Rabeprazole Extended-Release 50 mg Versus Esomeprazole 40 mg for Healing and Symptomatic Relief of Mild to Moderate Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
A Randomized Double-Blind Parallel Study of Rabeprazole Extended-Release 50 mg Versus Esomeprazole 40 mg for Healing and Symptomatic Relief of Mild to Moderate Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
1 other identifier
interventional
1,397
1 country
85
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of Rabeprazole (RAB) Extended-Release (ER) 50 mg versus Esomeprazole (ESO) 40 mg in subjects with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (eGERD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Feb 2008
85 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 23, 2015
CompletedMay 4, 2016
March 1, 2016
1.2 years
April 9, 2008
June 8, 2015
March 28, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants With Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (eGERD) Who Achieved Endoscopically-confirmed Healing by 8 Weeks
Healing at Week 4 or 8 were based on improvement of eGERD of the Los Angeles (LA) classification of esophagitis Grade A or B from Baseline. Classifications include: Not Present: No breaks (erosions) in the esophageal mucosa (however, edema, erythema, or friability may be present). Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks not more than 5mm in maximum length. Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks more than 5mm in maximum length, but not continuous between the tops of 2 mucosal folds. Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. Gread D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.
Baseline and Week 8
Percentage of Participants With eGERD Who Achieved Endoscopically-confirmed Healing by 4 Weeks
Healing at Week 4 or 8 were based on improvement of eGERD of the LA classification of esophagitis Grade A or B from Baseline. Classifications include: Not Present: No breaks (erosions) in the esophageal mucosa (however, edema, erythema, or friability may be present). Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks not more than 5mm in maximum length. Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks more than 5mm in maximum length, but not continuous between the tops of 2 mucosal folds. Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. Gread D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.
Baseline and Week 4
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Diary-recorded Sustained Resolution of Heartburn by Week 4
Week 4
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTAL2
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Rabeprazole ER 50 mg capsule, once daily for 4-8 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female, ages 18 to 75 years.
- History of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms for at least 3 months immediately before screening.
- Heartburn for at least 2 days a week for at least 1 month before screening.
- Esophageal erosions of Los Angeles (LA) Grades A or B based on EGD taken within 14 days prior to enrollment.
- Subjects who are H. pylori negative based on a screening test.
- Females should be either of non-childbearing potential or of childbearing potential. Females of childbearing potential must have negative pregnancy tests prior to randomization. Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to use medically acceptable methods of contraception.
- Subjects must be able to read, write, and understand the language of the symptom diary.
You may not qualify if:
- Current or a history of esophageal motility disorders.
- Current or a history of Barrett's esophagus. Current esophageal strictures or esophagitis (known or suspected to be due to etiology other than GERD such as infection or medications).
- Current or a history of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and other acid hypersecretory conditions, or current gastric or duodenal ulcer.
- Current or a history of cancer, with the exception of fully excised skin basal cell carcinoma.
- Inflammatory bowel disease.
- Unstable diabetes mellitus.
- History of esophageal, gastric and duodenal surgery except simple suturing of an ulcer.
- Subjects who require daily use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral steroids (\>=20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), or aspirin (\> 325 mg/day).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Eisai Inc.lead
Study Sites (85)
Unknown Facility
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, 85741, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
Unknown Facility
Sherwood, Arkansas, 72120, United States
Unknown Facility
Anaheim, California, 92801, United States
Unknown Facility
Chula Vista, California, 91910, United States
Unknown Facility
Fullerton, California, 92835, United States
Unknown Facility
Irvine, California, 92618, United States
Unknown Facility
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
Unknown Facility
Mission Hills, California, 91345, United States
Unknown Facility
Redwood City, California, 94062, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
Unknown Facility
San Louis Obispo, California, 93405, United States
Unknown Facility
West Covina, California, 91790, United States
Unknown Facility
Pueblo, Colorado, 81008, United States
Unknown Facility
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033, United States
Unknown Facility
Bristol, Connecticut, 6010, United States
Unknown Facility
Hartford, Connecticut, 6102, United States
Unknown Facility
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426, United States
Unknown Facility
Hialeah, Florida, 33010, United States
Unknown Facility
Hollywood, Florida, 33021, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256, United States
Unknown Facility
Jupiter, Florida, 33458, United States
Unknown Facility
Largo, Florida, 33777, United States
Unknown Facility
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319, United States
Unknown Facility
Naples, Florida, 34102, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, 33607, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, 33613, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, 33618, United States
Unknown Facility
Newnan, Georgia, 30263, United States
Unknown Facility
Rockford, Illinois, 61107, United States
Unknown Facility
Clive, Iowa, 50325, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
Unknown Facility
Topeka, Kansas, 66606, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, 40291, United States
Unknown Facility
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809, United States
Unknown Facility
Slidell, Louisiana, 70458, United States
Unknown Facility
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401, United States
Unknown Facility
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21742, United States
Unknown Facility
Mexico, Missouri, 65265, United States
Unknown Facility
Washington, Missouri, 63090, United States
Unknown Facility
Vineland, New Jersey, 8360, United States
Unknown Facility
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
Unknown Facility
Bay Shore, New York, 11706, United States
Unknown Facility
Hartsdale, New York, 10530, United States
Unknown Facility
Mineola, New York, 11501, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsford, New York, 14534, United States
Unknown Facility
Boone, North Carolina, 28607, United States
Unknown Facility
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, North Carolina, 28546, United States
Unknown Facility
New Bern, North Carolina, 28562, United States
Unknown Facility
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401, United States
Unknown Facility
Fargo, North Dakota, 58104, United States
Unknown Facility
Dayton, Ohio, 45415, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, 97210, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, 97220, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, 97225, United States
Unknown Facility
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, 29414, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbia, South Carolina, 29203, United States
Unknown Facility
Franklin, Tennessee, 37067, United States
Unknown Facility
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States
Unknown Facility
Jackson, Tennessee, 38301, United States
Unknown Facility
Johnson City, Tennessee, 37604, United States
Unknown Facility
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, 37211, United States
Unknown Facility
Beaumont, Texas, 77701, United States
Unknown Facility
Bryan, Texas, 77802, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, 77079, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Unknown Facility
Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320, United States
Unknown Facility
Bellevue, Washington, 98004, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, 92204-2318, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, 99216, United States
Unknown Facility
Madison, Wisconsin, 53715, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53209, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Eisai Medical Services
- Organization
- Eisai Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yufang Lu
Eisai Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2008
First Posted
April 15, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2009
Study Completion
September 1, 2009
Last Updated
May 4, 2016
Results First Posted
June 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2016-03