CMC (Carpometacarpal) OA (Osteoarthritis) Thumb Splint Study
Comparison of Two Carpometacarpal Stabilizing Splints for People With Thumb Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a common condition that is seen regularly in outpatient occupational therapy and physiotherapy departments. Prevalence rates of symptomatic thumb OA have been found to be as high as 25%. The conservative treatment of choice consists of splinting. There are many different types of thumb splints available, but no specific guidelines as to which is preferred. There is limited evidence to support the benefits of splinting. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two different thumb splints: the Comfort Cool, a prefabricated neoprene splint and a custom made neoprene and thermoplastic thumb splint. These are two of the most commonly prescribed splints in local occupational therapy departments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Apr 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 11, 2014
CompletedDecember 11, 2014
December 1, 2014
1.2 years
June 23, 2008
May 1, 2012
December 9, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hand Function
Hand Function was measured with the Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index 3.1 (AUSCAN). The AUSCAN is a self-report tool with 15 questions in 3 subscales: pain, function, joint stiffness, and uses an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale. The AUSCAN function subscale has 9 items regarding level of difficulty in performing daily tasks such as opening a jar, turning a doorknob, wringing out a washcloth. Possible scores range from 0 to 90. Mean change scores are reported (baseline compared to 4 weeks splint use). Higher scores indicate worse function.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Comfort Cool Splint
ACTIVE COMPARATORComfort Cool(TM) splint, a prefabricated neoprene splint, fit according to the participant's size (S, M, M+, L). Participants instructed to wear the splint when symptomatic, during manual tasks, and at night if desired. Used for 4 weeks.
Hybrid Custom-made splint
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Hybrid splint was based on Pat McKee's custom-made splint design, fabricated from neoprene and 1.6 mm Rolyan Aquaplast Watercolors (Bollingbrook, IL). Participants were instructed to wear the splint when symptomatic, during manual tasks, and at night if desired. Splint was worn for 4 weeks.
Interventions
Comfort Cool(TM) splint, a prefabricated neoprene splint, fit according to the participant's size (S, M, M+, L). Participants instructed to wear the splint when symptomatic, during manual tasks, and at night if desired. Used for 4 weeks. Treating therapists did not provide exercises or joint protection education until the final outcome measurement session at 9 weeks.
The Hybrid splint was based on Pat McKee's custom-made splint design, fabricated from neoprene and 1.6 mm Rolyan Aquaplast Watercolors (Bollingbrook, IL). Participants were instructed to wear the splint when symptomatic, during manual tasks, and at night if desired. Splint was worn for 4 weeks. Treating therapists did not provide exercises or joint protection education until the final outcome measurement session at 9 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- physician diagnosis of CMC OA
- years or older
- able to read and write in English
You may not qualify if:
- previous thumb surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of British Columbialead
- Vancouver Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Campbell River Hospital
Campbell River, British Columbia, V9W 3V1, Canada
Nanaimo Regional General Hospital
Nanaimo, British Columbia, V9S 2B7, Canada
Victoria Island Hand Clinic
Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 4R2, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Sillem H, Backman CL, Miller WC, Li LC. Comparison of two carpometacarpal stabilizing splints for individuals with thumb osteoarthritis. J Hand Ther. 2011 Jul-Sep;24(3):216-25; quiz 126; discussion 227-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
PMID: 21420278RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The main limitation of this cross-over trial was that the therapists who collected the data were not blinded to the splinting intervention, as they were required to fabricate and fit each splint.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Helia Sillem MScOT
- Organization
- VIHA
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Catherine Backman, Ph.D
University of British Columbia
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Peter Kirk, Ph.D
University of British Columbia
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2008
First Posted
June 25, 2008
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
June 1, 2009
Study Completion
June 1, 2009
Last Updated
December 11, 2014
Results First Posted
December 11, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12