Rabeprazole Extended Release 50 mg Versus Ranitidine 150 mg for Maintenance of Healed Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
A Randomized Double-Blind Parallel Study of Rabeprazole Extended Release 50 mg Versus Ranitidine 150 mg for Maintenance of Healed Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of rabeprazole extended release 50 mg (once daily) versus ranitidine 150 mg (twice daily) in the maintenance of complete healing in subjects with healed erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (eGERD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Aug 2008
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 16, 2015
CompletedFebruary 8, 2016
January 1, 2016
1 year
February 5, 2009
June 8, 2015
January 11, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants With Maintenance of Complete Healing of eGERD at Week 26
eGERD (erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease) healing measured by the Time-to-Relapse of Oesophageal Erosions using an Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Lesions were identified and graded using the following Los Angeles (LA) classification of Oesophagitis: Not Present: No breaks (erosions) in the oesophageal mucosa (however, edema, erythema, or friability may be present). Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks not more than 5mm in maximum length. Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks more than 5mm in maximum length, but not continuous between the tops of 2 mucosal folds. Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. Grade D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.
Baseline to Week 26
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants With Investigator-recorded Sustained Resolution of Heartburn at Week 26
Baseline to Week 26
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTAL2
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Prior completion of Study E3810-G000-302 or -303. Subjects will need to have healed erosive esophagitis (absence of esophageal mucosal breaks or erosions) confirmed by EGD and sustained resolution of heartburn at Visit 4 or 5 of Study E3810-G000-302 or -303.
You may not qualify if:
- Esophageal motility disorders (achalasia, scleroderma, or esophageal spasm).
- Barrett's esophagus or esophageal stricture.
- Use of prescription or non-prescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine receptor antagonists (H2RA), antacids, sucralfate, misoprostol, prokinetics or drugs with significant anticholinergic effects throughout the study.
- Subjects who require chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral steroids (\>= 20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), or aspirin (-\>; 325 mg/day).
- Significant hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, hematologic, neurologic, psychiatric, or cardiovascular system abnormalities that would be likely to interfere with the conduct of the study, the interpretation of study results, or the health of the subject during the study.
- Any condition that would make the subject, in the opinion of the Investigator or Sponsor, unsuitable for the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Eisai Inc.lead
Study Sites (4)
Associates, Ltd.
Moline, Illinois, 61265, United States
Midwest Clinical
Moline, Illinois, 61265, United States
Research
Moline, Illinois, 61265, United States
Unknown Facility
Moline, Illinois, 61265, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Eisai Medical Services
- Organization
- Eisai Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Guillermo Rossiter, M.D.
Eisai Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2009
First Posted
February 9, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 8, 2016
Results First Posted
November 16, 2015
Record last verified: 2016-01