A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Alefacept in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Efficacy and Safety of Alefacept in Combination With Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Steroids in de Novo Kidney Transplantation - a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
218
12 countries
33
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether alefacept is effective and well tolerated when used with a combination of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids versus a combination therapy of placebo, tacrolimus and steroids in the prevention of kidney transplant rejection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Dec 2007
33 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 18, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 4, 2016
CompletedFebruary 4, 2016
January 1, 2016
1.8 years
February 6, 2008
January 5, 2016
January 5, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-confirmed Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection at Month 6 Assessed by Local Review
Biopsies were graded by the clinical site pathologist.according to the Banff 97/05 updated histological classification: * Grade IA: significant interstitial infiltration (\>25% parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis; * Grade IB: significant interstitial infiltration (\>25% parenchyma affected) and foci of severe tubulitis; * Grade IIA: mild to moderate intimal arteritis; * Grade IIB: severe intimal arteritis comprising \>25% of the luminal area; * Grade III: "transmural" arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocyte inflammation. A biopsy confirmed acute rejection was an event of suspected acute rejection confirmed by a graft biopsy result of Banff grade ≥ 1. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of biopsy-confirmed acute T-cell mediated rejection within the first 6 months following transplantation is reported. Participants lost to follow-up or with missing outcomes were censored at their last follow up visit.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Antibody-Mediated Acute Rejection at Month 6
6 months
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Rejection (T-Cell Mediated or Antibody Mediated) at Month 6
6 months
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Acute Mixed T-Cell Mediated and Antibody-Mediated Rejection at Month 6
6 months
Percentage of Participants With Acute Rejection Diagnosed by Signs and Symptoms at Month 6
6 months
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Treated Acute Rejection at Month 6
6 months
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants received placebo administered intra-operatively as an intravenous (IV) bolus on Day 0, another IV bolus on Day 3 and weekly subcutaneous injections thereafter for 12 weeks. Participants also received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroid treatment.
Alefacept
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received 7.5 mg alefacept administered intra-operatively as an IV bolus on Day 0, another 7.5 mg IV bolus on Day 3, and weekly subcutaneous injections of 15 mg alefacept thereafter for 12 weeks. Participants also received tacrolimus, MMF and steroid treatment.
Interventions
The initial daily dose was 0.2 mg/kg orally given in 2 doses commencing 24 hours after completion of surgery.
Mycophenolic mofetil was administered as 750 mg twice per day orally
Methylprednisolone or equivalent: Day 0: 500 - 1000 mg IV bolus Day 1: 125 - 250 mg IV bolus Prednisone or equivalent: Days 2 - 14: 20 - 30 mg orally Days 15 - 28: 10 - 20 mg orally Days 29 - 60: 10 - 15 mg orally Days 61 onwards: 5 - 10 mg orally
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject with end stage kidney disease who is a suitable candidate for primary kidney transplantation or retransplantation
- Male or female subject at least 18 years of age and younger than 65 years
- Subject receiving a kidney transplant from a non-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) identical living donor or deceased HLA identical/non-HLA identical donor between 5 and 59 years of age with compatible ABO blood type (Blood group system A, B, AB and 0)
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has a panel reactivity antibody grade \> 20% in the previous 6 months and/or had had a previous graft survival shorter than 1 year due to immunological reasons
- Subject received a kidney transplant from a non-heart beating donor
- Subject has received a kidney transplant from a 50 - 59 year old donor with two of the following three factors: history of hypertension, cerebrovascular accident as cause of death, final pre-procurement serum creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dL (united network for organ sharing \[UNOS\] expanded criteria donor)
- Cold ischemia time of the donor kidney is ≥ 30 hours
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (33)
Unknown Facility
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Unknown Facility
Brussels, 1070, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Brussels, 1200, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Liège, 4000, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Prague, 140 21, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Créteil, 94010, France
Unknown Facility
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275, France
Unknown Facility
Montpellier, 34295, France
Unknown Facility
Nantes, 44093, France
Unknown Facility
Nice, 6002, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, 75475, France
Unknown Facility
Toulouse, 31054, France
Unknown Facility
Bochum, 44892, Germany
Unknown Facility
Regensburg, 93053, Germany
Unknown Facility
Budapest, 1082, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Bologna, 40138, Italy
Unknown Facility
Padua, 35128, Italy
Unknown Facility
Rome, 00168, Italy
Unknown Facility
Siena, 53100, Italy
Unknown Facility
Maastricht, 6229, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Bydgoszcz, 85-094, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, 60-479, Poland
Unknown Facility
Szczecin, 70-111, Poland
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, 8036, Spain
Unknown Facility
Llobregat, 8907, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, 28041, Spain
Unknown Facility
Málaga, 29010, Spain
Unknown Facility
Santander, 39008, Spain
Unknown Facility
Gothenburg, 41345, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Uppsala, 75185, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Director Medical Science
- Organization
- Astellas Pharma Europe B.V
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Central Contact
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2008
First Posted
February 18, 2008
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion
September 1, 2009
Study Completion
September 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 4, 2016
Results First Posted
February 4, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01