Neo-adjuvant Therapy and the Effect on Synchronous Metastatic Growth
Accelerated Growth of Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases: Effects of Neo-adjuvant Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Study Hypothesis
- As well as in animal models as in patients with colorectal cancer resection of the primary tumor resulted in increase in vascular density, metabolism and secondary tumor growth of the distant metastases. These data strongly suggest an inhibitory effect of the primary tumor on the outgrowth of its metastases. In this study we investigate whether pre-operative treatment with the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy before resection of the primary colorectal tumor shifts the balance between angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors in favor of the anti-angiogenic factors and results in reduced growth of the liver metastases. Eligibility
- Histological proven colorectal cancer without signs of bowel obstruction or bleeding
- Synchronous liver metastases
- WHO performance status 0-1 Treatment
- Arm A: immediate surgery of the primary colorectal tumor, no neoadjuvant therapy
- Arm B: neoadjuvant treatment with bevacizumab during 7 weeks prior to surgery of the colorectal primary
- Arm C: neoadjuvant treatment with CAPOX during 7 weeks prior to surgery of the colorectal primary
- Arm D: neoadjuvant treatment with bevacizumab and CAPOX during 7 weeks prior to surgery of the colorectal primary Primary endpoint Difference in response of liver metastases to resection of the primary tumor between the experimental groups and the control group, as determined by histopathological scoring of vascular density, apoptotic and mitotic index and by measurement of the metabolic activity of liver metastases by FDG-PET and SUV measurements. Secondary endpoints Toxicity of neo-adjuvant treatment Complications of surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jul 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 12, 2011
February 1, 2009
5.7 years
April 3, 2008
September 9, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Difference in response of liver metastases between control group and experimental groups determined by histopathological scoring of vascular density,apoptotic and mitotic index
12 weeks
Difference in response of liver metastases between control group and experimental groups determined by FDG-PET
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Toxicity of neo-adjuvant treatment
12 weeks
Complications of surgery
4 weeks
Study Arms (4)
A
ACTIVE COMPARATORimmediate surgery of the primary colorectal tumor, no neoadjuvant therapy
B
EXPERIMENTALneoadjuvant treatment with bevacizumab during 7 weeks prior to surgery of the colorectal primary
C
EXPERIMENTALneoadjuvant treatment with CAPOX during 7 weeks prior to surgery of the colorectal primary
D
EXPERIMENTALneoadjuvant treatment with bevacizumab and CAPOX during 7 weeks prior to surgery of the colorectal primary
Interventions
no neo-adjuvant treatment, immediate surgery
neoadjuvant treatment with bevacizumab during 7 weeks prior to surgery of the colorectal primary
neoadjuvant treatment with CAPOX during 7 weeks prior to surgery of the colorectal primary
neoadjuvant treatment with bevacizumab and CAPOX during 7 weeks prior to surgery of the colorectal primary
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with histological proven primary colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable liver metastases with or without additional extrahepatic disease (primary tumor in situ). Unresectable liver metastases defined as too extensive hepatic involvement or extrahepatic disease.
- Measurable liver metastases on CT scan (RECIST), positive signal of liver metastases on FDG-PET scan
- Age: 18-80 years
- WHO performance scale 0-1
- ASA category I or II
- Negative pregnancy test in women with childbearing potential
- Life expectancy \> 12 weeks
- Laboratory values obtained ≤ 3 weeks prior to study entry, disease evaluation performed ≤ 3 weeks prior to study entry. Adequate bone marrow function (Hb \> 6.5 mmol/L, absolute neutrophil count \> 1.5 x 109/L, platelets \> 100 x 109/L), renal function (serum creatinine \< 1.5 x ULN or creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min (calculated according to Cockroft and Gault), liver function (ASAT and ALAT ≤ 3 x upper normal limit, serum bilirubin ≤ 2 x upper normal limit)
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Signs of bowel obstruction or bleeding from primary tumor
- Prior chemotherapy treatment for advanced disease, prior treatment with anti-angiogenic drugs
- Resectable liver metastases
- Diabetes mellitus
- Continuous use of immunosuppressive agents
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Contra-indications for systemic therapy with bevacizumab (Avastin)/ chemotherapy (Xelox)
- Concurrent severe or uncontrolled disease (i.e. uncontrolled hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction \< 12 months, chronic active infection)
- Sensory neuropathy \> grade 1
- Serious non-healing wound or ulcer
- Patients (M/F) with reproductive potential not implementing adequate contraceptive measures
- Major surgical procedure, open biopsy or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to start of bevacizumab
- Bleeding disorders or coagulopathy or need for full-dose anticoagulation
- Signs or symptoms of brain metastases
- Cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the past 12 months
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
The Netherlands Cancer Institute/ Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands
Related Publications (8)
Gorelik E, Segal S, Feldman M. On the mechanism of tumor "concomitant immunity". Int J Cancer. 1981 Jun 15;27(6):847-56. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910270618. No abstract available.
PMID: 7287231BACKGROUNDO'Reilly MS, Holmgren L, Shing Y, Chen C, Rosenthal RA, Moses M, Lane WS, Cao Y, Sage EH, Folkman J. Angiostatin: a novel angiogenesis inhibitor that mediates the suppression of metastases by a Lewis lung carcinoma. Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):315-28. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90200-3.
PMID: 7525077BACKGROUNDO'Reilly MS, Boehm T, Shing Y, Fukai N, Vasios G, Lane WS, Flynn E, Birkhead JR, Olsen BR, Folkman J. Endostatin: an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Cell. 1997 Jan 24;88(2):277-85. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81848-6.
PMID: 9008168BACKGROUNDPeeters CF, Westphal JR, de Waal RM, Ruiter DJ, Wobbes T, Ruers TJ. Vascular density in colorectal liver metastases increases after removal of the primary tumor in human cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2004 Nov 20;112(4):554-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20374.
PMID: 15382035BACKGROUNDYang AD, Bauer TW, Camp ER, Somcio R, Liu W, Fan F, Ellis LM. Improving delivery of antineoplastic agents with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Cancer. 2005 Apr 15;103(8):1561-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20942.
PMID: 15754332BACKGROUNDHeldin CH, Rubin K, Pietras K, Ostman A. High interstitial fluid pressure - an obstacle in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Oct;4(10):806-13. doi: 10.1038/nrc1456.
PMID: 15510161BACKGROUNDTong RT, Boucher Y, Kozin SV, Winkler F, Hicklin DJ, Jain RK. Vascular normalization by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 blockade induces a pressure gradient across the vasculature and improves drug penetration in tumors. Cancer Res. 2004 Jun 1;64(11):3731-6. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0074.
PMID: 15172975BACKGROUNDJain RK. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science. 2005 Jan 7;307(5706):58-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1104819.
PMID: 15637262BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Theo Ruers, PhD
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kees Punt, PhD
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wim Oyen, PhD
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2008
First Posted
April 16, 2008
Study Start
July 1, 2008
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 12, 2011
Record last verified: 2009-02