Study Stopped
Due to Medtronic's voluntary withdrawal of PMA P040001 for X-STOP systems; post-approval study costs outweighed business benefits for marketing X-STOP in US.
Condition of Approval Study
COAST
Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With X-STOP® PEEK Spacer in Moderately Symptomatic Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
176
1 country
23
Brief Summary
This prospective, multicenter longitudinal five-year study of X-STOP PEEK usage in LSS patients is designed to supplement pre-market safety and effectiveness data with information on longer-term device performance in a population of patients with moderately impaired physical function at preoperative baseline (i.e., an "indicated" population) who elect to undergo X STOP PEEK surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Aug 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_4
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 12, 2016
CompletedJanuary 2, 2018
January 1, 2016
7.5 years
August 15, 2007
December 1, 2015
December 6, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment Success Rate at 24 Months
Treatment success rate is reported as the percentage of participants who met all of the following criteria: 1. Clinically significant improvement (by at least 0.5 points) in the Symptom Severity (SS) domain of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) compared to preoperative baseline 2. Clinically significant improvement (by at least 0.5 points) in the Physical Function (PF) domain of the ZCQ compared to pre-operative baseline 3. Patient satisfaction with treatment defined as a Patient Satisfaction (PS) score \< 2.5 4. No additional surgery for lumbar stenosis performed 5. Maintenance of distraction 6. No dislodgement of the implant 7. No device-related complications
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Treatment Success Rate at 60 Months
60 months
Symptom Severity (SS) Scores Measured by Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months
Success Rate in Symptom Severity (SS) Domain of Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ)
6 weeks, 12months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months
Physical Function (PF) Scores Measured by Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months
Success Rate in Physical Function (PF) Domain of Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ)
6 weeks, 12months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (6)
Percent of Subjects With Pfirrmann Grades Increased From Baseline at Any Index Level at 24 Months
24 months
Percent of Subjects With Pfirrmann Grades Increased From Baseline at Any Index Level at 60 Months
60 months
Percent of Subjects With Pfirrmann Grades Increased at Adjacent Levels at 24 Months
24 months
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
X-STOP PEEK
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, patients will undergo X-STOP PEEK surgery.
Interventions
Placement of X-STOP PEEK in up to two levels in the lumbar spine for patients diagnosed with moderately symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis in accordance with current labeling instructions for use.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- has a baseline score \>2.0 in the Physical Function (PF) domain of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire
- is 50 years old or older
- has leg/buttock/groin pain with or without back pain NOTE: Leg/buttock/groin pain must be completely relieved when flexed such as when sitting in a chair. If back pain is also present, it must be partially relieved when flexed.
- can sit for 50 minutes without pain
- can walk 50 feet or more
- has a confirmed diagnosis of neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis, with X-Ray, MRI and/or CT evidence of thickened ligamentum flavum, narrowed lateral recess and/or central canal narrowing
- has completed at least six months of conservative care therapy which may include but is not limited to physical therapy, bracing, systemic or injected medications
- has signed a patient informed consent document
- is physically and mentally willing and able or has a caregiver who can comply with the postoperative and routinely scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations
- lives in the immediate area and has no plans to relocate to another geographic area before completion of the study or lives outside the immediate area and will comply with the scheduled postoperative visits with a prearranged and designated physician
You may not qualify if:
- has a baseline score less than or equal to 2.0 in the Physical Function (PF) domain of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire
- cannot sit for 50 minutes
- cannot walk more than 50 feet
- has unremitting pain in any spinal position
- has axial back pain only without leg/buttock/groin pain
- has a fixed motor deficit
- has cauda equina syndrome defined as neural compression causing neurogenic bowel (rectal incontinence) or bladder (bladder retention or incontinence) dysfunction
- has severe symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis at more than two levels
- has significant instability of the lumbar spine, e.g., isthmic spondylolisthesis or degenerative spondylolisthesis greater than grade 1 (on a scale of 1 to 4)
- has an ankylosed segment at the affected level(s);
- has significant scoliosis (Cobb angle is greater than 25 degrees)
- has an acute fracture of the spinous process or pars interarticularis
- has sustained pathologic fractures of the vertebrae or multiple fractures of the vertebrae and /or hips
- has severe osteoporosis of the spine or hip, defined as bone mineral density (BMD) in the spine or hip more than 2.5 SD below the mean of adult normals in the presence of one or more fragility fractures
- has Paget's disease at the involved segment(s) or metastasis to the vertebrae
- +14 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (23)
The Kirklin Clinic - UAB Medical
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249, United States
Tucson Orthopaedic Institute-East Office
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Tucson Orthopaedic Institute-Northwest Office
Tucson, Arizona, 85741, United States
Silicon Valley Spine Institute
Campbell, California, 95008, United States
UC Davis Spine Center
Sacramento, California, 95818, United States
UCLA Comprehensive Spine Center
Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States
Colorado Neurosurgery Associates, P.C.
Denver, Colorado, 80220, United States
Panaorama Orthopedics and Spine Center
Golden, Colorado, 80401, United States
Yale School of Medicine, Dept. of Orthopaedics
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
George Washington University Hospital Medical Facility Associates
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037, United States
Pinnacle Orthopedics
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Orthopaedic Center of Southern Illinois
Mount Vernon, Illinois, 62864, United States
University of Kentucky, Dept of Neurosurgery
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0298, United States
Spine Institute of Louisiana
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101, United States
Drisko, Fee & Parkins, P.C.
Kansas City, Missouri, 64116, United States
UpState Orthopedics
East Syracuse, New York, 13057, United States
Mayfield Clinic
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
The Center Orthopedic & Neurosurgical Care & Research
Bend, Oregon, 97701, United States
NeuroSpine Institute
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
OrthopaediCare
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 19090, United States
Texas Back Institute
Plano, Denton, Mansfield, Texas, 75093, 76208, 76063, United States
Neurosurgical Associates of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78258, United States
Scott & White Memorial Hospital & Scott, Sherwood & Brindley Foundation
Temple, Texas, 76508, United States
Related Publications (3)
Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ, Johnson DR 2nd, Skidmore GA, Vessa PP, Dwyer JW, Puccio ST, Cauthen JC, Ozuna RM. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 15;30(12):1351-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166618.42749.d1.
PMID: 15959362BACKGROUNDHsu KY, Zucherman JF, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ, Johnson DR 2nd, Skidmore GA, Vessa PP, Dwyer JW, Cauthen JC, Ozuna RM. Quality of life of lumbar stenosis-treated patients in whom the X STOP interspinous device was implanted. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Dec;5(6):500-7. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.5.6.500.
PMID: 17176013BACKGROUNDKondrashov DG, Hannibal M, Hsu KY, Zucherman JF. Interspinous process decompression with the X-STOP device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a 4-year follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Jul;19(5):323-7. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211294.67508.3b.
PMID: 16826002BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study strengths include collection of 5-year data and radiographic examinations. Study weaknesses include single-arm design and early termination of the study without reaching the desired sample size.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Department
- Organization
- Medtronic Spinal and biologics
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jim Malcolm, MD
Pinnacle Orthopedics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2007
First Posted
August 17, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Primary Completion
February 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 2, 2018
Results First Posted
February 12, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01