Comparing the Effectiveness of New Versus Older Treatments for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (The NOTA Study)
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate Transdermal System (Daytrana), Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (Vyvanse), OROS MPH (Concerta), and Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended Release (Adderall XR) in Children and Adolescents With ADHD
3 other identifiers
interventional
228
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will determine whether two new psychostimulant medications are more effective, tolerable, and acceptable than two older medications for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Apr 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 30, 2013
CompletedSeptember 30, 2013
July 1, 2013
8 months
April 27, 2009
January 22, 2013
July 30, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Dichotomized Clinical Global Impression-Effectiveness (CGI-E) Scale
The CGI-E is the value at which the participant's Therapeutic Benefit and Adverse Impact to the study drug intersect. This number is determined by combining each participant's scores for the degree of Therapeutic Benefit versus the degree to which problems with Tolerability and/or Acceptability adversely impact the subject. Participants are then determined to be Responders or Non-responders to the study medication. For example, a subject who is very much improved (CGI-I=1) or much improved (CGI-I=2) therapeutically and whose adverse impact rating is none (score 1,5) or mild (score 2,6) will be categorized as a Responder. All others whose adverse impact rating is moderate (score 3,7,11,15)or outweighs therapeutic effect (score 4,8,12,16) will be categorized as Non-responders to study medication. The CGI scores are totaled for each participant and a mean score is calculated. A median total score was calculated for each treatment group.
Measured at each participant's last visit, which can occur at or before Week 6
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale
Measured at each participant's last visit, which can occur at or before Week 6
Clinical Global Improvements-Acceptability (CGI-A) Scale
Measured at each participant's last visit, which can occur at or before Week 6
Study Arms (4)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive methylphenidate transdermal system.
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive lisdexamfetamine dimesylate.
3
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS MPH).
4
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive mixed amphetamine salts extended release.
Interventions
Not specified in protocol; determined by local standard of care.
Not specified in protocol; determined by local standard of care.
Not specified in protocol; determined by local standard of care.
Not specified in protocol; determined by local standard of care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Meets DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD combined, hyperactive/impulsive, or inattentive subtype
- Outpatient at study entry
- Speaks English
- Willing to be randomly assigned to one of the study treatment options as outlined in the protocol
- No known significant history of cardiovascular disorders, including pre-existing congenital heart disease, structural heart disease, known clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, or other clinically significant cardiac disorder
- Willing to initiate study medication for ADHD within 7 days of the study baseline visit
- May be receiving stable treatment with other drug for a comorbid disorder, defined as no changes in dose or form of drug treatment for at least 2 weeks prior to the study enrollment visit
- May be receiving psychosocial interventions for ADHD or a comorbid disorder, defined as no changes in form of psychosocial treatment for at least 4 weeks prior to the study enrollment visit
You may not qualify if:
- Hypersensitivity to study medication
- Inpatient status at study entry
- Currently taking another medication for ADHD, including another psychostimulant, atomoxetine, or bupropion
- Receiving treatment with a tricyclic antidepressant at study enrollment, with the exception of low-dose imipramine for enuresis or amitriptyline for chronic pain
- Received treatment with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within the past 30 days
- Psychostimulant drug dependence, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia
- Presence of psychosis
- Severe mental retardation
- Autism or Asperger's syndrome
- Active suicidal ideation
- Unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol
- Demonstrates a lack of benefit from, an intolerance to, or contraindication to psychostimulant medicine
- Presence of other clinically significant medical conditions, including hyperthyroidism, epilepsy or other seizure disorder, any condition for which an increase in blood pressure or heart rate would be problematic, glaucoma or other significant eye disease for which a psychostimulant would be problematic, or pre-existing gastrointestinal obstruction with gastrointestinal narrowing
- Pregnant or positive result of pregnancy test
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Trials Network (CAPTN)
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- John S. March, MD, MPH
- Organization
- Duke Clinical Research Institute - Duke University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John S. March, MD, MPH
Duke University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2009
First Posted
April 29, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
September 30, 2013
Results First Posted
September 30, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07