Health Effects of SLT, Cigarette Smoking, and New Tobacco Products
ANTS3
Comparing the Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco, Cigarette Smoking, and New Tobacco Products Advertised as Safer Alternatives Part of Tobacco Exposure Reduction
2 other identifiers
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of smokeless tobacco (ST) as a substitute for cigarette smoking has been suggested since it is considered by some to be a less harmful tobacco product (Russell, Jarvis and Feyerabend, 1980; Russell et al, 1981; Rodu, 1994). ST does not have the volatile constituents and carbon monoxide (CO) that are found in cigarette smoke. Since ST is not smoked there would be less risk of cardiovascular and lung disease. In addition the harm associated with second hand smoke would be eliminated. Although the health risks are reduced in ST users, they still exist due to the presence of nitrosamines found in ST. A better approach would be to use nicotine replacement that did not contain carcinogens, however the cost of such NRT could be prohibitive especially in third world countries where the rate of smoking is continuing to rise and the per capita income is much lower than in the United States. Purpose: The goal of this study is to evaluate the health effects of Camel Snus, the new oral tobacco product produced by RJ Reynolds and Taboka, produced by Phillip Morris. These products are pasteurized rather than fermented and contain less moisture to eliminate spitting. They are marketed as an alternative to cigarette smoking.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jan 2007
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 3, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 14, 2014
CompletedNovember 1, 2019
October 1, 2019
2.1 years
May 3, 2007
October 29, 2013
October 30, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Toxicant Exposure by Products
Levels of carcinogen biomarkers (NNAL) reported as difference between baseline and week 4 scores.
Baseline, 4 weeks
Product Use at Week 4 of Intervention
Self-reported daily use of the assigned study product. Range of scores is from 0 to about 20. Higher scores do not represent either a better or a worse outcome. Higher number of product used per day may indicate higher abuse liability of the product but may lead to a greater suppression in usual brand cigarette smoking. Lower number of product use per day may indicate lower abuse liability but may lead to lower suppression of usual brand smoking.
4 weeks
Abstinence From Tobacco at End of Treatment, 1 Week and 11 Weeks Post-intervention.
This study was not powered to detect differences in smoking cessation rates between groups; however, smoking status was collected at each visit to obtain preliminary data. Point prevalence (no smoking during the previous 7 days) cigarette abstinence rates were calculated at the end of treatment and at each of the 2 follow-up visits (week 1 and 11 post-intervention). Continuous abstinence rates were calculated for the 4 week period between the week 1 and week 4 visits. Abstinence at all visits was assessed by self-report (i.e., no cigarettes smoked) and confirmed by an exhaled CO of less than 8 ppm. At the follow-up visits, abstinence was also confirmed by both exhaled CO concentrations and urinary cotinine concentration (\<35 ng/mL).
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Product Effect on Craving and Nicotine Withdrawal Symptoms at 1 Week.
Baseline and 1 week
Study Arms (3)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORNicotine gum or nicotine lozenge; Dosage: 2 or 4 mg; Frequency: Daily; Duration: 5 weeks of use of which 1 week is tapering.
2
EXPERIMENTALTaboka - oral tobacco product Dosage: 0.84 to 1.26 mg free nicotine per g dry weight; Frequency: Daily; Duration: 5 weeks of use of which 1 week is tapering.
3
EXPERIMENTALCamel Snus - oral tobacco product Dosage: 6.09 to 9.16 mg dry weight; Frequency: Daily; Duration: 5 weeks of use of which 1 week is tapering.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects between 18-70 years of age
- Smoking at least 10 cigarettes/day for at least one year
- Good physical and mental health as evidenced by a medical history with no unstable medical conditions.
You may not qualify if:
- Uncontrolled chronic disease or condition that requires medical attention during the course of the study
- Contraindications for nicotine replacement products: active ulcers, recent heart attack, heart disease or irregular heart beat, uncontrolled high blood pressure, or medication use that might affect tobacco use
- Current unstable psychiatric diagnoses or persons who currently are adjusting medication dose. (within the last 3 months)
- Subjects with current or recent (within 6 months) alcohol or drug abuse problem
- Other regular tobacco use such as regular cigar or pipe smoking
- Currently using other nicotine replacement products
- Chronic use of any drug that could interact with the study drugs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Minnesotalead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Tobacco Use Research Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55414, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kotlyar M, Hertsgaard LA, Lindgren BR, Jensen JA, Carmella SG, Stepanov I, Murphy SE, Hecht SS, Hatsukami DK. Effect of oral snus and medicinal nicotine in smokers on toxicant exposure and withdrawal symptoms: a feasibility study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Jan;20(1):91-100. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0349. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
PMID: 21068204BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Smokeless tobacco products commercially available have been introduced, withdrawn, or changed at a relatively rapid rate resulting in products that are no longer available and changes that occurred during the time period that the study occurred.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dorothy Hatsukami, Ph.D.
- Organization
- University of Minnesota
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dorothy Hatsukami, PHD
University of Minnesota
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 3, 2007
First Posted
May 4, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion
February 1, 2009
Study Completion
February 1, 2009
Last Updated
November 1, 2019
Results First Posted
April 14, 2014
Record last verified: 2019-10