BAY14-2222 Prophylaxis and Joint Function Improvement (Adults)
A Prospective Controlled Study on the Effect on Bleeding Events and Joint Function in Young Adults With Severe Hemophilia A After a 6 Month Prophylaxis Treatment Compared to on Demand Treatment
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
5 countries
11
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of prophylactic treatment on the number of joint bleeds and quality of life in severe hemophilia A subjects compared to on-demand treatment in a one-group two-treatment schedule design. In addition, the effect of prophylactic treatment on the joint function, the number of all bleeds, and on the quality of life compared to on-demand treatment and health-economic data will be assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Feb 2006
Typical duration for phase_4
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 4, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 19, 2009
CompletedNovember 3, 2014
October 1, 2014
2.1 years
December 21, 2007
April 3, 2009
October 27, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Joint Bleeds
Number of joint bleeds during Months 8-13 compared to number of joint bleeds during Months 1-6
Months 1-6 (on-demand treatment) and 8-13 (prophylactic treatment)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of All Bleeds
Months 1-6 (on-demand treatment) and 8-13 (prophylactic treatment)
Physical Assessment Compared to On-demand Treatment as Determined by the Gilbert Score
Month 13 (end of prophylactic treatment) and Month 6 (end of on-demand treatment)
Quality of Life Compared to On-demand Treatment as Measured by the Haemo-QoL A Questionnaire
Month 13 (end of prophylactic treatment) and Month 6 (end of on-demand treatment)
Study Arms (1)
rFVIII-FS (octocog-alfa), (Kogenate FS)
EXPERIMENTALOn-demand treatment was to follow the same treatment pattern the subject was using before entering the study. While on prophylactic treatment, all subjects were to be treated at a dose of 20-40 IU/kg, 3 times per week at a stable dose.
Interventions
One group two treatment schedules, first on-demand then switch to prophylaxis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Severe hemophilia A (\< 1% FVIII)
- years of age
- Previously treated subject (\> 100 Exposure days to any FVIII)
- On-demand therapy with any FVIII
You may not qualify if:
- No history of inhibitor
- No planned elective orthopedic surgery during the study duration (13 months)
- No severe concomitant disease
- No history of anaphylactic or other severe reaction to previous FVIII treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bayerlead
Study Sites (11)
Unknown Facility
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Unknown Facility
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Unknown Facility
Strasbourg, 67098, France
Unknown Facility
Florence, 50134, Italy
Unknown Facility
Pavia, 27100, Italy
Unknown Facility
Roma, 00161, Italy
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Madrid, 28046, Spain
Unknown Facility
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38009, Spain
Unknown Facility
Cardiff, South Glamorgan, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The short observation period of 6 months may be responsible for the lack of statistical significance between treatments in the subject's overall assessment of disease-related quality of life; however, a positive trend was noted.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- BAYER
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bayer Study Director
Bayer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2007
First Posted
January 4, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2006
Primary Completion
March 1, 2008
Study Completion
March 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 3, 2014
Results First Posted
November 19, 2009
Record last verified: 2014-10