Split Dose Golytely With Amitiza Pretreatment Versus Split Dose Golytely Plus Placebo in Outpatient Colonoscopy
Single Dose Lubiprostone Along With Split-dose PEG Solution Without Dietary Restrictions for Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy, a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
191
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary outcomes of this procedure will be: 1. The cleanliness of the prep as measured by the Ottawa Scale (attachment a). Secondary outcomes will be: 1. Patient satisfaction with the prep measured by 5 point Likert scale (attachment b); 2. Procedure time; 3. The number and size of polyps detected on examination.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2007
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 1, 2012
CompletedNovember 1, 2012
October 1, 2012
3 months
January 29, 2008
July 24, 2012
October 3, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Overall Cleanliness of the Prep as Measured by the Ottawa Scale
Bowel cleansing was evaluated with the Ottawa bowel preparation scale by each endoscopist during the endoscopy. Neither the endoscopist nor the endoscopy nurse was aware of the bowel preparation used prior to the colonoscopy. The Ottawa bowel preparation scale is a validated tool and was used in this study to provide a reliable quality assessment of the bowel preparation used for colonoscopy. This validated scale rates each section of the colon, the right, the mid, and the rectosigmoid colon, on a 5-point scale (0-4), as well as a global 3-point rating for overall colonic fluid (0-2). The total score ranges from 0 to 14. An excellent preparation with little fluid would score 0-3, a good preparation 4-6, while scores higher than 7would indicate progressively worsening bowel preparations. A completely unprepared colon would score 11-14, depending on the amount of colonic fluid
measured upon completion of the colonoscopy, colonoscopies completed during the course of the study (approximately 4 month period)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Patient Satisfaction With the Prep Measured by 5 Point Likert Scale
measured after completion of the bowel preparation and prior to the colonoscopy, completed during the course of the study (approximately 4 month period)
Procedure Time
measured upon completion of the colonoscopy, colonoscopies completed during the course of the study (approximately 4 month period)
The Number of Polyps Detected on Examination
measured upon completion of the colonoscopy, colonoscopies completed during the course of the study (approximately 4 month period)
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORsplit-dose PEG solution without dietary restrictions plus lubiprostone 24mcg gelcap pretreatment
2
PLACEBO COMPARATORsplit-dose PEG solution without dietary restrictions plus placebo pretreatment
Interventions
lubiprostone 24mcg gelcap, 1 gelcap taken at noon the day prior to the colonoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients referred to our clinic for Average or Increased Risk screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Ages will be from 18 years of age and older
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic kidney disease
- Previous diagnosis of congestive heart failure
- History of bowel obstruction
- History of solid organ transplant
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brooke Army Medical Centerlead
- Takedacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Brooke Army Medical Center
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, 78234, United States
Related Publications (5)
Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Melton LJ 3rd. A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Dec;97(12):3186-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07129.x.
PMID: 12492209BACKGROUNDTan JJ, Tjandra JJ. Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy - a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2006 May;8(4):247-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00970.x.
PMID: 16630226BACKGROUNDEl Sayed AM, Kanafani ZA, Mourad FH, Soweid AM, Barada KA, Adorian CS, Nasreddine WA, Sharara AI. A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jul;58(1):36-40. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.318.
PMID: 12838218BACKGROUNDChurch JM. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy--timing is the key! Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Oct;41(10):1223-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02258217.
PMID: 9788383BACKGROUNDLacy BE, Levy LC. Lubiprostone: a chloride channel activator. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr;41(4):345-51. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000225665.68920.df.
PMID: 17413599BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study may be limited by the recruitment of outpatients as the only study participants. The study results might have also been affected by limiting the indication for colonoscopy to colorectal cancer screening.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Joel Stengel
- Organization
- Carl R Darnall Army Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joel Z Stengel, MD
Brooke Army Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Gastroenterology Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2008
First Posted
February 11, 2008
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
January 1, 2008
Study Completion
January 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 1, 2012
Results First Posted
November 1, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10