NCT00705146

Brief Summary

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a common condition that is seen regularly in outpatient occupational therapy and physiotherapy departments. Prevalence rates of symptomatic thumb OA have been found to be as high as 25%. The conservative treatment of choice consists of splinting. There are many different types of thumb splints available, but no specific guidelines as to which is preferred. There is limited evidence to support the benefits of splinting. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two different thumb splints: the Comfort Cool, a prefabricated neoprene splint and a custom made neoprene and thermoplastic thumb splint. These are two of the most commonly prescribed splints in local occupational therapy departments.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2008

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2008

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 23, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 25, 2008

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2009

Completed
5.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 11, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

December 11, 2014

Status Verified

December 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

June 23, 2008

Results QC Date

May 1, 2012

Last Update Submit

December 9, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, carpometacarpal jointThumb splintsAUSCAN-HI 3.1Grip and pinch strength

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Hand Function

    Hand Function was measured with the Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index 3.1 (AUSCAN). The AUSCAN is a self-report tool with 15 questions in 3 subscales: pain, function, joint stiffness, and uses an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale. The AUSCAN function subscale has 9 items regarding level of difficulty in performing daily tasks such as opening a jar, turning a doorknob, wringing out a washcloth. Possible scores range from 0 to 90. Mean change scores are reported (baseline compared to 4 weeks splint use). Higher scores indicate worse function.

    4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain

    4 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Comfort Cool Splint

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Comfort Cool(TM) splint, a prefabricated neoprene splint, fit according to the participant's size (S, M, M+, L). Participants instructed to wear the splint when symptomatic, during manual tasks, and at night if desired. Used for 4 weeks.

Device: Comfort Cool thumb splint by North Coast Medical

Hybrid Custom-made splint

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Hybrid splint was based on Pat McKee's custom-made splint design, fabricated from neoprene and 1.6 mm Rolyan Aquaplast Watercolors (Bollingbrook, IL). Participants were instructed to wear the splint when symptomatic, during manual tasks, and at night if desired. Splint was worn for 4 weeks.

Device: Custom made thermoplastic & neoprene splint

Interventions

Comfort Cool(TM) splint, a prefabricated neoprene splint, fit according to the participant's size (S, M, M+, L). Participants instructed to wear the splint when symptomatic, during manual tasks, and at night if desired. Used for 4 weeks. Treating therapists did not provide exercises or joint protection education until the final outcome measurement session at 9 weeks.

Comfort Cool Splint

The Hybrid splint was based on Pat McKee's custom-made splint design, fabricated from neoprene and 1.6 mm Rolyan Aquaplast Watercolors (Bollingbrook, IL). Participants were instructed to wear the splint when symptomatic, during manual tasks, and at night if desired. Splint was worn for 4 weeks. Treating therapists did not provide exercises or joint protection education until the final outcome measurement session at 9 weeks.

Hybrid Custom-made splint

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • physician diagnosis of CMC OA
  • years or older
  • able to read and write in English

You may not qualify if:

  • previous thumb surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Campbell River Hospital

Campbell River, British Columbia, V9W 3V1, Canada

Location

Nanaimo Regional General Hospital

Nanaimo, British Columbia, V9S 2B7, Canada

Location

Victoria Island Hand Clinic

Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 4R2, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Sillem H, Backman CL, Miller WC, Li LC. Comparison of two carpometacarpal stabilizing splints for individuals with thumb osteoarthritis. J Hand Ther. 2011 Jul-Sep;24(3):216-25; quiz 126; discussion 227-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

The main limitation of this cross-over trial was that the therapists who collected the data were not blinded to the splinting intervention, as they were required to fabricate and fit each splint.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Helia Sillem MScOT
Organization
VIHA

Study Officials

  • Catherine Backman, Ph.D

    University of British Columbia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Peter Kirk, Ph.D

    University of British Columbia

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2008

First Posted

June 25, 2008

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion

June 1, 2009

Study Completion

June 1, 2009

Last Updated

December 11, 2014

Results First Posted

December 11, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-12

Locations