Smoking Interventions in General Medical Practices
PRO GP
Different Types of Proactive Smoking Interventions for General Medical Practices: An Implementation Study
1 other identifier
interventional
3,215
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Primary care physicians can play an important role in reducing tobacco smoking in the population. The general practice is a suitable setting for implementing proactive smoking interventions, because a large proportion of the population can be regularly reached in a favorable psychological state. Further, a trustful interpersonal relationship between the practitioners and their patients is supposed to increase the susceptibility to preventive measures. However, currently general practitioners are not capitalizing this advantage although evidence based treatments are available, which are effective and cost-effective. Outreach programs combining educational and practice-based measures have been found to be effective in engaging practitioners in screening and in giving advice. Computer expert-system and brief counseling interventions, which are based on the Transtheo-retical Model of behavior change (TTM), are promising approaches for the entire population of practitioners and smoking patients. For large scale implementation, data are needed about the degree of integration in every day routine clinical practice that could be achieved by implementing such interventions. Objectives: Evaluating different strategies for the implementation of proactive smoking interventions in general practices. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 150 randomly selected general practices of a defined German region will be included. The procedure comprises the implementation of 1) an on-site computer expert-system intervention, 2) a counseling intervention provided by the practitioner, or 3) the computer expert-system plus the counseling intervention. During an implementation phase of one month, two on site training sessions and support by phone will be provided. Routine use of the interventions will be monitored for the following 6 months. Main outcome measures are the number and rate of identified and treated smokers. A follow-up assessment will be realized 12 months after practice attendance to determine the smoking status of the treated smokers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Oct 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 19, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2009
CompletedMay 19, 2008
May 1, 2008
3.8 years
May 15, 2008
May 16, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of treated Patients by practice within study period
7 months
Point prevalence smoking abstinence of treated patients
24 hours, 7 days, 4 weeks, 6 months preceeding the 12 months follow-up assessment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Participation rate of practices
within recruitment phase
Quit and cut down attempts of patients
12 months
number of cigarettes smoked per day
4 weeks preceeding follow-up
Stages of change progress
at 12 month follow-up compared to baseline
Study Arms (3)
3
EXPERIMENTALA practitioner delivered counselling and an expert system intervention is implemented in practices allocated to this arm
1
EXPERIMENTALA practitioner delivered counselling intervention was implemented in practices allocated to this arm
2
EXPERIMENTALA computer expert system intervention was implemented in practices allocated to this arm
Interventions
A personal counselling by the residing practitioner of up to 10 minutes. A follow-up counselling is included for the next regular patient consultation
Counselling letter of three to four pages will be generated by an expert-system base on the assessment of the patient. A second and third letter will be generated at follow-up consultations.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Practices with regular office hours
- Practices predominantly providing primary medical care for adults
- Patients with age 18 and older
- Patients with sufficient German language and cognitive capabilities to complete assessment
- Patients smoking within the preceding six month
You may not qualify if:
- Practices planing closure within the next 12 months
- Practices opening less than 12 months ago
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Medicine Greifswaldlead
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Researchcollaborator
- German Research Foundationcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian Meyer, Dr.
University of Greifswald
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ulrich John, Prof. Dr.
University of Greifswald
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2008
First Posted
May 19, 2008
Study Start
October 1, 2004
Primary Completion
August 1, 2008
Study Completion
June 1, 2009
Last Updated
May 19, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-05