QUILT-2.019: A Study of AMG 655 or AMG 479 in Combination With Gemcitabine for Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
A Phase 1b/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of AMG 655 or AMG 479 in Combination With Gemcitabine as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
138
1 country
44
Brief Summary
This is a multi-center, 2-part study of AMG 655, AMG 479 or AMG 655-placebo plus gemcitabine as first-line treatment of subjects with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Part 1 is an open-label, dose-escalation phase 1b segment to determine the safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose of AMG 655 in combination with gemcitabine. Enrollment into part 1 of the study has been completed. Part 2 is a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 segment to estimate the efficacy as assessed by 6 month survival of AMG 655, AMG 479, or AMG 655-placebo in combination with gemcitabine. The phase 2 segment that will commence after dose selection in part 1. In part 2, subjects will be randomized 1:1:1 to AMG 655, AMG 479, or placebo in combination with gemcitabine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Jun 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_1
44 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 17, 2024
CompletedOctober 17, 2024
October 1, 2024
2.6 years
February 28, 2008
July 8, 2024
October 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs; Phase 1b Portion Only)
The incidence of adverse events and clinical laboratory abnormalities defined as DLTs. A DLT was defined as any grade 3 or higher hematologic or non-hematologic toxicity related to any study treatment.
28 days
Six Month Overall Survival Rate (Phase 2 Portion Only)
The proportion of subjects alive at 6 months
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Objective Response Rate
From start of study treatment through up to 36 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
From start of study treatment through up to 36 months
Overall Survival
From start of study treatment through up to 36 months
Number of Subjects With an Adverse Event
From start of study treatment through up to 44 weeks
Pharmacokinetics of AMG 655, Ganitumab, and Gemcitabine
From start of study treatment through up to 48 weeks
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (5)
Phase 1b AMG 655 3mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were treated with one of 2 dose levels of AMG 655 (3 mg/kg) with gemcitabine.
Phase 1b AMG 655 10mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were treated with one of 2 dose levels of AMG 655 (10 mg/kg) with gemcitabine.
Phase 2 AMG 655
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were treated with the dose of AMG 655 (10mg/kg) in combination with gemcitabine. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered by intravenous infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28 day cycle followed by the AMG 655 infusion on days 1 and 15 after completion of the gemcitabine infusion.
Phase 2 AMG 479
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were treated with the dose of AMG 479 (12 mg/kg) in combination with gemcitabine. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered by intravenous infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28 day cycle followed by the AMG 479 infusion on days 1 and 15 after completion of the gemcitabine infusion.
Phase 2 AMG 655-placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects were treated with the dose of AMG 655-placebo in combination with gemcitabine. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered by intravenous infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28 day cycle followed by the AMG 655-placebo infusion on days 1 and 15 after completion of the gemcitabine infusion.
Interventions
AMG 479 is fully human monoclonal antagonist antibody targeted against insulin-like growth factor receptor type 1 (IGF-1R).
AMG 655 is a fully human monoclonal agonist antibody directed against TRAIL Receptor 2 (TR-2).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (AJCC Stage IV)
- Subjects with unresectable pancreatic cancer who have had surgery are eligible if fully recovered and greater than 30 days have elapsed since the surgery.
- Subjects with a history of pancreatoduodenectomy are eligible provided that there is radiographically documented disease recurrence.
- Men or women ≥ 18 years of age
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1
- Adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal and coagulation function
- Amylase and lipase ≤ 2.0 x ULN
- Adequately controlled type 1 or 2 diabetic subjects
You may not qualify if:
- Islet cell, acinar cell carcinoma, non-adenocarcinoma (eg, lymphoma, sarcoma, etc), adenocarcinoma originated from biliary tree or cystadenocarcinoma
- Known central nervous system metastases
- Uncontrolled cardiac disease or any other co-morbid disease that would increase the risk of toxicity
- Adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NantCell, Inc.lead
Study Sites (44)
Research Site
Alhambra, California, 91801, United States
Research Site
Bakersfield, California, 93309, United States
Research Site
Fullerton, California, 92835, United States
Research Site
La Jolla, California, 92093, United States
Research Site
Long Beach, California, 90813, United States
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Research Site
Northridge, California, 91328, United States
Research Site
Oxnard, California, 93030, United States
Research Site
Rancho Mirage, California, 92270, United States
Research Site
Redondo Beach, California, 90277, United States
Research Site
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
Research Site
Santa Maria, California, 93454, United States
Research Site
Santa Monica, California, 90403, United States
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32804, United States
Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, United States
Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30341, United States
Research Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Research Site
Harvey, Illinois, 60426, United States
Research Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204, United States
Research Site
Westminster, Maryland, 21157, United States
Research Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Research Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States
Research Site
Henderson, Nevada, 89052, United States
Research Site
Albany, New York, 12206, United States
Research Site
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Research Site
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Research Site
Hickory, North Carolina, 28602, United States
Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Research Site
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106, United States
Research Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261, United States
Research Site
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
Research Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615, United States
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78731, United States
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78745, United States
Research Site
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
Research Site
Round Rock, Texas, 78681, United States
Research Site
Tyler, Texas, 75702, United States
Research Site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405, United States
Research Site
Yakima, Washington, 98902, United States
Related Publications (5)
Cella D, Butt Z, Kindler HL, Fuchs CS, Bray S, Barlev A, Oglesby A. Validity of the FACT Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire for assessing disease-related symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Qual Life Res. 2013 Jun;22(5):1105-12. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0217-4. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
PMID: 22678353BACKGROUNDKindler HL, Richards DA, Garbo LE, Garon EB, Stephenson JJ Jr, Rocha-Lima CM, Safran H, Chan D, Kocs DM, Galimi F, McGreivy J, Bray SL, Hei Y, Feigal EG, Loh E, Fuchs CS. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of ganitumab (AMG 479) or conatumumab (AMG 655) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012 Nov;23(11):2834-2842. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds142. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
PMID: 22700995BACKGROUNDLu, JF.Exposure-response analysis to facilitate phase 3 dose selection for Ganitumumab (AMG 479) in combination with Gemcitabine to treat metastatic pancreatic cancer.Journal-000728;
BACKGROUNDMcCaffery I, Tudor Y, Deng H, Tang R, Suzuki S, Badola S, Kindler HL, Fuchs CS, Loh E, Patterson SD, Chen L, Gansert JL. Putative predictive biomarkers of survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with gemcitabine and ganitumab, an IGF1R inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Aug 1;19(15):4282-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1840. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
PMID: 23741071BACKGROUNDTBD.Validation of the FACT-hepatobiliary questionnaire in metastatic pancreatic cancer population.Journal-004521;
BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sandeep Bobby Reddy, Chief Medical Officer
- Organization
- ImmunityBio
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2008
First Posted
March 7, 2008
Study Start
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
April 1, 2012
Last Updated
October 17, 2024
Results First Posted
October 17, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10