing the score is imputed and if more than one item is missing, the total score is treated as missing. The AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).

    Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Reaction Time Domain of the Stroop Test (Cognitive and Executive Function)

    Baseline, 4 hour timepoint for extended days or last non-missing value for non-extended days on day 42 or early discontinuation (endpoint)

  • Vigilance Domain (Complex Attention) of the Stroop Test/Shifting Attention Test (SAT)/Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (Cognitive and Executive Function)

    Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

  • Cognitive Flexibility Domain of the Stroop/SAT Tests (Cognitive and Executive Function)

    Baseline, 4 hour timepoint for extended days or last non-missing value for non-extended days on day 42 or early discontinuation (endpoint)

  • Processing Speed Domain of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDTM) (Cognitive and Executive Function)

    Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

  • Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)

    Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

001

EXPERIMENTAL

OROS MPH Optimal Patient Dose (18 mg-72 mg) once daily by mouth for 6 weeks

Drug: OROS MPHDrug: OROS MPH Tablets

002

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo Optimal Patient Dose (placebo to match 18 mg - 72 mg) once daily by mouth for 6 weeks

Drug: PlaceboDrug: Placebo Tablets

Interventions

Optimal Patient Dose (18 mg-72 mg) once daily for 6 weeks

001

Optimal Patient Dose (placebo to match 18 mg - 72 mg) once daily for 6 weeks

002

Optimal Patient Dose (18 mg-72 mg) once daily by mouth for 6 weeks

001

Optimal Patient Dose (placebo to match 18 mg - 72 mg) once daily by mouth for 6 weeks

002

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults
  • ADHD diagnosis (any type: Combined, Predominantly Inattentive, or Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive)
  • Patients with an Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) score greater than 24 at screening/baseline
  • Ability to read and understand English

You may not qualify if:

  • Any significant history of cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular disease detectable via ECG
  • History of diagnosis of substance or alcohol dependence or admission/hospitalization for rehabilitation for dependence
  • Current neurologic or psychiatric diagnosis that would make patient inappropriate for participation
  • Anxiety assessments of moderate or severe
  • Depression assessments of moderate or severe
  • History or current suicidal thoughts or attempts
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to OROS MPH

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Goodman DW, Starr HL, Ma YW, Rostain AL, Ascher S, Armstrong RB. Randomized, 6-Week, Placebo-Controlled Study of Treatment for Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Individualized Dosing of Osmotic-Release Oral System (OROS) Methylphenidate With a Goal of Symptom Remission. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;78(1):105-114. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10348.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
VP Medical Affairs, CNS
Organization
Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

Study Officials

  • Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Clinical Trial

    Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2009

First Posted

July 10, 2009

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion

February 1, 2010

Study Completion

February 1, 2010

Last Updated

July 30, 2013

Results First Posted

August 5, 2011

Record last verified: 2013-07