Study Stopped
Removal of Darvocet from US market
Lumbar Stenosis Outcomes Research II
LUSTORII
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of the proposed pilot study is to determine the efficacy of oxymorphone hydrochloride and propoxyphene/acetaminophen combination in prolonging the time to onset of pain and reducing the severity of pain associated with walking in patients lumbar spinal stenosis that have clinical symptoms of neurogenic claudication. Neurogenic claudication is defined as movement induced leg pain, numbness, heaviness, or vague discomfort in part or all of one or both legs provoked with walking and standing and relieved by sitting, squatting, or forward flexion posturing. The secondary objective is to examine the functional benefit of oxymorphone hydrochloride and propoxyphene/acetaminophen combination with respect to improvement in duration and distance of walking.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Mar 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 25, 2016
CompletedMarch 25, 2016
February 1, 2016
2.7 years
March 11, 2008
July 10, 2012
February 24, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to First Symptoms (Tfirst) of Moderate Pain
Using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable)the time to first symptoms (Tfirst) with a NRS score greater than or equal to 4 (moderate pain level), with treadmill ambulation was measured. Patients were excluded from the trial if there pain at rest was greater than or equal to 4/10.
study visit
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Area Under the Curve
study visit
Total Distance
study visit
Recovery Time
study visit
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
study visit
Patient Global Assessment (PGA)
study visit
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Opana then darvocet then placebo
EXPERIMENTALOpana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later placebo tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.
Opana then placebo then darvocet
EXPERIMENTALOpana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later placebo tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.
Placebo then opana then darvocet
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo tablet tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) was given one time at the third study visit, four days later darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.
Placebo then darvocet then opana
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo tablet tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.
Darvocet then opana then placebo
EXPERIMENTALDarvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later placebo tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.
Darvocet then placebo then opana
EXPERIMENTALDarvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later placebo tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.
Interventions
Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later placebo tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.
Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later placebo tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.
Placebo tablet tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) was given one time at the third study visit, four days later darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.
Placebo tablet tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.
Darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later placebo tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.
Darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later placebo tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must present with clinical symptoms of neurogenic claudication (exercise induced leg pain, numbness, heaviness, or vague discomfort in part or all of one or both legs provoked with walking and standing and relieved by sitting, squatting, or forward flexion posturing) and endorse limitation of walking tolerance due to these symptoms
- Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain ≥ 6 in response to the following question: "Circle one number (from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain) - How would you rate the worst leg and lower back pain you experienced during walking last week?"
- Patients must have confirmatory imaging by MRI or CT scan demonstrating at least one level of lumbar spinal stenosis within 1 year
- Duration of symptoms \> 3 months
- Age \> 50 years; male or female
You may not qualify if:
- Past or present existence of a movement disorder, e.g., Parkinsonism, or an neurologic disease that might affect the ability to ambulate (e.g., signs/symptoms of cauda equina compression)
- Cognitive impairment preventing full understanding or participation in the study
- Peripheral vascular disease
- Moderate to severe arthritis of the knee or hip that might severely compromise ambulation
- Past or present lower extremity peripheral vascular disease
- Serious concomitant medical illness (e.g., heart disease) that might impair ambulation assessment
- Previous lumbar surgery for spinal stenosis (laminectomy with or without fusion) within the past 2 years or epidural steroid injection in the preceding 4 months.
- Severe psychiatric disorder
- Mean time to severe symptoms \> 15 minutes.
- Epidural steroid treatment within the last three months
- History of drug or alcohol dependence
- Serious intercurrent illness
- Hypersensitivity to oxymorphone hydrochloride
- Hypersensitivity to propoxyphene or acetaminophen
- Severe bronchial asthma or hypercarbia, morphine analogs such as codeine, or any of the other ingredients of Opana
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Rochesterlead
- Endo Pharmaceuticalscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
2180 S. Clinton Ave
Rochester, New York, 14618, United States
Related Publications (6)
Simon LS, Evans C, Katz N, Bombardier C, West C, Robbins J, Copley-Merriman C, Markman J, Coombs JH. Preliminary development of a responder index for chronic low back pain. J Rheumatol. 2007 Jun;34(6):1386-91.
PMID: 17552065BACKGROUNDMarkman JD, Dworkin RH. Ion channel targets and treatment efficacy in neuropathic pain. J Pain. 2006 Jan;7(1 Suppl 1):S38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.09.008.
PMID: 16427000BACKGROUNDDeen HG Jr, Zimmerman RS, Lyons MK, McPhee MC, Verheijde JL, Lemens SM. Test-retest reproducibility of the exercise treadmill examination in lumbar spinal stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Oct;75(10):1002-7. doi: 10.4065/75.10.1002.
PMID: 11040847BACKGROUNDDeen HG, Zimmerman RS, Lyons MK, McPhee MC, Verheijde JL, Lemens SM. Use of the exercise treadmill to measure baseline functional status and surgical outcome in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jan 15;23(2):244-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199801150-00019.
PMID: 9474733BACKGROUNDStucki G, Daltroy L, Liang MH, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Apr 1;21(7):796-803. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199604010-00004.
PMID: 8779009BACKGROUNDMarkman JD, Gewandter JS, Frazer ME, Murray NM, Rast SA, McDermott MP, Chowdhry AK, Tomkinson EJ, Pilcher WH, Walter KA, Dworkin RH. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial of Oxymorphone Hydrochloride and Propoxyphene/Acetaminophen Combination for the Treatment of Neurogenic Claudication Associated With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 15;40(10):684-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000837.
PMID: 25705958DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study terminated early (leading to small number of subjects analyzed) due to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) removing active control (Darvocet) from the U.S. market.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. John D. Markman, MD
- Organization
- Translational Pain Research, University of Rochester Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John D Markman, M.D.
University of Rochester
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Translational Pain Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2008
First Posted
April 3, 2008
Study Start
March 1, 2008
Primary Completion
November 1, 2010
Study Completion
August 1, 2011
Last Updated
March 25, 2016
Results First Posted
March 25, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02