NCT00839306

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of rabeprazole extended release 50 mg (once daily) versus ranitidine 150 mg (twice daily) in the maintenance of complete healing in subjects with healed erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (eGERD).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
240

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2008

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2008

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 5, 2009

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2009

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2009

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2010

Completed
5.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 16, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

February 8, 2016

Status Verified

January 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

February 5, 2009

Results QC Date

June 8, 2015

Last Update Submit

January 11, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

GastroesophagealRefluxDiseaseGERD

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Participants With Maintenance of Complete Healing of eGERD at Week 26

    eGERD (erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease) healing measured by the Time-to-Relapse of Oesophageal Erosions using an Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Lesions were identified and graded using the following Los Angeles (LA) classification of Oesophagitis: Not Present: No breaks (erosions) in the oesophageal mucosa (however, edema, erythema, or friability may be present). Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks not more than 5mm in maximum length. Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks more than 5mm in maximum length, but not continuous between the tops of 2 mucosal folds. Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. Grade D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.

    Baseline to Week 26

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Participants With Investigator-recorded Sustained Resolution of Heartburn at Week 26

    Baseline to Week 26

Study Arms (2)

1

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Rabeprazole ER

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Ranitidine

Interventions

50 mg capsule, taken orally, once daily for 26 weeks.

Also known as: Aciphex
1

150 mg capsule, taken orally, twice daily for 26 weeks.

2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \. Prior completion of Study E3810-G000-302 or -303. Subjects will need to have healed erosive esophagitis (absence of esophageal mucosal breaks or erosions) confirmed by EGD and sustained resolution of heartburn at Visit 4 or 5 of Study E3810-G000-302 or -303.

You may not qualify if:

  • Esophageal motility disorders (achalasia, scleroderma, or esophageal spasm).
  • Barrett's esophagus or esophageal stricture.
  • Use of prescription or non-prescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine receptor antagonists (H2RA), antacids, sucralfate, misoprostol, prokinetics or drugs with significant anticholinergic effects throughout the study.
  • Subjects who require chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral steroids (\>= 20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), or aspirin (-\>; 325 mg/day).
  • Significant hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, hematologic, neurologic, psychiatric, or cardiovascular system abnormalities that would be likely to interfere with the conduct of the study, the interpretation of study results, or the health of the subject during the study.
  • Any condition that would make the subject, in the opinion of the Investigator or Sponsor, unsuitable for the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Associates, Ltd.

Moline, Illinois, 61265, United States

Location

Midwest Clinical

Moline, Illinois, 61265, United States

Location

Research

Moline, Illinois, 61265, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Moline, Illinois, 61265, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal RefluxDisease

Interventions

RabeprazoleRanitidine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Esophageal Motility DisordersDeglutition DisordersEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesSulfoxidesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsPyridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsBenzimidazolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingFurans

Results Point of Contact

Title
Eisai Medical Services
Organization
Eisai Inc.

Study Officials

  • Guillermo Rossiter, M.D.

    Eisai Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2009

First Posted

February 9, 2009

Study Start

August 1, 2008

Primary Completion

August 1, 2009

Study Completion

January 1, 2010

Last Updated

February 8, 2016

Results First Posted

November 16, 2015

Record last verified: 2016-01

Locations