Randomized Trial of the Effectiveness of Topical "ABH Gel" vs. Placebo in Cancer Patients With Nausea
A Randomized Trial of the Effectiveness of Topical "ABH Gel" (Ativan®, Lorazepam; Benadryl®, Diphenhydramine; and Haldol®, Haloperidol Gel) Versus Placebo in Patients With Nausea
2 other identifiers
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial studies ABH (lorazepam, diphenhydramine hydrochloride, and haloperidol) gel in patients with nausea. ABH gel, when absorbed into the skin, may be an effective treatment for nausea and vomiting. The general purpose of this research study is to improve the treatment of nausea and vomiting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 16, 2015
CompletedOctober 16, 2015
October 1, 2015
1.2 years
March 13, 2012
March 3, 2015
October 15, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Change in Numeric Rating Scale in Self-reported Nausea From Baseline Minus 60 Minutes of Treatment.
The outcome measure for change was calculated from value at baseline minus value at 60 minutes. Subjects were asked to rate their nausea on a 0 (no nausea) to 10 (worst possible nausea) scale. Subjects who were eligible were randomly assigned to two sequences: one sequence used ABH gel first and then placebo; and the other sequence used placebo first and then ABH gel. We assumed that there was no carry-over effect from the first treatment to the second. A paired t-test was used to compare if ABH gel is not better than the placebo gel. A repeated measure analysis was used to compare the two treatment sequences. This endpoint was chosen as the drug gel because it is typically used as a "prn" (as needed) gel in actual practice, when relief is needed in short order.
60 minutes after application
Study Arms (2)
Placebo then ABH
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects randomized to two sequences of treatments: either placebo-ABH or ABH-placebo. All participants will receive both drug A and drug B. After applying gel, Drug A or B, on wrists for 2 minutes, time 0. From baseline to 60 minutes of treatment two options will occur. At 60 minutes, if patients have at least 1 point reduction in their nausea score, they must wait 4 hours before switching to opposite drug. After administration of drug, the study procedures will be repeated. Or, at 60 minutes, if no change or increase in nausea score has been recorded, alternative treatment will be given. If the second treatment is ineffective at one hour (total time 2 hours) then alternative usual medications will be given. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 8 hours.
ABH then placebo
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects randomized to two sequences of treatments: either placebo-ABH or ABH-placebo. All participants will receive both drug A and drug B. After applying gel, Drug A or B, on wrists for 2 minutes, time 0. From baseline to 60 minutes of treatment two options will occur. At 60 minutes, if patients have at least 1 point reduction in their nausea score, they must wait 4 hours before switching to opposite drug. After administration of drug, the study procedures will be repeated. Or, at 60 minutes, if no change or increase in nausea score has been recorded, alternative treatment will be given. If the second treatment is ineffective at one hour (total time 2 hours) then alternative usual medications will be given. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 8 hours.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English speaking
- No allergies to the drugs
- Able to complete the forms
- If a woman of childbearing age, agree to use contraception; women will be offered a pregnancy test before doing the trial if they request one, as stated in the Informed Consent Form
- Patients must have a self reported nausea score of at least 4 on a numeric rating scale of 0-10 (zero being no nausea and ten being the worst possible nausea); patients are not required to have vomiting
- Patients must have had or have cancer, or have had a consultation with the palliative care team
- They must not have had any changes to their nausea program within the past 12 hours, if on anti-emetics
- Patients must not have received chemotherapy within 5 days, unless it is a stable oral chemotherapy drug such as capecitabine (Xeloda), erlotinib (Tarceva), or similar
You may not qualify if:
- History of substance abuse, psychiatric disorder, acquired brain injury, the possibility of pregnancy (not using birth control, and of child bearing age)
- Use of any medication that would contraindicate benzodiazepine administration
- Pregnant or nursing
- Children
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Virginia Commonwealth Universitylead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Devon S. Flecher, MD
- Organization
- Virginia Commonwealth University/ Hospice & Pallative Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Devon Fletcher
Virginia Commonwealth University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2012
First Posted
March 19, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 16, 2015
Results First Posted
October 16, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10